International Stem Cell Corporation: A Multitude Of Potential Products From Its Parthenogenesis Technology by Jason Chew
By Dr. Matthew Watson
Most commonly, these cell lines are created from unwanted embryos stored at IVF clinics. To distinguish the two methods, stem cell lines created through parthenogenesis are called hpSC; those created from fertilized eggs are called “embryonic” or hESC. Both have the potential to create any cell in the human body, but only hpSC lines do not involve the use or destruction of a fertilized human egg.
ISCO has formed several business units to advance its hpSC technology. The Lifeline Skin Care unit has created a stem cell based anti-aging cream. The Lifeline Cell Technologies division encompasses both the sale of growth media and human cells used in stem cell and other research. UniStemCell® was established to create a stem cell bank. And most recently, a business unit call Cytovis® was formed to further the company’s stem cell derived corneal and retinal tissue programs.
The Company launched its skin care products, consisting of a Day and a Night conditioning crème, in December through a joint marketing venture with noted Internet financial and economic advisor, John Mauldin. The initial launch involved only a limited number of targeted customers and was intended to analyze acceptance rates and refine the company’s customer service and delivery systems. The Company has stated that, although the data base needs to be expanded by an additional offering scheduled in January before meaningful statistics can be generated, early customer responses indicate that users of the crèmes are getting favorable results from the product, which confirms the Company’s own pre-market test results.
The market for skin care products is large; according to Mintel market research, total US sales in 2009 was $4.35 billion. By individual brand, the best selling anti-aging creams in 2008 range in market share from 3% for Olay Regenerist, to 1.3% for L’Oreal RevitaLift. Applied to the 2009 sales total, this translates to roughly $130 million and $57 million, respectively. These are likely upper bounds for sales of any new product.
Without the ability to run a large marketing campaign, ISCO is smart to offer its product first to its shareholders and followers. On the surface, its partnership with entrepreneur and newsletter writer John Mauldin seems a bit odd, it will be interesting to see how his marketing skills will be used to convert his 1.5 million readers into Lifeline Skin Care buyers.
ISCO sells reagents and human cells for research through its Lifeline Cell Technology unit. Stem cell research is a fast-growing field requiring specialized, high quality products. Lifeline Cell Technology has signed distribution agreements with such powerhouses as American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and Millipore for its products, as well as regional distributorships in Europe, Japan and elsewhere. These products generate revenue for the company while providing a source of quality reagents for in-house research.
Other business units under the ISCO umbrella are still in the early stages of development. The unit that may best leverage the hpSC technology may be the UniStemCell cell bank.
One of the major promises in stem cell research is in the field of regenerative medicine. Embryonic and parthenogenetic stem cells can be turned into any human cell type; in theory, these cells can then be used to treat diseases such as diabetes, degenerative brain diseases, cardiac arrest, spinal cord injury, all by aiding in the re-growth of damaged tissue.
A major problem in the use of hESC in regenerative medicine is the ability to find proper matches for the recipient. As with any transplant, strategies must be used to prevent rejection of the donor tissue. By their nature, hESC cell lines express a highly variable set of antigens involved in graft rejection. These antigens are part of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC).
The high variability causes difficulty in finding matches between hESC lines and recipients. On the other hand, hpSC technology produces cell lines with a much more uniform set of MHC molecules. Through proper selection, a single hpSC cell line can provide fairly good histocompatibility match for a large segment of the US population. Additional cell lines can provide matches for additional subgroups so that, in time, a match may be possible for almost all potential transplant candidates.
Through the cell bank, ISCO is providing material for outside groups to conduct cutting edge research and develop therapies based on hpSC technology. The potential is great, but revenue in the form of royalties is far off and uncertain.
Further along in development is the company’s stem cell derived corneal and retinal tissue therapy program. ISCO has partnered with Absorption Systems in the US, Sankara Nethralaya in India, and Automation Partnership in the UK to develop the technology, now under the Cytovis® brand- CytoCor ®for corneal tissue and CytoRet® for retinal tissue.
The Cytovis® technology is in pre-clinical testing and has many potential therapeutic applications including: age-related macular degeneration, retinitis pigmentosa, and the repair of traumatic eye injuries.
The company is also actively testing its CytoCor® tissue for use as an alternative to live animals and animal eyes in drug and consumer products testing. ISCO estimates this to be a $500 million dollar market. Recent laboratory results have shown the CytoCor® corneal tissue to have optical properties. It was also observed to have drug absorption properties similar to real cornea.
The large number of business units is unusual for a company this size. A lack of focus is always a concern, but at the same time, it speaks to the considerable potential of the company’s stem cell technology.
- Tracking the Fruits of California Stem Cell Agency Research - September 1st, 2013
- UCLA Snags $3.6 Million from California Stem Cell Agency - September 1st, 2013
- Stem Cell Agency Seeks Stronger Ties with Possible Industry Funding Partners - September 1st, 2013
- UCLA Takes Four of 13 Awards Today; One Business Wins - September 1st, 2013
- $41 Million in California Stem Cell Grants Virtually Approved - September 1st, 2013
- Stem Cell Agency Pays Tribute to the Late Duane Roth - September 1st, 2013
- Skin in California’s Stem Cell Game - September 1st, 2013
- California Stem Cell Agency's $150,000 Search for Its Financial Future - August 25th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Researchers to Receive $70 Million Next Week - August 25th, 2013
- Flim-Flam Stem Cell Artists Targeted by CIRM - August 25th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Agency Spending: Where the Money Is Going - August 25th, 2013
- A $2 Million Bill: Outside Contracting by California Stem Cell Agency - August 25th, 2013
- New Ties to Big Pharma and Venture Capital Proposed at California Stem Cell Agency - August 25th, 2013
- Bonilla: Veto of Pay-for-Eggs Bill Shows Troubling Mindset - August 18th, 2013
- 'Butter and Eggs Money" and a Gubernatorial Veto - August 18th, 2013
- California Gov. Jerry Brown Vetoes Pay-for-Eggs Legislation - August 18th, 2013
- A $6 Billion Question: Progress of the California Stem Cell Agency - August 18th, 2013
- Duane Roth: Ecumenical Innovator for San Diego and Biotech - August 18th, 2013
- Stem Cell Agency's Duane Roth Eulogized at Memorial Services - August 18th, 2013
- 'Paradigm Shift' -- Researchers as Patient Advocates? - August 18th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Agency on Lacks: Informed Consent Cannot Remove All Questions - August 11th, 2013
- Californians Top List of Stem Cell Honorees - August 11th, 2013
- The Henrietta Lacks Story and Eggs, Money and Motherhood - August 11th, 2013
- Skloots, Collins and More on Henrietta Lacks' Cell Line Deal - August 11th, 2013
- Memorial Services Friday for Duane Roth, Co-vice chairman of the California Stem Cell Agency - August 11th, 2013
- CIRM's Roth Dies Following Bike Accident - August 11th, 2013
- Pay-for-Eggs Legislation Now Before California Gov. Jerry Brown - August 4th, 2013
- Comment re Pay-for-Eggs Item and Forbes Article - August 4th, 2013
- Pay-for-Eggs Legislation: A Comment on Risk - August 4th, 2013
- Skimpy Coverage of Alpha Clinic Concept Approval - August 4th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Agency Looking for New Home in Two Years - August 4th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Official Duane Roth in Improving Condition - July 28th, 2013
- Another $23 Million to Recruit Star Stem Cell Scientists to California - July 28th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Agency Launches $70 Million Alpha Stem Cell Clinic Project - July 28th, 2013
- Coming Up: Live Coverage of Today's California Stem Cell Meeting - July 28th, 2013
- Stem Cell Lines and Paid-for Eggs: Stem Cell Agency Delays Action on Easing Restrictions - July 28th, 2013
- $70 Million Alpha Stem Cell Clinic Project Garners Mainstream Media Attention - July 28th, 2013
- UCLA Researcher Calls for Easing of Restrictions on Stem Cell Lines Derived from Eggs From Paid Providers - July 28th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Agency to Commit 20 Percent of Remaining Cash - July 21st, 2013
- Paying for Human Eggs, Ivan Illich and Jerry Brown - July 21st, 2013
- California's $70 Million 'Alpha' Stem Cell Clinic Plan Headed for Approval Next Week - July 21st, 2013
- TV News Piece on Pay-for-Eggs Airs in Los Angeles, San Francisco - July 14th, 2013
- Shestack Resignation Letter: Heartfelt and Eloquent - July 14th, 2013
- Veto Campaign Launched on California Pay-For-Eggs Bill - July 14th, 2013
- Sacramento Mental Health Advocate Appointed to Stem Cell Agency Board - July 14th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Merger: Capricor and Niles Therapeutics - July 14th, 2013
- Pay-for-Eggs Legislation: Strange Bedfellows and Existential Questions - July 14th, 2013
- "Comfort News" for California's Stem Cell Research Effort - July 14th, 2013
- HIV Clinical Trial Hailed by California Stem Cell Agency - July 14th, 2013
- Eggs and Cash: Stem Cell Agency Considering Easing Restrictions on Stem Cell Lines Derived Using Payments - July 14th, 2013
- California Legislation Removing Ban on Payments for Eggs for Research Heads to Governor - July 14th, 2013
- California Legislation, Human Egg Sales and Profits - July 7th, 2013
- Challenge to WARF hESC Patents Cites Recent U.S. Supreme Court Decision - July 7th, 2013
- Cost of a Stem Cell Therapy? An Estimated $512,000 - June 30th, 2013
- Bluebird and Banking: Media Pluses for California Stem Cell Agency - June 30th, 2013
- International team submits IND application - June 23rd, 2013
- Pay-For-Eggs Legislation Draws More Media Attention - June 23rd, 2013
- Compensation for Human Eggs Approved by Key California Senate Committee, But Not For CIRM Researchers - June 16th, 2013
- Merksamer Makes Only Bid For Stem Cell Agency Lobbying Contract - June 16th, 2013
- Cellular Dynamics: California Stem Cell Agency Recipient Plans $57 Million IPO - June 9th, 2013
- Light Coverage of Cellular Dynamics IPO But One Exec Says It's Good for Stem Cell Biz - June 9th, 2013
- Pomeroy on Doing the Right Thing and Foster Care - June 9th, 2013
- Vatican Funding for California Stem Cell Agency? - June 2nd, 2013
- Bluebird bio of Massachusetts Still Waiting for California Stem Cell Money - June 2nd, 2013
- California's Alpha Stem Cell Clinics: Open in 2014, Six to Eight Locations - June 2nd, 2013
- Monterey Newspaper Chides California Stem Cell Agency - June 2nd, 2013
- Trounson Proposes $70 Million, Fast-Track Stem Cell Clinic Plan for California - June 2nd, 2013
- $70 Million Alpha Stem Cell Clinic Proposal Draws Reader Comment - June 2nd, 2013
- Sacramento Bee: Ongoing Conflict Problems No Help for Future Funding of Stem Cell Agency - June 2nd, 2013
- Multimillion Dollar Carrots for Stem Cell Research in California - May 26th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Agency: 5 Percent Budget Increase for Coming Fiscal Year - May 26th, 2013
- $36 Million Recruitment: Names of Researchers Being Lured to California - May 26th, 2013
- Stem Cell Agency Approves $36 million to Recruit Six Scientists to California - May 26th, 2013
- California Stem Cell Agency to Court Patient Groups This Summer - May 26th, 2013
- Nature Reports on Lee Hood Conflict Case - May 26th, 2013
- Grant Reviewer Conflict in $40 Million Round at California Stem Cell Agency - May 26th, 2013
- Text of CIRM Comments on Lee Hood Questions - May 26th, 2013
- Replicating Oregon Cloning in California: Views on the Legality - May 19th, 2013
- Oregon-style Stem Cell Cloning Research Illegal in California: No Pay for Eggs in Golden State - May 19th, 2013
- Weissman Says Oregon-style Stem Cell Research Could be Done in California - May 19th, 2013