Page 247«..1020..246247248249..260270..»

$80 Million in Grants, Money for Viacyte and Blue-Ribbon Report on California Stem Cell Agency

By Dr. Matthew Watson

Directors of the California stem cell
agency are expected to give away $80 million next week to 20
fortunate researchers in addition to exploring a “commercialization
and industry engagement plan.”

The subjects are on tap for the Dec. 12 meeting in Los Angeles of the governing board of the $3 billion
research effort.
The $80 million grant round is aimed at
“career development of physician scientists working in
translational stem cell research.”

“This award will fund promising
physician scientists in the critical early stages of their careers as
independent investigators and faculty members establishing their own
laboratories and programs.” 

Summaries of the grant reviewers
comments and application scores should be available sometime this
week. The bare-bones agenda lacked elaboration on the
commercialization plan.
Directors are additionally scheduled to
hear a presentation on the blue-ribbon report by the Institute of
Medicine
for which the agency is paying $700,000. The report has been
17 months in the making and is scheduled to be released this
Thursday.
Other interesting matters are on the
table, although the agency has yet to produce background material
laying out any details. The subjects include:
  • More money – no amount yet specified
    – for Viacyte, Inc, of San Diego, which has received more than $36
    million from CIRM.
  • An update of the agency's response to
    the only performance audit conducted at the agency. The audit
    identified 27 areas where improvement is needed, but the governing
    board has not discussed the results publicly since they were
    disclosed last May.
  • Approval of the concept plan for
    another round of basic biology grants and adoption of conflict of
    interest code changes.

Interested parties will be able to take part at the meeting location in Los Angeles and teleconference locations in La Jolla, Oakland and UCSF. If you are interested in
the teleconference locations, you will need to contact the agency for more specific directions than are provided on the agenda.

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/RU_xC86oAyw/80-million-in-grants-money-for-viacyte.html

To Read More: $80 Million in Grants, Money for Viacyte and Blue-Ribbon Report on California Stem Cell Agency
categoriaStem Cell Therapy commentoComments Off on $80 Million in Grants, Money for Viacyte and Blue-Ribbon Report on California Stem Cell Agency | dataDecember 9th, 2012
Read All

Update on Move To Curb Researcher Appeals at California Stem Cell Agency

By Dr. Matthew Watson

Directors of the $3 billion California
stem cell agency are still mulling details of changes in their
free-wheeling and sometimes emotional appeals process for grant applications
that are rejected by the agency's reviewers.

A special task force of directors met last week
for the second time to discuss the likely alterations. Kevin McCormack, spokesman for the agency, said
the group made no decisions. Another meeting will be held later at a
date to be determined. The task force's recommendations will then go
before the full board, probably in late January.
McCormack said members of the panel
have asked for “more details regarding the process that would be
employed if the appeals and extraordinary petition processes were
merged.”
The agency has an odd, bifurcated
appeals process. Early in its existence, the agency said appeals of
reviewer decisions could be based only on conflicts of interest.
However, researchers have a right under state law to speak to the
governing board in public on any issue whatsoever. As some
researchers began to use that avenue to ask for reconsideration of
their applications, the CIRM board created what it called
“extraordinary petitions” in an effort to control the process and
limit appeals. Both the “appeals” and “extraordinary petitions”
are, in fact, appeals but on different grounds and employing different
mechanisms.
The task force was created in September
after directors complained about “arm-twisting” and “emotionally charged presentations” in connection with a record number of
appeals earlier this year.
Here is a link to an item about the task force's first meeting. Here is a link to an agency summary of the task force's deliberations prior to last week's meeting. The
transcript of the session should be available on the CIRM web site
within the next two weeks. It will be found under the meetings
section of the web and then under the heading for the task force's
November session.

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/Hkq7zcXyMsQ/update-on-move-to-curb-researcher.html

To Read More: Update on Move To Curb Researcher Appeals at California Stem Cell Agency
categoriaStem Cell Therapy commentoComments Off on Update on Move To Curb Researcher Appeals at California Stem Cell Agency | dataDecember 9th, 2012
Read All

WISE Surgical Solutions LLC Announces Project Hope: Helping People with Debilitating Conditions Including Arthritis …

By Dr. Matthew Watson

With millions of people in aggregate suffering from debilitating disease, reduced mobility, or relentless pain associated with various conditions, stem cell medicine is available now through WISE Surgical Solutions LLC by direct flight from some major cities to our Joint Commission International Accredited Johns Hopkins affiliated Punta Pacifica Hospital in Panama.

New York (PRWEB) December 06, 2012

Cathy Nenninger, Chief Executive Officer of WISE Surgical Solutions LLC, shared why this offering is important. When I ran wound centers up and down the east coast, I used to get calls from patients and family members desperate for treatments to help alleviate severe symptoms of ailments such as these. It was heartbreaking that we were not able to provide any type of help or hope to these patients. Granted, while the response and success of stem cell treatment in patients varies greatly and by disease, patients who are in extreme discomfort or experiencing reduced function or quality of life deserve to know that they have options available to them.

A significant element of PROJECT HOPE, continues Ms. Nenninger, is the opportunity for community funding of the treatment. Often, families and communities want to help someone by making donations that will collectively fund a surgery or procedure which in itself can add another chore to the already stressed world of a Care Captain (person seeking help for another); Our goal is to make the process easy. For more information on Project Hope, call (631) 942-6040 or for a quote for service, fill out a medical history form available at http://www.WISESurgicalSolutions.com.

WISE Surgical Solutions LLC is based out of New York and caters to companies and patients seeking quality healthcare at an affordable price inclusive of travel. Offerings include medical, dental and surgical procedures of most types, in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and stem cell medicine. Community & group funding as well as financing options are available for patients. Media relations inquiries can be directed to (631) 909-8538 or emailed to surgsolutions(at)optimum(dot)net.

Cathy M. Nenninger, MBA Wise Surgical Solutions LLC (631) 942-6040 Email Information

Here is the original post:
WISE Surgical Solutions LLC Announces Project Hope: Helping People with Debilitating Conditions Including Arthritis ...

To Read More: WISE Surgical Solutions LLC Announces Project Hope: Helping People with Debilitating Conditions Including Arthritis …
categoriaUncategorized commentoComments Off on WISE Surgical Solutions LLC Announces Project Hope: Helping People with Debilitating Conditions Including Arthritis … | dataDecember 6th, 2012
Read All

Biotechnology: Things you should know about Gene Therapy

By Dr. Matthew Watson

Introduction

Genetic disorders are becoming common nowadays due to stressful modern lifestyle. Latest technologies are the added values to create many genetic disorders. To overcome the disorders, Gene therapy is a blessing. In order to compensate abnormal genes and make a good gene, genetic material is introduced into cells. In this way, mutated gene will act as a normal gene. Let us see in detail.

Ways to insert the gene

There are indirect ways need to be followed to make a gene to function as if it is inserted directly does not function. Carrier also called as vector is used to deliver the gene. In the place of vectors, virus play the role as they are getting modified and hence people are not affected with new diseases when it is integrated into the chromosome of the human cell.

The vectors need to get injected to specific tissue in the body or outwardly patient’s cell is removed and exposed to the vector. In either of the ways need to be again returned to the patient. Successful treatment makes proper genes and genetic disorders get solved.

Gene therapy for treating cancer

Cancer is the dangerous disease and there are many ways to cure cancer including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. But cancerous cells in due course again spread and hence it is a deadly disease. Gene therapy is the best way discovered nowadays for treating cancer.
Let us see the basic fundamentals of cells. cells include packets of data in genes, created either from DNA or RNA. Sequence is there for DNA and if it is in the order, there will be no problem. But at the same time If there is disorder occurs in portion of the genes either turning or changing the position, cells lost their control and abnormal growth is seen which result in cancerous tumors. It can spread in mouth, breast, lung etc.,

Specialists in Gene therapy analyze the patient’s criticality first and follow the treatment procedures. One way is they replace missing or mutated genes into wholesome genes. Inserting totally new genes for fighting cancer, placing DNA into cancerous cells to undergo chemotherapy and radiation or injecting bad gene to destroy them etc., Mesothelioma type of cancers are not at all responded in formal therapies and hence one need to undergo gene therapy essentially. Need to have consultations with doctors to overcome their deadly disease.

Gene therapy importance

Doctors decide whether gene therapy is suitable by the following approaches. If genetic disorders are from mutations in one or more genes or whether a normal copy of the gene that is available in the patient is enough to fix the problems in the affected cells, then doctors determine that gene therapy will be more helpful rather than going for traditional methods.

Conclusion

Genetic engineering is a vast topic. Latest Science innovations in the field of genetic engineering yields for gene therapy. Doctors and scientists together working to find out whether gene therapy is the best suitable way for treating deadly diseases like cancer and others. Let us salute for the positive force of gene therapy.

 

Source:
http://www.biotechblog.org/entry/biotechnology-gene-therapy/

To Read More: Biotechnology: Things you should know about Gene Therapy
categoriaUncategorized commentoComments Off on Biotechnology: Things you should know about Gene Therapy | dataDecember 2nd, 2012
Read All

DuBiotech: The Silicon Valley of Biotechnology – Genetic Engineering News

By Dr. Matthew Watson


Genetic Engineering News
DuBiotech: The Silicon Valley of Biotechnology
Genetic Engineering News
Ahmed Taha from DuBiotech, the Dubai Biotechnology & Research Park, has two questions for GEN readers: “Do you have a biotech idea that you'd like to develop rapidly, conveniently, and inexpensively?” Or alternatively, “Do you have an existing biotech ...

and more »

Source:
http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNEk4rtzm46lE_25U_ZbxuqBzc6dnA&url=http://www.genengnews.com/insight-and-intelligence/dubiotech-the-silicon-valley-of-biotechnology/77899729/

To Read More: DuBiotech: The Silicon Valley of Biotechnology – Genetic Engineering News
categoriaUncategorized commentoComments Off on DuBiotech: The Silicon Valley of Biotechnology – Genetic Engineering News | dataDecember 2nd, 2012
Read All

Gene Patents Draw High Court Review in Biotechnology Test – Businessweek

By Dr. Matthew Watson


Today's THV
Gene Patents Draw High Court Review in Biotechnology Test
Businessweek
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to consider whether human genes can be patented, taking up an issue that has split the medical community and will shape the future of personalized health care and the biotechnology industry. The justices yesterday said ...
US Supreme Court to Review Patents on Human GenesWall Street Journal
Supremes to Decide Others Can Own Your GenesNational Review Online (blog)
US top court to rule if companies can patent genesAFP
Philadelphia Inquirer
all 313 news articles »

Source:
http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNHkE9GDvUDADfqatAhvvW4OD3C8XA&url=http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-11-30/gene-patents-draw-high-court-review-in-biotechnology-test

To Read More: Gene Patents Draw High Court Review in Biotechnology Test – Businessweek
categoriaUncategorized commentoComments Off on Gene Patents Draw High Court Review in Biotechnology Test – Businessweek | dataDecember 2nd, 2012
Read All

Six steps to fighting non-compliant cell therapy treatments. — The stuff of grey shades, spades, ivory towers and (ahem) balls.

By Dr. Matthew Watson



Today an article entitled "Professors Critique Stem Cell Medical Tourism" appeared in the online version of The Harvard Crimson summarizing a recent panel discussion hosted in least in part by Harvard Law School assistant professor I. Glenn Cohen and University of Alberta law professor Timothy Caulfield.  The article concludes thusly:

The panelists emphasized that more accurate information should be provided to the public regarding stem cell treatments.

Certainly what Cohen and Caulfield concluded is true.  It has now been true for several years.  We keep saying it.  But are we listening to ourselves?  Are we doing anything meaningful to address this?  If so, is it enough?

Sadly (in my opinion, of course) the answer is 'not nearly enough'.*

For several years now, experts and organizations in the cell therapy sector have been saying that more must be done to educate and assist patients who are seeking stem cell or other cell-based treatments which do not comply with existing regulation and/or widely accepted medical or clinical research practices (hereafter called "non-compliant cell therapies").  
In my opinion, attempts to address this need by the sector's professional organizations, while important, have been unnecessarily feeble, not gone nearly far enough, and legitimately appear by many to be high-minded and pedantic. 



Almost all efforts to-date to address this issue by ISSCR, CIRM, ISCT and others including authors such as Caufield - as laudable and needed as they are - have been focused on helping distinguish between compliant and non-compliant treatments (and providers).  This is certainly much needed.  But what is left, I submit, is an even greater unmet need.


What almost all efforts to-date have failed to recognize or address is that where real help is needed is in helping patients distinguish between the many shades of grey among non-compliant treatments (and providers).

Emerging organizations like ICMS (now in partnership with AABB) have recognized and attempted to address this unmet need through a commitment to create some level of certification, accreditation or standardization of clinics participating in this business of selling non-compliant cell therapies.

While their intentions appear on-target as one meaningful way to address this unmet need and certainly their willingness to tackle this issue in a bold way is to be lauded, the ICMS is inexperienced and underfunded.  I remain hopeful that now through their new partnership with AABB they will be able to provide something that really addresses this unmet need but the jury remains out on whether they will succeed.
Anyone who has followed this blog and/or my threads on LinkedIn know I have been thinking about and discussing this issue for some time. In a desire to move to very concrete suggestions, I want to recommend the following 6 steps to my industry colleagues and professional organizations:

1.  50 shades of grey. Let's admit that this issue is not black-and-white but, as is almost always, involves a broad spectrum of grey in the middle.  


In addition to helping patients distinguish between compliant and non-compliant treatments (and providers) there are a lot of ways to help patients distinguish between non-compliant cell therapy  treatments (and providers) which are more or less risky.  


Let me use examples.  

On the one end of the non-compliant spectrum I would put forward a clinical like Okyanos Heart Institute which (as I understand it) intends to provide cell therapy treatments in the Bahamas to US patients using the Cytori system for cardiac conditions as soon as such treatments are perfectly legal and available to European patients but years before such treatments will be available in the US.  
Non-compliant?  Yes.  But certainly no evidence I'm aware of to support a belief that seeking treatment from them would be any more risky than travelling to Europe to receive the same treatment in a manner perfectly compliant with European regulations.
On the other end of the spectrum are the kinds of clinics highlighted recently by 60 minutes or which are the subject of ongoing lawsuits.

In between - in my opinion - are clinics like Stem Cell Institute and StemCellMD.

2.  Step out of the ivory tower.  Let's recognize that in certain circumstances patients are going to go pay for non-compliant cell therapies and we must do more to help these patients than simply shake our finger and tell them they mustn't.
For some, helping patients distinguish between the better and worst non-compliant clinics might involve a fair amount of nose-pinching but this is the equivalent of the methadone clinic for heroine addicts.  By supporting the better of two evils we are not endorsing it as 'good', we are simply recognizing it is better.

This is a recognition that we cannot just abandon people because they made (or are going to make) decisions with which we ultimately disapprove.   It is a recognition that sometimes the most righteous thing to do is not only to help people do what we would ideally want them to do but to help them do the best they can in their circumstances and on their terms - even terms with which we may ultimately disagree.


3.  A risk-based strategy.  Let's recognize that even the FDA triages their response to non-compliance and we would do well to do the same.  As a regulated industry we are perfectly comfortable with risk-based assessments and it should be applied here.  
Rather than treating all non-compliance as equally evil, let's apply some risk-based analysis to the situation and develop a strategy to root out the worst (highest-risk) offenders.  
4.  This is not just about tourism anymore - the problem has come home to roost. Let's recognize that this is no longer just a problem of patients leaving a regulated jurisdiction seeking a non-compliant treatment in a jurisdiction with no or more permissive regulation.  
Non-compliant treatments are growing rapidly even in the most highly regulated jurisdictions.  No where is this more true than in the United States.
5. Take responsibility.  Let's recognize that we cannot expect our regulatory enforcement agencies to do it all.  They are under-staffed and under-funded.  They - and the people we all serve - need our active participation in dealing with offenders and those risking patient safety.  
From a self-interested perspective, we owe it to our industry to help crack down on those who put the credibility and legitimacy of cell therapies at highest risk.
6.  Let's grow a pair and call a spade a spade.  If a non-compliant clinic is providing treatments that we believe represent a high-risk to patient safety and the industry's credibility, let's have the b*lls to call them on it.  They can't sue everyone.  
ISSCR backed down on their stem cell tourism initiative after being threatened by lawsuits. Who has stepped up in their absence?  Individual bloggers and authors like Paul Knoeplfer, Alexey Bresenev, Leigh Turner, and myself all who have been threatened with litigation several times for having the audacity to call certain non-compliant clinics out for what we deem - in our own risk-based analysis - to be the worst offenders.  

By way of example, several of my colleagues have recently committed to doing all they can do to call out David Steenblock and his non-compliant cell therapy treatments, many of which are provided at his clinic in California for a plethora of conditions.  In their opinion, many of his treatments represent some of worst examples of non-compliance in the United States right now.  There are many faces or fronts to his practice including http://www.davidsteenblock.comhttp://www.stemcellmd.org, http://www.strokedoctor.com, http://www.davidsteenblock.net, etc.

If, as an industry, we act with more cohesion (collaboratively applying a risk-based assessment of non-compliant clinics) and speak with a more cohesive voice in terms of calling out those clinics and treatments which we conclude pose the greatest risk based on an objective set of criterion, this will present a multi-pronged, formidable and existential threat to clinics that they can't ignore or threaten away.
___

I will be taking these 6 recommendations to any organization who will listen.  I hope you will consider doing the same.



In the meantime - as always - I welcome your comments.


___

* This is my opinion not necessarily the opinion of any clients I represent or organizations I serve. Judge me - not them - accordingly.


Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CellTherapyBlog/~3/2b8Ffw4b1pU/six-steps-to-fighting-non-compliant.html

To Read More: Six steps to fighting non-compliant cell therapy treatments. — The stuff of grey shades, spades, ivory towers and (ahem) balls.
categoriaRegenerative Medicine commentoComments Off on Six steps to fighting non-compliant cell therapy treatments. — The stuff of grey shades, spades, ivory towers and (ahem) balls. | dataDecember 2nd, 2012
Read All

World Changing Ideas 2012 (preview)

By Dr. Matthew Watson

Scientists and engineers dream about big advances that could change the world, and then they try to create them. On the following pages, Scientific American reveals 10 innovations that could be game changers: an artificial alternative to DNA, oil that cleans water, pacemakers powered by our blood, and more. These are not pie-in-the-sky notions but practical breakthroughs that have been proved or prototyped and are poised to scale up greatly. Each has the potential to make what may now seem impossible possible. -- The Editors

[More]

Add to digg
Add to StumbleUpon
Add to Reddit
Add to Facebook
Add to del.icio.us
Email this Article


Source:
http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=b2ba3706ed26d9143fea77a07b425555

To Read More: World Changing Ideas 2012 (preview)
categoriaUncategorized commentoComments Off on World Changing Ideas 2012 (preview) | dataDecember 2nd, 2012
Read All

Stem Cell Board Members Lubin and Sheehy Honored

By Dr. Matthew Watson


A couple of members of the governing
board of the $3 billion California stem cell agency were honored for
their work this month.

Jeff Sheehy
UCSF Photo
One is Jeff Sheehy, a UCSF
communications manager and nationally known HIV/AIDS advocate, who
has served on the CIRM board since its inception. He was named by POZ
magazine as one of the top 100 “soldiers” in the fight against
HIV/AIDS.
CIRM's Amy Adams filed an item on
Sheehy on the agency's blog yesterday. She said, 

“Jeff once told me
that when he joined CIRM’s board eight years ago, he didn’t see a
role for stem cells in an HIV/AIDS treatment. Now, CIRM has committed
$40 million toward HIV/AIDS projects and two teams of researchers
from City
of Hope 
and UCLA are
working toward clinical trials.”

Sheehy was also invited to the White
House to commemorate World AIDs day Dec. 1.
Bert Lubin
Childrens Hospital Photo
Also honored was Bert Lubin, CEO of
Childrens Hospital in Oakland, where he has worked since 1973, a
remarkable achievement in today's world of transitory employment. The
San Francisco Business Times named Lubin as the “most admiredCEO” in the San Francisco Bay Area. The newspaper said that since
he took charge at Childrens in 2009,

“He recruited a new senior management
team, chopped away at the pediatric hospital’s operating deficit
and worked to heal relationships with the local community and
governmental and political leaders that were deeply frayed...”

On a personal note, a friend who has
long volunteered at Childrens gives him high marks as well, citing
several encounters where he exceeded the usual CEO effort.

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/9b9s3mW2ebM/stem-cell-board-members-lubin-and.html

To Read More: Stem Cell Board Members Lubin and Sheehy Honored
categoriaStem Cell Therapy commentoComments Off on Stem Cell Board Members Lubin and Sheehy Honored | dataDecember 2nd, 2012
Read All

Diane Winokur, Veteran ALS Patient Advocate, Named to California Stem Cell Agency Board

By Dr. Matthew Watson


Longtime ALS patient advocate Diane
Winokur
of San Francisco, who has lost two sons to the disease, has
been appointed to the governing board of the $3 billion California
stem cell agency.

She fills the vacancy left by David
Serrano Sewell
, who resigned from the 29-member panel earlier this
year after serving since the agency's inception. CIRM has 10 patient advocates
on its board.
Diane Winokur
Photo -- Legal Momentum
Winokur is well-known in ALS circles.
She sat for five years on the governing board of the national ALS
advocacy group and currently serves on the board for the California
state group, the Golden West chapter. She also served for six years on the board of
trustees for the Sanford- Burnham Institute in La Jolla, which has received $37 million from the stem cell agency. She left Sanford in 2011.
Last summer Winokur appeared before the
CIRM board to successfully seek approval of an $18 million ALS grant
that was rejected by the agency's reviewers. Researcher Clive
Svendsen
of Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles appealed the denial to the
full board and was supported in emotional testimony by other patient
advocates as well, including persons with the affliction.(See here for video of some of the testimony.)
The agency has awarded about $30.6
million, including the Svendsen grant, for research directly related
to ALS.
Golden
West issued a press release Nov. 21, lauding the Winokur appointment
by California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom. The release quoted Lucie Bruijn,
chief scientist of The ALS Association, as saying,

"Her
contributions have been invaluable and she will be a tremendous asset
in moving the ALS research field forward through CIRM
funding."

The stem cell agency posted a blog item
on Winokur's appointment in addition to a press release. CIRM
Chairman J.T. Thomas said,

“Her knowledge, expertise and
leadership will be a tremendous addition to the ICOC (the stem cell
agency governing board) and help guide us in our work.”

Patient advocate Don Reed of Fremont,
Ca., described Winokur in a 2008 blog item as “small, elegant, full
of energy, an exclamation point of a person.”

(Editor's note: Based on information from CIRM and Golden West, an earlier version of this item incorrectly stated that Winokur is a current member of the Sanford-Burnham board.

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/dITcyP7WJbs/diane-winokur-veteran-als-patient.html

To Read More: Diane Winokur, Veteran ALS Patient Advocate, Named to California Stem Cell Agency Board
categoriaStem Cell Therapy commentoComments Off on Diane Winokur, Veteran ALS Patient Advocate, Named to California Stem Cell Agency Board | dataDecember 2nd, 2012
Read All

Knoepfler Award Update: More than a Baker’s Dozen Nominated

By Dr. Matthew Watson


As of this week, 14 persons have been
recommended for the Knoepfler “Stem Cell Person of the Year”
Award.

The total was reported by Paul
Knoepfler
, the UC Davis stem cell scientist and blogger, who is
putting up $1,000 for the winner of the honor.
Knoepfler announced his award plans earlier this month, declaring that he wanted to recognize scientists or others who “truly made a difference” in the stem
field. Risk-taking is one important criteria.
Knoepfler said,

“It’s something that I’m hoping I
can do every year. It would also be a reward for risk taking,
creativity and be breaking with tradition and be something new in
that regard.” 

The award has drawn some modest
attention outside of Knoepfler's blog. A few days after he introduced
the award on his blog, UC Davis decided to put out a press release and video on it. The California Stem Cell Report followed with an item. Then CIRM blogged it as well.
So far we have not detected any stories
about the award in the mainstream media, but things could change.
Deadline for entries is Dec. 17.

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/cLYLc5HQUSY/knoepfler-award-update-more-than-bakers.html

To Read More: Knoepfler Award Update: More than a Baker’s Dozen Nominated
categoriaStem Cell Therapy commentoComments Off on Knoepfler Award Update: More than a Baker’s Dozen Nominated | dataDecember 2nd, 2012
Read All

Autologous Cell Therapy Market expected to reach $2.2 billion by 2017, growing at a CAGR of 21% : MarketsandMarkets

By Dr. Matthew Watson

Autologous Cell Therapy Market reserach report gives a detailed analysis about state of the art of both autologous stem cell and non-stem cell treatments. It includes the current advances and applications of the technology and trends in terms of market size and growth of autologous cellular therapies in medical treatments globally.

(PRWEB) November 30, 2012

Browse ACT market research data tables/figures spread through 111 slides and in-depth TOC on Autologous Cell Therapy (ACT) Market (2012 - 2017).

http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/autologous-cell-therapy-market-837.html

Early buyers will receive 10% customization on reports.

There is a wide market potential and favorable landscape for adoption across many geographical locations of the world. During the forecast period, these technologies are expected to revolutionize the area of bio-pharma and personalized medicine. High incidence and lack of effective treatment for several diseases will drive the ACT technology in developed and developing nations.

Investment activities, for past five years are actively held in research and developments, attracting interests of cell therapy industry firms, medical centers and academic institutions. ACT potential can be demonstrated by mergers, collaborations, acquisitions and partnerships that happened actively between the ACT technology developing companies in past three years. Development of sophisticated automation devices for cell expansion and culture process for use in the treatment is one of the emerging trends of ACT market.

The global market for ACT is valued around $650 million by 2011 with a CAGR of 21%. Several products and technologies of ACT are in pipeline which is expected to hit the market during the forecast period, which will result in increased growth rate.

About MarketsandMarkets

MarketsandMarkets is a global market research and consulting company based in the U.S. We publish strategically analyzed market research reports and serve as a business intelligence partner to Fortune 500 companies across the world. MarketsandMarkets also provides multi-client reports, company profiles, databases, and custom research services.

Read the original post:
Autologous Cell Therapy Market expected to reach $2.2 billion by 2017, growing at a CAGR of 21% : MarketsandMarkets

To Read More: Autologous Cell Therapy Market expected to reach $2.2 billion by 2017, growing at a CAGR of 21% : MarketsandMarkets
categoriaUncategorized commentoComments Off on Autologous Cell Therapy Market expected to reach $2.2 billion by 2017, growing at a CAGR of 21% : MarketsandMarkets | dataDecember 1st, 2012
Read All

SCMOM 2012_NeoStem – Video

By Dr. Matthew Watson


SCMOM 2012_NeoStem
NeoStem, Inc. is an emerging technology leader in the fast-developing cell therapy market. Its business strategy combines a state-of-the-art contract development and manufacturing subsidiary, Progenitor Cell Therapy, LLC, with a medically important cell therapy product development program. NeoStem #39;s most clinically advanced therapeutic, AMR-001, is being developed at its Amorcyte subsidiary, which is enrolling patients in a Phase 2 trial for preservation of heart function after a heart attack. Athelos Corporation, also a NeoStem subsidiary, is in early stage clinical exploration of a T-cell therapy for autoimmune conditions. Pre-clinical assets include our VSELTM Technology platform and our mesenchymal stem cell product candidate for regenerative medicine. http://www.neostem.com Presenter: Jonathan Sackner-Bernstein, NeoStem, Inc.From:AllianceRegenMedViews:4 1ratingsTime:14:54More inScience Technology

See more here:
SCMOM 2012_NeoStem - Video

To Read More: SCMOM 2012_NeoStem – Video
categoriaUncategorized commentoComments Off on SCMOM 2012_NeoStem – Video | dataNovember 29th, 2012
Read All

Different organ-derived stem cell injections improve heart function in rats

By Dr. Matthew Watson

Washington, November 28 (ANI): When mesenchymal cells derived from skeletal muscle (SM-MSCs) or adipose tissue (ADSCs) were injected into the heart muscle (myocardium) of separate groups of laboratory rats that had suffered a myocardial infarction, rats in both groups experienced significantly improved left ventricle function and smaller infarct size after cell therapy, a study has found.

The study, carried out by researchers at Oslo University Hospital and the Norwegian Center for Stem cell Research, Oslo University, sought to determine if MSCs from different organs would result in different functional outcomes.

"Despite advances in revascularization and medical therapy, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and heart failure are still important causes of morbidity and mortality in industrialized countries," said study co-author Dr. Jan E. Brinchmann of the Norwegian center for Stem Cell Research at Oslo University Hospital, Oslo.

"AMI leads to a permanent loss of contractile elements in the heart and the formation of fibrous scarring. Regeneration of contractile myocardium has been a target of cell therapy for more than a decade," he added.

According to Dr. Brinchmann, MSCs tolerate hypoxia, secrete angiogenic factors and have been shown to improve vascularization; thus, they have properties suggesting that they may beneficially impact AMI, chronic heart failure and angina pectoris after cell transplantation.

Following injection into the "border zone" and infarct area of immunodeficient rats one week after induced myocardial infarction, the researchers used echocardiography to measure myocardial function and other analyses to measure the size of scaring, density of blood vessels in the scar, and the health of myocardial tissues.

"Our results showed that intramyocardial injection of both ADSCs and SM-MSCs one week after AMI led to a substantial decrease in infarct size and a significant improvement in left ventricle function when compared with injections of cell culture medium alone," concluded the researchers.

"There was a trend toward better functional improvement in the SM-MSC group when compared to the ADSC group, but this did not reach significance," they added.

They concluded that many questions remain unanswered, including the question of whether MSCs isolated from different organisms could result in different functional outcomes.

Other unanswered questions relate to the optimal time delay between the onset of myocardial infarction and injection of MSCs. These cells do, however, still appear to be "a potentially interesting adjuvant treatment modality for selected patients following acute myocardial infarction," they concluded.

Original post:
Different organ-derived stem cell injections improve heart function in rats

To Read More: Different organ-derived stem cell injections improve heart function in rats
categoriaUncategorized commentoComments Off on Different organ-derived stem cell injections improve heart function in rats | dataNovember 29th, 2012
Read All

Professors Critique Stem Cell Medical Tourism

By Dr. Matthew Watson

A panel at the Harvard Law School Wednesday discussed the ethical debate over the use of embryonic stem cells in the United States, focusing on the burgeoning controversy surrounding the role of stem cell therapy in medical tourism.

Medical tourism, in which patients travel internationally to gain access to specific health care services, has become increasingly common, panelists said. They said that reasons for medical tourism range from basic hip replacement surgery to black market organ sales. As most stem cell therapies are not approved in the United States, numerous patients are going abroad to countries like China and Russia where treatment is legal.

Panelist I. Glenn Cohen, an assistant professor at the Law School, said that it was probable that a Chinese stem cell facility performs several hundred thousand of these treatments yearly. He said that numerous celebrities, including football quarterback Peyton Manning, have reportedly traveled abroad to receive stem cell treatment not approved by the FDA.

A number of facilities claim to use stem cells to cure a wide array of diseases. University of Alberta law professor Timothy Caulfield, another panelist, pointed out that a simple Google search leads potential patients to a plethora of websites which claim that diseases such as autism and cancer can be cured through stem cell therapy.

Its being offered as routine, its being offered as safe, its being offered as effective, Caulfield said, citing his own 2008 study on the subject, Of course, none of them being offered matched what the scientific literature said.

According to American history professor Jill Lepore, the hyper-acceleration of enthusiasm for stem cell therapy is reminiscent of a century ago when science journalism and government funding for science research began to blossom. Lepore pointed out how public excitement over scientific procedures has affected society in the past, popularizing cryonics research and the work of Eugene Steinach, who claimed his vasectomy operation reversed the aging process.

Panelists said that one issue with stem cell tourism is the number of health risks associated with such procedures, citing a number of instances where stem cell therapy caused serious harm.

They also noted that public discussion about stem cell therapy has been markedly positive, lending an air of legitimacy to stem cell therapy that hasnt been validated by research.

Articles criticizing stem cell tourism, on the other hand, have generally received a less favorable response. Caulfield told the audience that when he co-wrote an article in The Atlantic criticizing stem cell therapy, he was accused as being a nutball Canadian socialist bioethicist.

The panelists emphasized that more accurate information should be provided to the public regarding stem cell treatments.

Link:
Professors Critique Stem Cell Medical Tourism

To Read More: Professors Critique Stem Cell Medical Tourism
categoriaUncategorized commentoComments Off on Professors Critique Stem Cell Medical Tourism | dataNovember 29th, 2012
Read All

Deftones' Chi Cheng's family consider stem cell therapy to aid recovery

By Dr. Matthew Watson

November 25, 2012 12:54

Former bassist is said to be still in a "partially conscious state" four years on from car accident.

Photo: Tom Oxley/NME

Former Deftones bassist Chi Cheng's family are considering stem cell therapy to aid his recovery from a car accident which put him in a coma in 2008.

Cheng is said to be in a "partially conscious state" and is unable to speak, although he can move his legs on command. The bassist has been in and out of hospitals over the past four years and only got home to recover in June this year.

Now, according to Revolver Magazine, the family is considering alternative therapy in order to speed up Cheng's recovery, as they say the last few months have been a struggle for him.

His brother, Ming Cheng, said: "Once his health gets a little better, we'll start looking into other options...but they don't even do it (stem cell therapy) in the US yet.

"It's a miracle he's still with us," he added. "He's alive and kicking and he's fighting, and I think there's a reason for it. I'm hoping there's a light at the end of the tunnel for Chi."

Deftones released their new album 'Koi No Yokan' on November 12. You can stream the new record, which features 'Entomb (Dazzle)', 'Swerve City', 'Graphic Nature', 'Goon Squad' and 'Leathers', below.

The band tour the UK in 2013. They will play five dates, kicking off at Glasgow's Barrowland on February 15, before heading to Nottingham, Manchester, Birmingham and finishing at London's 02 Brixton Academy (20).

View post:
Deftones' Chi Cheng's family consider stem cell therapy to aid recovery

To Read More: Deftones' Chi Cheng's family consider stem cell therapy to aid recovery
categoriaUncategorized commentoComments Off on Deftones' Chi Cheng's family consider stem cell therapy to aid recovery | dataNovember 25th, 2012
Read All

Biotechnology organization sees IP rights essential – China Daily

By Dr. Matthew Watson


China Daily
Biotechnology organization sees IP rights essential
China Daily
"A patent often brings far greater value than one could ever imagine," said Dr Terence L.T. Lau, chief operating officer and general manager of Hong Kong Biotechnology Organization (HKBIO), which innovates the patented biotech product - H5 series of ...

Source:
http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNEOdlxI8xurAY3bXNV_hXzfJx-45A&url=http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2012-11/20/content_15945771.htm

To Read More: Biotechnology organization sees IP rights essential – China Daily
categoriaUncategorized commentoComments Off on Biotechnology organization sees IP rights essential – China Daily | dataNovember 25th, 2012
Read All

Nature Biotechnology Study Highlights New Myelin Specific Approach to Treat … – The Herald | HeraldOnline.com

By Dr. Matthew Watson


Daily Mail
Nature Biotechnology Study Highlights New Myelin Specific Approach to Treat ...
The Herald | HeraldOnline.com
SARATOGA, Calif. — The Myelin Repair Foundation (MRF) today announced the results of a new peer-reviewed research study published in Nature Biotechnology highlighting a targeted, novel approach for multiple sclerosis (MS). By utilizing the Myelin ...
Nanoparticles deliver antigen to trick the immune system in MSFierceDrugDelivery
MS: Nanoparticle Discovery May Halt MS Without Total Immune System ...Guardian Express
Nanoparticles Show Potential for Treating MSCBS 47

all 68 news articles »

Source:
http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNErhLSVVXGN3nY6iYOnxa7W-b-7lA&url=http://www.heraldonline.com/2012/11/19/4426106/nature-biotechnology-study-highlights.html

To Read More: Nature Biotechnology Study Highlights New Myelin Specific Approach to Treat … – The Herald | HeraldOnline.com
categoriaUncategorized commentoComments Off on Nature Biotechnology Study Highlights New Myelin Specific Approach to Treat … – The Herald | HeraldOnline.com | dataNovember 25th, 2012
Read All

California Stem Cell Agency Still in Talks on $40 Million for StemCells, Inc.

By Dr. Matthew Watson


The California stem cell agency and
StemCells, Inc., are still trying to reach agreement on a deal in
which the company would receive $40 million from the state's
taxpayer-funded research effort.

The sticking point is the $40 million
in matching funds required from the Newark, Ca., firm under the terms
of the two awards approved in July and September. The latter award
was okayed on a 7-5 vote by the governing board after it was rejected
twice by the agency's reviewers.
On Monday the California Stem Cell
Report
queried the agency about the status of the awards. Kevin
McCormack
, the agency's spokesman, replied,

“We are still in talks with them over
the terms of the funding. Hopefully, we'll have an agreement soon.”

He did not elaborate further.
CIRM staff normally reviews
applications after they are approved by the agency's governing board
to be sure that all conditions are being met. However, in the case of
the September award to StemCells, Inc., CIRM's governing board took
the unusual step of publicly stating that the firm must demonstrate
it has the $20 million in matching funds before it receives any
payments from CIRM. The board did not take that sort of public
position on the $20 million grant approved earlier in the summer,
although matching funds are required in that case as well.
The former chairman of the $3 billion
stem cell agency, Robert Klein, appeared twice before the board to
lobby for approval of the second award to StemCells, Inc., which is a
publicly traded firm.. It was the first such appearance by Klein
before his former colleagues since leaving the agency in June 2011.
Action on the StemCells, Inc., awards
attracted attention from the Los Angeles Times last month. Pulitzer
Prize-winning columnist Michael Hiltzik wrote that the process was “redolent of cronyism.” He said a “charmed relationship”
existed among StemCells, Inc., its “powerful friends” and the
stem cell agency.

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/MeZfo2qdxDQ/california-stem-cell-agency-still-in.html

To Read More: California Stem Cell Agency Still in Talks on $40 Million for StemCells, Inc.
categoriaStem Cell Therapy commentoComments Off on California Stem Cell Agency Still in Talks on $40 Million for StemCells, Inc. | dataNovember 25th, 2012
Read All

Texas Flap Looms Over California Stem Cell Agency’s Grant Appeals

By Dr. Matthew Watson


In nine days, the California stem cell
agency plans to take another crack at finding ways to curb its
free-wheeling appeal process involving scientists whose applications
for millions have been rejected by reviewers.

It is a matter of considerable interest
to researchers who need the cash to keep their labs running and remain in good standing with their host institutions.
The stem cell agency's governing board this fall created a task force to deal with the appeals issue after a
record-breaking number of researchers made public appeals featuring
emotional patient advocates. Even the former chairman of the agency,
Robert Klein
, made a two-time pitch for one applicant. Board members
later complained publicly about “arm-twisting,” lobbying and“emotionally charged presentations.”
The agenda for the Nov. 30 task force
meeting in Oakland -- with teleconferencing sites in San Francisco,
Irvine, Palo Alto, Seattle and Rochester, N.Y. -- contains few clues
on what the panel is hoping to specifically accomplish in next week's
90-minute session.
But interested researchers can check
the transcript from the Oct. 24 meeting, during which CIRM President
Alan Trounson described the problem as “very critical.” He said,

“I think this is a very serious
matter that could really bite us very hard in a similar way to what's
happened in Texas. Unless we come up with some kind of process that
really addresses the science, it's a very large concern.”

Trounson's Texas reference was to the
mass resignations of reviewers at that state's $3 billion cancer
research effort. Questions have been raised about integrity of its grant review process and the program's political and biotech industry
relationships. James Drew of the Dallas Morning News produced a bit of an overview this week. In another piece, Eric Berger of the
Houston Chronicle provided quotes from emails from the infighting on
a controversial $18 million grant.
Changes in California's grant appeal process may well
be also discussed at the agency's board meeting Dec. 12 in Los Angeles.
The board hopes to wrap up its action by late January.
Here is a link to an item with more specifics on material presented to the task force in October. Here is a link to an August 2012 list of articles and documents related to the CIRM appeals process.
Interested parties can address comments
to the agency at info@cirm.ca.gov.   

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/5vUXCLMoJz8/texas-flaps-looms-over-california-stem.html

To Read More: Texas Flap Looms Over California Stem Cell Agency’s Grant Appeals
categoriaStem Cell Therapy commentoComments Off on Texas Flap Looms Over California Stem Cell Agency’s Grant Appeals | dataNovember 25th, 2012
Read All

Page 247«..1020..246247248249..260270..»


Copyright :: 2025