International Stem Cell Corporation’s Ken Aldrich Comments on Recent News about SCNT – Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
By Dr. Matthew Watson
Last week's newspapers carried the news of what was widely described as a significant “breakthrough” in stem cell science: the first successful human use of a technology known as Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer (also referred to as SCNT). This is essentially a variation on a process that was used some years ago to create a cloned sheep named Dolly. Cloning has since been used commercially in various animal applications.
What is strange about the flurry of publicity about this discovery, however, is the almost total lack of commentary about a method of creating stem cells that has been available to researchers for almost half a decade, holds the same kind of promise as embryonic stem cells for providing cells for the treatment of almost any kind of degenerative disease, is free of ethical issues (including issues with egg donation), and can potentially make immune matched cells available to any patient anywhere in the world, on demand, at a far lower cost.
I am talking about human stem cells derived from a process called, “Parthenogenesis”, developed and first announced in 2007 by a company called International Stem Cell Corporation, whose discoveries were first published in the peer reviewed journal, Cloning and Stem Cells, edited by the scientist who first created “Dolly”, the first cloned animal.
I realize that I could be accused of bias because I am one of the founders of International Stem Cell, but, in fact, our company also owns license rights to some of the key intellectual property that is required to create cells through SCNT technology and our scientists are very familiar with its promise and its limitations. As a result, International Stem Cell will benefit from the development of either technology, but it is important that the public and the scientific community be fully aware of all alternatives in the field of regenerative medicine, not just the ones that capture public imagination at any particular time.
For that reason, I would like to comment on Parthenogenesis and compare it to SCNT technology and the other options available today. The technology known as "Parthenogenesis" begins with human eggs that are created and used every day throughout the world for in-vitro fertilization (IVF). What is not generally known is that the IVF process can often result in the creation of far more unfertilized eggs than will ever be needed for fertility purposes. It is possible, with informed consent from the IVF patient, to hold back some unfertilized eggs for creation of parthenogenetic stem cells, all at no additional risk to the donor.
Instead of wasting those eggs, what International Stem Cell does, with the full consent of the donors, is to save those eggs from the trash bin, induce them through a simple, but patented, process to create the small cluster of cells from which a stem cell line can be created that can be used for scientific research and the eventual treatment of patients with such diseases as Parkinson’s, Macular Degeneration, Liver Disease, Diabetes, and possibly many others.
What are critical to understand in thinking about Parthenogenetic stem cells are six things:
Like embryonic stem cells and SCNT cells, these cells can be converted into almost any cell in the human body and thus have enormous potential for human therapy.
Unlike embryonic stem cells, the human eggs used to create parthenogenetic stem cells are never fertilized and cannot become a human being. No viable embryo is ever harmed or destroyed.
Unlike SCNT cells, parthenogenetic stem cells require no genetic manipulation or insertion of foreign DNA.
No donor is every subjected to any additional physical risk beyond what she has already agreed to as part of the IVF procedure in which she elected to participate. In fact, all egg donors voluntarily participate through a very transparent, peer-reviewed, and medically supervised process. Protocols are approved by Independent Review Boards (IRBs) to protect the safety of donors and by an independent Stem Cell Research Oversight (SCRO) committee to insure compliance with state laws and research ethics, regulations established by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Human Research Protections, in addition to state-level requirements.
The cell lines that are produced from this method, unlike cell lines from embryonic stem cells or from SCNT, can potentially be matched to millions of people in the same way that an organ transplant is matched between donor and patient. In fact, by some estimates, as few as 100 parthenogenetic stem cell lines could provide immune-matched cells to over 50 percent of the world’s population, and could accelerate disease therapies and treatments for severe chronic conditions, including diabetes, spinal cord injuries, liver diseases, blinding diseases such as macular degeneration, and neural diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s.
The possibility of immune-matching to millions of persons can vastly reduce the potential costs relative to SCNT or embryonic stem cell technology, which create stem cell lines that can match only a few persons.
In summary, what we find particularly exciting about Parthenogenesis is that it addresses all the major issues of stem cell therapy. It is free from the traditional bioethical issues that have clouded federal policies towards stem cell research because parthenotes are derived from unfertilized eggs and cannot develop into human beings. Parthenogenesis is not cloning, and it does not involve the creation or destruction of a viable human life. Also, the creation of a parthenogenetic stem cell bank will not require a large number of human eggs and many individual donors, as has been a fear surrounding other stem cell approaches. Parthenogenesis is at once effective and efficient, and one line of parthenogenetic stem cells can be used to create treatments for millions of persons. This is not a situation where one line must be made for each patient treated.
To learn more about Parthenogenesis, visit http://www.internationalstemcell.com, or click on ISCO.OB at any financial web site for information about our company.
Source:
http://intlstemcell.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Related Post
- Tracking the Fruits of California Stem Cell Agency Research - September 1st, 2013
- UCLA Snags $3.6 Million from California Stem Cell Agency - September 1st, 2013
- Stem Cell Agency Seeks Stronger Ties with Possible Industry Funding Partners - September 1st, 2013
- UCLA Takes Four of 13 Awards Today; One Business Wins - September 1st, 2013
- $41 Million in California Stem Cell Grants Virtually Approved - September 1st, 2013
- Stem Cell Agency Pays Tribute to the Late Duane Roth - September 1st, 2013
- Skin in California’s Stem Cell Game - September 1st, 2013
- California Stem Cell Agency's $150,000 Search for Its Financial Future - August 25th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Researchers to Receive $70 Million Next Week - August 25th, 2013
- Flim-Flam Stem Cell Artists Targeted by CIRM - August 25th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Agency Spending: Where the Money Is Going - August 25th, 2013
- A $2 Million Bill: Outside Contracting by California Stem Cell Agency - August 25th, 2013
- New Ties to Big Pharma and Venture Capital Proposed at California Stem Cell Agency - August 25th, 2013
- Bonilla: Veto of Pay-for-Eggs Bill Shows Troubling Mindset - August 18th, 2013
- 'Butter and Eggs Money" and a Gubernatorial Veto - August 18th, 2013
- California Gov. Jerry Brown Vetoes Pay-for-Eggs Legislation - August 18th, 2013
- A $6 Billion Question: Progress of the California Stem Cell Agency - August 18th, 2013
- Duane Roth: Ecumenical Innovator for San Diego and Biotech - August 18th, 2013
- Stem Cell Agency's Duane Roth Eulogized at Memorial Services - August 18th, 2013
- 'Paradigm Shift' -- Researchers as Patient Advocates? - August 18th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Agency on Lacks: Informed Consent Cannot Remove All Questions - August 11th, 2013
- Californians Top List of Stem Cell Honorees - August 11th, 2013
- The Henrietta Lacks Story and Eggs, Money and Motherhood - August 11th, 2013
- Skloots, Collins and More on Henrietta Lacks' Cell Line Deal - August 11th, 2013
- Memorial Services Friday for Duane Roth, Co-vice chairman of the California Stem Cell Agency - August 11th, 2013
- CIRM's Roth Dies Following Bike Accident - August 11th, 2013
- Pay-for-Eggs Legislation Now Before California Gov. Jerry Brown - August 4th, 2013
- Comment re Pay-for-Eggs Item and Forbes Article - August 4th, 2013
- Pay-for-Eggs Legislation: A Comment on Risk - August 4th, 2013
- Skimpy Coverage of Alpha Clinic Concept Approval - August 4th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Agency Looking for New Home in Two Years - August 4th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Official Duane Roth in Improving Condition - July 28th, 2013
- Another $23 Million to Recruit Star Stem Cell Scientists to California - July 28th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Agency Launches $70 Million Alpha Stem Cell Clinic Project - July 28th, 2013
- Coming Up: Live Coverage of Today's California Stem Cell Meeting - July 28th, 2013
- Stem Cell Lines and Paid-for Eggs: Stem Cell Agency Delays Action on Easing Restrictions - July 28th, 2013
- $70 Million Alpha Stem Cell Clinic Project Garners Mainstream Media Attention - July 28th, 2013
- UCLA Researcher Calls for Easing of Restrictions on Stem Cell Lines Derived from Eggs From Paid Providers - July 28th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Agency to Commit 20 Percent of Remaining Cash - July 21st, 2013
- Paying for Human Eggs, Ivan Illich and Jerry Brown - July 21st, 2013
- California's $70 Million 'Alpha' Stem Cell Clinic Plan Headed for Approval Next Week - July 21st, 2013
- TV News Piece on Pay-for-Eggs Airs in Los Angeles, San Francisco - July 14th, 2013
- Shestack Resignation Letter: Heartfelt and Eloquent - July 14th, 2013
- Veto Campaign Launched on California Pay-For-Eggs Bill - July 14th, 2013
- Sacramento Mental Health Advocate Appointed to Stem Cell Agency Board - July 14th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Merger: Capricor and Niles Therapeutics - July 14th, 2013
- Pay-for-Eggs Legislation: Strange Bedfellows and Existential Questions - July 14th, 2013
- "Comfort News" for California's Stem Cell Research Effort - July 14th, 2013
- HIV Clinical Trial Hailed by California Stem Cell Agency - July 14th, 2013
- Eggs and Cash: Stem Cell Agency Considering Easing Restrictions on Stem Cell Lines Derived Using Payments - July 14th, 2013
- California Legislation Removing Ban on Payments for Eggs for Research Heads to Governor - July 14th, 2013
- California Legislation, Human Egg Sales and Profits - July 7th, 2013
- Challenge to WARF hESC Patents Cites Recent U.S. Supreme Court Decision - July 7th, 2013
- Cost of a Stem Cell Therapy? An Estimated $512,000 - June 30th, 2013
- Bluebird and Banking: Media Pluses for California Stem Cell Agency - June 30th, 2013
- International team submits IND application - June 23rd, 2013
- Pay-For-Eggs Legislation Draws More Media Attention - June 23rd, 2013
- Compensation for Human Eggs Approved by Key California Senate Committee, But Not For CIRM Researchers - June 16th, 2013
- Merksamer Makes Only Bid For Stem Cell Agency Lobbying Contract - June 16th, 2013
- Cellular Dynamics: California Stem Cell Agency Recipient Plans $57 Million IPO - June 9th, 2013
- Light Coverage of Cellular Dynamics IPO But One Exec Says It's Good for Stem Cell Biz - June 9th, 2013
- Pomeroy on Doing the Right Thing and Foster Care - June 9th, 2013
- Vatican Funding for California Stem Cell Agency? - June 2nd, 2013
- Bluebird bio of Massachusetts Still Waiting for California Stem Cell Money - June 2nd, 2013
- California's Alpha Stem Cell Clinics: Open in 2014, Six to Eight Locations - June 2nd, 2013
- Monterey Newspaper Chides California Stem Cell Agency - June 2nd, 2013
- Trounson Proposes $70 Million, Fast-Track Stem Cell Clinic Plan for California - June 2nd, 2013
- $70 Million Alpha Stem Cell Clinic Proposal Draws Reader Comment - June 2nd, 2013
- Sacramento Bee: Ongoing Conflict Problems No Help for Future Funding of Stem Cell Agency - June 2nd, 2013
- Multimillion Dollar Carrots for Stem Cell Research in California - May 26th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Agency: 5 Percent Budget Increase for Coming Fiscal Year - May 26th, 2013
- $36 Million Recruitment: Names of Researchers Being Lured to California - May 26th, 2013
- Stem Cell Agency Approves $36 million to Recruit Six Scientists to California - May 26th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Agency to Court Patient Groups This Summer - May 26th, 2013
- Nature Reports on Lee Hood Conflict Case - May 26th, 2013
- Grant Reviewer Conflict in $40 Million Round at California Stem Cell Agency - May 26th, 2013
- Text of CIRM Comments on Lee Hood Questions - May 26th, 2013
- Replicating Oregon Cloning in California: Views on the Legality - May 19th, 2013
- Oregon-style Stem Cell Cloning Research Illegal in California: No Pay for Eggs in Golden State - May 19th, 2013
- Weissman Says Oregon-style Stem Cell Research Could be Done in California - May 19th, 2013
Share
Comments are closed.
Personalized Gene Medicine
| Mesenchymal Stem Cells
| Stem Cell Treatment for Multiple Sclerosis
| Stem Cell Treatments
| Board Certified Stem Cell Doctors
| Stem Cell Medicine
| Personalized Stem Cells Therapy
| Stem Cell Therapy TV
| Individual Stem Cell Therapy
| Stem Cell Therapy Updates
| MD Supervised Stem Cell Therapy
| IPS Stem Cell Org
| IPS Stem Cell Net
| Genetic Medicine
| Gene Medicine
| Longevity Medicine
| Immortality Medicine
| Nano Medicine
| Gene Therapy MD
| Individual Gene Therapy
| Affordable Stem Cell Therapy
| Affordable Stem Cells
| Stem Cells Research
| Stem Cell Breaking Research