CIRM addresses some tough questions. Is it all just glass towers and basic research?
By Dr. Matthew Watson
CIRM: “To support and advance stem cell research and regenerative medicine under the highest ethical and medical standards for the discovery and development of cures, therapies, diagnostics and research technologies to relieve human suffering from chronic disease and injury.”
CIRM: For-profit entities have been and currently are eligible for CIRM funding covering stages of research which range from basic biology programs (in which industry has shown little interest) through Phase II clinical trials. Of these programs, 13% have been awarded to companies thus far. Having built 12 state of the art stem cell facilities and having seeded the field with training and other types of grants of similar purpose, CIRM is now focusing on funding translational and clinical programs.
This is where companies' primary interests are and we expect greater company participation in our translation and clinical Request for Application. The translation and clinical awards programs provide for much larger awards as compared to the basic research and the overall amount of later stage funding is significantly larger than the earlier basic research awards. The number of awards made in the translational and clinical development funding rounds is much less than in the basic science area.
CIRM’s Strategic Partnership Funding Program is a cornerstone of our efforts to fund industry. We expect to make awards through this program approximately every six months to assist companies whose financing demands is frequently at shorter intervals than academic institutions. These awards will be made following a robust peer review process ensuring that awards are made to projects that are based on sound scientific data and have a reasonable chance of success.
CIRM: Four clinical trials that were fostered by CIRM funds are already in clinical trials for cancer and blood disorders. We expect one or more CIRM-funded projects to join that list in the next year. This includes projects that are in clinical trial already for which we have funded and are funding the follow on studies.
CIRM: Yes, we have recently held the first round of applications for our Strategic Partnership Awards that are designed specifically to attract applications from industry and include significant leveraged funding from multinational biopharmaceutical companies and/or venture capital. The first of these awards will be announced at an upcoming meeting of our governing board, the Independent Citizens Oversight Committee. Industry also accesses CIRM funding through the Disease Team awards, which include teams comprised of both academic researchers and industry as partners, consultants and advisors.
CIRM: No. We have awarded more basic research grants in numbers, but those grants are much smaller in dollars than those in our translational portfolio. That translational portfolio includes 75 projects that have been awarded nearly $600 million, well over half of the research dollars committed.
When CIRM funding was initiated in late 2006, there was a need to build intellectual and facility capacity because doubts about support from federal sources had limited the entry of scientists into the field and there was a need for “safe harbor facilities. “ Research into stem cells was also at an early stage and so it made sense for us to focus on the discovery phase of basic biology and pre-clinical work to enable more effective utilization of the potential that was evident.
Increasingly however we are moving towards clinical science, to enable a proper assessment of the value of cell therapies and related approaches for advancement of human medicine.
Our focus has always included all stem and progenitor cells. Pluripotential stem cells are immortal and develop into all cells of the body, so the potential is large and the available funding outside CIRM has been modest. We have concentrated on human rather than animal model cells because this is where the need has been greatest. Our goal is to fund transformational research with the highest potential benefit to patients, regardless of the stem cell type they utilize.
As for infrastructure, we spent $271 million in major facilities grants to help create new, state-of-the-art safe harbor research facilities in California which are essential for delivering the goals of CIRM. That investment was used to leverage almost $900 million in additional funds from private donors and institutions to help pay for those facilities. Each facility attracted new researchers to the state, employed local construction workers and created expanded research facilities that will now be able to offer long-term employment for the high tech innovators in stem cell research, transformative new medicines for intractable disease and deliver economic benefit for Californians.
CIRM: Yes, our focus in our new Strategic Plan does just that, emphasizing the increased focus on translation and clinical trials. As described above, we are investing strongly in this sector. But we firmly believe that advancement in medicine is dependent on the science that underpins the medical strategies. We will also continue to support high quality basic science that can transform medical opportunities.
CIRM: We are required by our statute to fund in those areas that are under-invested. Otherwise we are agnostic to cell type. We expect a mixture of embryonic (induced pluripotent stem cells as well when they are ready for clinical studies), fetal, adult, cancer stem and progenitor cells, as well as small molecules, biologics and other approaches, evolving from stem cell assays and research. We are most concerned with the ability to produce results for patients.
Yes, we have appointed a Vice President with business development responsibilities and are further strengthening this capacity with key staff. We are actively working with industry to develop sustainable partnerships in research, we hold webinars and face to face meetings with the FDA to better equip industry with the tools that can aid in their investigational new drug (IND) submissions . We also assist industry to better understand what they need to do to successfully apply for CIRM funding.
We have also made changes to our intellectual property regulations and loan regulations to make it even more attractive for companies to partner with us in research.
Our focus has been in moving promising research through the "Valley of Death" phase, from the lab through Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials. We are working with major industry and financial institutions to inform them of our developing portfolio with the belief that they will be interested in taking many of these products to the market place. We are probably unable to afford to do these late stage clinical trials alone and feel it is likely that commercial interests will provide the follow on funding.
CIRM: We are always interested in proposals that will enhance our mission. While this hypothetical has not been put to us we would have to assess the proposal on its merits and our available finances.
CIRM: In our RFA’s we have provided guidance as to what entities qualify for CIRM funding. Future requirments are presently under review by our General Counsel. Certainly, companies will need to show genuine steps at the time of application towards relocation of a significant component of their research activities to California in addition to establishing a California operation with California employees. CIRM funding would be largely limited to in-state activities.
- Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine: Learning from Spin-Outs - April 28th, 2013
- 2013 Annual Regenerative Medicine Industry Report - April 21st, 2013
- Cell Therapy Blog welcomes 2013 - January 6th, 2013
- The Accuracy of Adipose Stem Cell Doses - December 23rd, 2012
- A proposed 6-step platform for the cell therapy industry to consider in combating non-compliant cell therapy treatments - December 16th, 2012
- The ROI on pant-wearing and other social media tips - December 16th, 2012
- Six steps to fighting non-compliant cell therapy treatments. --- The stuff of grey shades, spades, ivory towers and (ahem) balls. - December 2nd, 2012
- Cell Therapy Industry Group Welcomes its 4,000th member - November 11th, 2012
- GEN's "Cellular Therapy Wave Finally Cresting". An overview and data set. - November 4th, 2012
- Cell therapy portfolio outperforms major indices year-to-date - October 14th, 2012
- The cost of clinical trial data bias/loss, FDA's new job and the need for bold leadership. - September 30th, 2012
- Anticipated short-term cell therapy industry clinical milestones - September 30th, 2012
- Two lessons I learned this week. - September 16th, 2012
- Are some cell counts too good to be true? Why some companies' product data may mislead. - September 2nd, 2012
- Is the cell therapy sector outperforming the major indices? - August 12th, 2012
- FDA 1. RSI 0. Regenerative Sciences (Regenexx) vs FDA (2012) - July 29th, 2012
- Bioreactor Design and Bioprocess Controls for Industrialized Cell Processing - June 17th, 2012
- Industry-sponsored cardiovascular cell therapies. Some metrics. - May 27th, 2012
- Cell-based Cancer Immunotherapies. Some metrics.. - May 20th, 2012
- Another > $100M month for companies in the cell therapy space - May 6th, 2012
- Predicting the Success of the Late-Stage Cell-Based Cancer Immunotherapy Pipeline? - March 11th, 2012
- 2011 EMA Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT) classification record. What can be learned? - January 1st, 2012
- Inactive and recently failed or terminated phase III or II/III cell therapy trials - December 18th, 2011
- Recently approved cell therapy products - December 18th, 2011
- Active phase III or II/III cell therapy trials - December 11th, 2011
- Sabrina Cohen Foundation Thanks Stem Cell Researchers - November 27th, 2011
- Commercializing Cell-based Regenerative Medicines - November 13th, 2011
- Cell Therapy & Regenerative Medicine Domains Available - September 25th, 2011
- Commercial-stage Cell Therapy Companies and Products - September 18th, 2011
- Potential far-reaching implications of the ongoing fight over point-of-care autologous cell therapy - September 18th, 2011
- Good Data? $100. Good Product Development? $100. Good Commercialization Strategy? Priceless. - August 14th, 2011
- Clinical trial costs - July 31st, 2011
- Cell Therapy's Got Talent Technology Showcase - A Call for Cell Therapy Manufacturing Technology Presentations - July 10th, 2011
- In vivo cell trafficking just took a leap forward - July 3rd, 2011
- Cell Therapies: Commercializing a New Class of Biopharmaceuticals - February 12th, 2011
- The LinkedIn Cell Therapy Industry Group - 1,000 members strong - January 15th, 2011
- Careers in cell therapy & regenerative medicine - October 11th, 2010
- FDA files injunction again Regenerative Sciences citing Regenexx violates regulations - August 12th, 2010
- The changing face of PR and why it matters to regenmed - June 12th, 2010
- Biotech tax credit appears perfectly designed for cell therapy companies to recoup research dollars spent in 2009-10 - May 22nd, 2010
- Google to Invest in Regenerative Medicine - May 5th, 2010
- Latest Cell Therapy Approval by FDA. Dendreon's Provenge. - April 30th, 2010
- Stem cells for a Webby! - April 28th, 2010