City University of Hong Kong (CityU) scientists have created a new microneedle patch to deliver cell therapies but rather than using traditional materials for their needles, they used ice.

The challenge: Cell therapies use living cells to treat medical conditions. Stem cell transplants are a form of cell therapy, as are some types of cancer immunotherapy.

These cells are typically transplanted into the patient via an implant, injection, or surgical graft. Not only can those delivery methods be painful and invasive, they also carry a risk of infection and must be administered by an experienced professional.

That limits the use of cell therapy to people who are willing to subject themselves to the transplantation process and who also have access to professionals capable of administering them.

Ice, ice baby: Microneedle patches are a growing trend in drug delivery. They're usually about the size of a postage stamp and are covered in tiny needles made of biodegradable substances packed with drugs.

Press the patch down on the skin like a band aid, and the needles break off from the back of the patch. They then dissolve into the skin, painlessly delivering the drug.

CityU created the microneedles for its patch out of ice, packed with living cells, coated in a protective medium.

Ice is easier to make and work with than the materials traditionally used for dissolving micropatches, but it melts just as readily. Even better, the icy microneedles can preserve the viability of living cells something other types of patches can't do.

The freezing cold water: Because the microneedles are made of ice, they would have to be transported and stored frozen, which could be a limiting factor in some places.

Additionally, the icy microneedle patch performed well when used to deliver a cell therapy to mice as a proof of concept, but it still needs to be proven safe and effective in humans.

What's next: If CityU's microneedle patch is cleared for use in people, it could have applications even beyond cell therapy.

"This device can also package, store, and deliver DNA, vaccines, and more."

"This device can also package, store, and deliver other types of bioactive therapeutic agents, such as proteins, peptides, mRNA, DNA, and vaccines," lead researcher Xu Chenjie said in a press release.

"I hope this device offers an easy-to-use and effective alternative method for the delivery of therapeutics in clinics."

We'd love to hear from you! If you have a comment about this article or if you have a tip for a future Freethink story, please email us at [emailprotected].

Visit link:
Icy Microneedle Patch Delivers Cell Therapy, Then Melts - Freethink

Skin Stem Cells Comments Off on Icy Microneedle Patch Delivers Cell Therapy, Then Melts – Freethink | May 15th, 2021

During a virtual Targeted Oncology Case-Based event, Pashna N. Munshi, MD, associate clinical director, Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy Program, assistant professor of Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, discussed the case of a 48-year-old male patient with acute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD).

Targeted OncologyTM: What factors contribute to the risk of acute GVHD in a patient like this one?

MUNSHI: A lot of donor-recipient factors and other conditions increase the risk of acute GVHD. [These include] gender matching, human leukocyte antigen disparity, degree of mismatch, and having an older donor. Theres also [blood group] incompatibility and definitely CMV mismatched status. Though now that the FDA has approved letermovir [Prevymis] for patients who are undergoing allogeneic transplant if they have a CMV-positive donor,1 were seeing very little CMV reactivation. That has been a bit of a game changer for the good.

Patients have an increased risk of GVHD if they receive a transplant from a peripheral blood stem cell source versus a bone marrow graft, because the peripheral blood has more T cells in its composition. The myeloablative regimens [are associated with greater risk of GVHD than] reduced-intensity regimens.2

Do you agree with these poll results? Would you start with systemic therapy for this patient?

It can get a little tricky whether you want to give patients systemic steroids or wait and see if something gentler might work. I tend to agree that, at this point, the patient needs to immediately start with systemic steroids, because there are 2 organ systems involved. Once the lower gastrointestinal [GI] tract gets involved, it surely portends a poor prognosis if the grade becomes worse. And they become refractory to steroids very quickly: 50% of these patients will eventually not respond to steroids.

How would you stage this patients GVHD?

There are many criteria for staging GVHD. The criteria that most clinical trials use are the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium [MAGIC] criteria.3 They are adapted from the Glucksberg criteria, which are very similar.4

Three organ systems [are involved in] acute GVHD: the skin, the liver, and the GI tract. Skin involvement is graded on the basis of the body surface area involved. Liver involvement is graded on the basis of the total bilirubin level. Upper GI involvement is graded on the basis of anorexia, nausea, and vomiting, and it just comes in stage 0 or stage I, depending on if its persistent or not. To determine lower GI tract involvement, we measure stool volume, especially when patients are admitted to the hospital. But once they go home, we cant do that, so we ask them how many times a day they have diarrhea. Is it watery? Is it muddy? Whats the volume? Is it large or small?

The patient can characterize the stool and tell their doctor how many times per day: 4 times, 5 times, 6 times. This patient is having 4 episodes per day; that puts them in stage I lower GI GVHD. But with a 60% body rash, that puts them in stage III skin GVHD. So really getting up there with skin, but not so much yet for GI. Once each organ [involvement is] staged, theres an aggregate score based on the combination of these organs. Then we come up with the grade.

In this patient, with a stage III rash, stage I upper GI, and stage I lower GI GVHD, they have a total score of a grade 2 acute GVHD. This is still in the mild to moderate zone. Anything above grade 2 is considered very severe GVHD.

Would you recommend that this patient receive systemic steroids?

In the scheme of things, somebody who didnt have symptoms and now is having active symptoms, especially with lower GI tract involvement, definitely needs high-dose steroids to get in there and [stop] the inflammation.

On what would you base a prognosis for this patient?

We can risk stratify these patients on the basis of the stage of organ involvement.5 Broadly, they can be at a standard risk or at a high risk [of poor response to treatment, mortality, and transplant-related mortality]. The patient is at high risk once they have very active GI involvement [or] if they have 2 organs involved. This is one more reason to think about starting these patients early on steroids. Why is this important? Because once a patient has high-risk GVHD, the chance of response to steroids is even lower, and once they dont respond to steroids, there is a higher [risk of] transplant-related mortality. The probability of transplant-related mortality is 44% for patients with high-risk acute GVHD flares, [versus] 22% for patients with low-risk GVHD [P < .001]. These are a few things to think about. Act very swiftly if a patient has 2-organ involvement, especially the lower GI tract.

Can biomarkers guide treatment decisions in this case?

In the field of GVHD, biomarkers are a very exciting advancement. We want a prognostic model of which patients will get GVHD. Can biomarkers in the blood [help] prevent GVHD and improve transplant outcomes?

A large prospective trial was done through the Bone and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network where a set of 6 biomarkers were tested at several time points after the transplant.6 They saw that they could predict when GVHD happened by using these biomarkers. They could see that as the levels of these biomarkers increased, the patients had higher scores of GVHD. Once treatment was started, if specific biomarkers went down it was predictive of response at day 28 [56% vs 17%; odds ratio, 6.32; P = .001] and also predictive of [decreased] transplant-related mortality by day [180 (49% vs 87%; P < .0001)]. If all these biomarkers went up aggressively, overall survival was lower [P < .0001].

The MAGIC Consortium also tried to test biomarkers.7 They looked at 2 biomarkers, REG3Athe regenerating islet-derived 3-alpha, which is specific for the GI tract and ST2. Looking at these 2 biomarkers, they came up with an algorithm of prediction. On the basis of how these biomarkers responded at the time of GVHD and to treatment, they could predict mortality by 6 months. In clinical practice, it is difficult to use this day in and day out. We still use our clinical skills to assess the degree of GVHD. But all patients eventually get treated the same waywith high-dose steroidsdespite biomarkers being elevated or not.

At this point, [biomarker data] may tell us an association rather than a causality. Were not openly using biomarkers to guide our practice, but I think were learning to use them a bit more and knowing that theres something out there that could be used as a predictive tool. It is an exciting development.

Are there alternatives to systemic steroids?

Steroids remain the mainstay. We need to see if we can move to other therapies that are coming down the pipeline.

Data from the REACH1 [NCT02953678] and REACH2 [NCT02913261] trials led to ruxolitinib [Jakafi] approval.8,9 If we can use ruxolitinib in an up-front setting, [maybe we] can use the newly approved rho-kinase or ROCK2 inhibitors as well.10 We want to think about steroid-sparing agents. Maybe biomarkers can guide us in the future for that. But right now, in terms of, Do I start my patient on treatment? or Will they respond to this treatment, I find that [biomarkers are] still not a very useful tool because at the end of the day, the patients all still need to be started on steroids.

The minute you see that your patient is not responding to steroids, very quickly start them on a JAK2 inhibitor.

How do you dose steroids?

This patient received 2 mg/kg of prednisone per day for 14 days. Two mg/kg is a very high dose. The standard is 1 to 2 mg/kg.11 There are data to show that 2 mg isnt any different from 1 mg.12 But a lot of times, if its a very active, severe flare, we will use 2 mg/kg. Im not sure if I would have done 2 mg/kg in this case, but its certainly not out of the realm of treating these patients.

The goals of primary therapy for acute GVHD are to stabilize the organ manifestations, or improve them, and limit long-term treatment toxicity. We want to improve functional capacity and prevent any reduction in quality of life. First-line therapy is always with corticosteroids. Now ruxolitinib is approved for second-line therapy.8 There have been data to show that it can improve overall survival.

How do you taper glucocorticosteroids after achieving initial response?

If the patient is taking 2 mg/kg of steroids, an average 70-kg person, thats over 100 mg of steroids. After 2 weeks, they probably are not getting up from a seated position anymore with all the muscle wasting that can happen.

[As soon as they start to show improvement, it would be safe to start to taper the dose.] Traditionally, [the patient receives the full dose for] at least a week or 10 days. Then it is traditional to decrease the dose 10% every 5 to 7 days, gently coming down, making sure that the patient is not having any flares.

Describe the multidisciplinary teambased approach that you use for acute GVHD.

The incidence of acute GVHD in the patient population is anywhere from 30% to 50%, despite the best [efforts at] prophylaxis. Most patients will get some form of acute GVHDit can go up to even 80%. This [necessitates] a multidisciplinary team approach. If the patient is having diarrhea, theyre having malnourishment. Theres nausea or anorexia, so theyre not eating on top of that. Then theres skin rash, so the risk of infections and cellulitis. Theyre in pain. A dermatologist probably should be involved at some point. A nutrition team is also needed. If theyre on high-dose steroids, physical therapy should be involved up front. So early involvement of a whole team is very important. Thats usually how I treat my patients and usually how centers of excellence continue to treat active patients with GVHD after transplantation.

How do you determine if a patients GVHD is steroid refractory?

The strict definition of steroid refractoriness or resistance is if theres progression of acute GVHD within 3 to 5 days of starting high-dose steroids, or theres failure to improve within 1 week of starting these steroids, or theres incomplete response after more than 28 days of any immunosuppressive treatment.13 So, by and large, in 3 days or a maximum of 7 days, [it will be clear] if the patients GVHD is going to be steroid refractory or not.

Steroid dependence is [defined as when] the patients GVHD initially responded to steroids, but the disease flares when the dose is tapered, so they cannot be taken off the steroids.

Steroid intolerance is when the patient develops [unacceptable toxicity from steroids such as] uncontrolled diabetes or myopathies. Then it becomes hard to keep them on steroids.

What are the treatment options for patients with steroid-refractory GVHD?

Ruxolitinib now has been FDA approved for steroid-refractory acute GVHD, and its a category 1 definition.8,11 Ibrutinib [Imbruvica] has also been approvedits only FDA-approved indication is for chronic GVHD.14 There are many other treatment options [in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines].11 Oncologists always end up using some combination or other depending on which of these different immune suppression medications they are comfortable using.

What new treatments are in the pipeline?

In terms of BTK inhibitors, I dont think theres anything other than ibrutinib at this time point. There are many JAK inhibitors being studied.15 Baricitinib is another JAK inhibitor thats actively being studied for chronic GVHD, as well as for pulmonary GVHD.16 Then there are other rho-kinase inhibitors, called ROCK2 inhibitors. This is really making waves. Were very excited about this drug because the response rates are very high, about 70%.10 Its a smaller study, but clearly it has antifibrotic pathways. So I think thats going to be used much more in the up-front setting.

Then theres also alpha-1 antitrypsin, which targets the liver and macrophages and has very promising results from trials done at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Michigan.17 So I think were going to see very different characteristics of how to approach GVHD.

What data support the use of ruxolitinib in this setting?

The REACH1 study led to the approval of ruxolitinib for steroid-refractory acute GVHD.9,18 In this phase 2 trial, patients with steroid-refractory acute GVHD got ruxolitinib (5 mg twice a day) with or without a calcineurin inhibitor. They were allowed to remain on steroids. The primary end point of this trial was overall response rate [ORR] at day 28. They also looked at response rates at day 56 and day 100, biomarkers, failure-free survival, and durability of these responses. The ORR at day 28 was very high: 54.9%.18 The best ORR, which was at any given time during the treatment, which was as high as 73.2%. The median time to response was 7 days. So this was very quick. The median duration of response was 345 days, with more than 6 months follow-up. Nonrelapse mortality at 6 months was 44.4%. There were deaths from infections, etc, but not related directly to ruxolitinib.

Subsequently there was a phase 3 trial, REACH2.19 They looked at higher doses of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute GVHD. They started off with 10 mg [of ruxolitinib] twice a day. This study had a similar primary end point of ORR at day 28. This was compared with best available therapy. This was done in Europe, so [the comparison was to the] best available therapy used in Europe, like anti-thymocyte globulin, sirolimus [Rapamune], etanercept [Enbrel], photopheresis, or other therapies; all things that we would use in the United States as well. They looked at similar key secondary end points, [including] duration of response at day 56.

The ORR for ruxolitinib was 62% at day 28, compared with the best available therapy arm, which was 39% [odds ratio, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.65 to 4.22; P < .001].19 Durable overall response at day 56 [was higher in the ruxolitinib group than it was in the control group (40% vs 22%, odds ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.43-3.94; P < .001)].19

The lower grade acute GVHD, which was grade 2, had the highest complete response rate with ruxolitinib: 50.9% compared with just 26.4% with best available therapy.19 This is quite remarkable to have a complete response in GVHD so quickly. When you get to higher grades of GVHD, the complete response rate for ruxolitinib is not as impressive; its less than 30%. But its still much higher than the [response rates of] other therapies we would have otherwise treated these patients with in steroid-refractory disease. The key point is to diagnose steroid refractoriness early. Then get ruxolitinib in there to break the cycle and break the progression of organ grade to something higher.

The loss of response wasnt statistically significant. The estimated cumulative incidents for the loss of response at 6 months was 10% in ruxolitinib compared with 39% in the control arm.19 So patients continued to maintain responses, which, again, is what we want to see. We dont want to see flares if they come off steroids.

[Of the 4 organ systems involved in GVHD], the skin responses were the best with ruxolitinib. Lower GI and liver GVHD did have good responses, but the responses were not as remarkable. Ruxolitinib is an ideal drug in this setting, on the basis of the organ responses.

A secondary end point was failure-free survival, basically indicating a time point from randomization to either nonrelapse-related death or any new GVHD. This was not statistically significant because it was not designed to compare ruxolitinib survival outcomes with control therapy. But there were 5.0 months median failure-free survival with ruxolitinib compared with 1.0 month with control [hazard ratio for relapse or progression of hematologic disease, nonrelapse-related death, or addition of new systemic therapy for acute GVHD, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35-0.60]. That tells you that the responses were maintained, and the treatment was still working.

[Most of the adverse events associated with ruxolitinib] were expected; the bone marrow is recovering so its a bit fragile. [The most common was] thrombocytopenia. You can reduce the dose of ruxolitinib down to 5 mg adjusted accordingly or support patients with transfusions. CMV reactivation was also common. But again, with letermovir, that happens less and less.

References:1. Merck receives FDA approval of Prevymis (letermovir) for prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in adult allogeneic stem cell transplant patients. News release. Merck. November 9, 2017. Accessed April 7, 2021. https://bit.ly/3fS6S0Q

2. Scott BL. Long-term follow up of BMT CTN 0901, a randomized phase 3 trial comparing myeloablative (MAC) to reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplasia (MDS) (MAvRIC Trial). Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020;26(3):S11. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.12.07

3. Harris AC, Young R, Devine S, et al. International, multicenter standardization of acute graft-versus-host disease clinical data collection: a report from the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22(1):4-10. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.09.001

4. Martino R, Romero P, Subira M, et al. Comparison of the classic Glucksberg criteria and the IBMTR Severity Index for grading acute graft-versus-host disease following HLA-identical sibling stem cell transplantation. International Bone Marrow

See more here:
Munshi Explains Staging, Prognosis, and Treatment for a Patient With Acute Graft-vs-Host-Disease - Targeted Oncology

Skin Stem Cells Comments Off on Munshi Explains Staging, Prognosis, and Treatment for a Patient With Acute Graft-vs-Host-Disease – Targeted Oncology | May 15th, 2021

South Korea and Japan have given the beauty world many gifts cleansing balms, glass-skin serums, inventive masks for making skin gleam. And at this time of unprecedented violence against Asians in this country, the Allure family is more passionate than ever about championing Asian innovation and Asian voices. We will speak out against racism and intolerance and do more than ever to support Asian-owned beauty brands, starting with this special edition of the Allure Beauty Box. Inside are some of the most influential K-beauty and J-beauty products of all time ones that have revolutionized our editors routines and the entire beauty industry. Sulwhasoo First Care Activating Serum is an innovative prep step for glowing skin (one bottle is sold every 10 seconds worldwide) and AHC Essential Real Eye Cream for Face, a unique eye and face cream hybrid, is cherished in South Korea (where one is sold every three seconds.) We hope they become as beloved by you as they are by us! And if you would like to get involved in the movement to Stop Asian Hate, you can also join Allure editors in donating to the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund and to GoFundMe's AAPI Community Fund to Stop Asian Hate at gofundme.com/aapi.

- The editors of Allure

You can find all these products and more in this limited-edition box. For just $60 (or $40 exclusively for Allure Beauty Box members), you'll get ten of our favorite J-Beauty and K-Beauty products, worth over $200 in value. Quantities are limited, so order now to take advantage of this exclusive offer before they're sold out.

Check out what's in this limited-edition box.

Read this article:
The Limited-Edition J-Beauty + K-Beauty Allure Beauty Box - Allure

Skin Stem Cells Comments Off on The Limited-Edition J-Beauty + K-Beauty Allure Beauty Box – Allure | May 15th, 2021

Animal cloning has come a long way from Dolly the sheep, but all through that time the ethical and scientific repercussions only continue to pile up.

One thing is getting clearer though: The cloning process has improved by leaps and bounds (though not yet on the levels shown in science-fiction). This has resulted in headways in a number of cloning-related endeavors, from the revival of endangered (and even extinct) species to replicating dead pets.

Still, both critics and proponents are still a bit out of touch with regards to how current cloning tech is being used to address these issues.

There is some truth to the hype that bringing back the woolly mammoth via cloning could be in the not-so-distant future.

On the other hand, many critics question the wisdom of bringing back prehistoric animals to habitats that have long changed from their disappearance. Still, this ignores the possibility of restoring more recently extinct species and how cloning could counteract such drastic environmental changes from their loss.

Another popular argument against cloning is the idea that its novelty and high costs could be redirected to more natural methods of conservation. But while that may be true for a majority of endangered species, it may not be so for those that have been officially declared extinct in the wild.

Cloning could be an important tool in ensuring the genetic diversity that allows populations in captivity to grow (and make reintroduction more feasible).

The idea of cloning animals that retain a set of desirable traits has raised considerable alarm (especially among more conservative groups). However, there are benefits to the practice that cannot be ignored.

Replicating the sharp noses of bomb sniffer (or even disease sniffer) dogs could make a difference in times of need. Likewise, cloning cattle with more consistent yields of milk and meat could have applications for more efficient livestock farming.

Also read: Trained Bees Can Identify COVID-19 Infection Through Sense of Smell Within Seconds!

Now, despite the advances, today's cloning technology is still decades away from producing perfect, one-for-one genetic copies of an original animal. Differences (even large ones) can still be found. There is also the fact that environment, behavior and upbringing could still drastically alter the genetic makeup of a cloned animal (as the study of epigenetics will gradually reveal).

Throwing a bit of caution to the wind will also be important if the increase of cloned designer animals could lead to other adverse effects on the global environment (especially in the feeding of quality livestock). The same applies to the use of clones to restore and reintroduce critically endangered species.

Overall, the bounds of the technology's research has expanded considerably (and so has the conversation). But at the same time, it is important to have a strong sense of moderation regarding its application. It has the potential of causing problems and incurring needless costs, but these should not discourage future research on cloning's potential.

Also read: Snakes Can Store Sperm for up to 5 Years Before Getting Pregnant

2021 NatureWorldNews.com All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Read this article:
Rise of Animal Cloning in 2021: Benefits, Risks, and Why It Matters - Nature World News

Spinal Cord Stem Cells Comments Off on Rise of Animal Cloning in 2021: Benefits, Risks, and Why It Matters – Nature World News | May 15th, 2021

Factor reveals advances in mRNA, circleRNA, gene editing, cell reprogramming, and iPS cell-derived NK-cell technologies.

Digital presentations will be made available on the ASGCT website on May 11, 2021. For more information on the upcoming American Society of Genetic & Cell Therapy (ASGCT) Annual Meeting, visit https://annualmeeting.asgct.org/

About Factor BioscienceFounded in 2011, Factor Bioscience develops technologies for engineering cells to advance the study and treatment of disease. Factor collaborates with academic and industrial partners to develop therapeutic products based on its mRNA, gene editing, cell reprogramming, and nucleic-acid delivery technologies. Factor Bioscience is privately held and is headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. For more information, visit http://www.factorbio.com.

Media Contact:

Allen Mireles[emailprotected]

Related Linkshttp://www.factorbio.comhttps://annualmeeting.asgct.org/

SOURCE Factor Bioscience Inc.

http://www.factorbio.com

Follow this link:
Factor Bioscience to Deliver Six Digital Presentations at the American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy (ASGCT) 24th Annual Meeting - PRNewswire

IPS Cell Therapy Comments Off on Factor Bioscience to Deliver Six Digital Presentations at the American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy (ASGCT) 24th Annual Meeting – PRNewswire | May 15th, 2021

CARLSBAD, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Accelerated Biosciences, a regenerative medicine innovator, announced today new data that further demonstrates statistically significant cytolysis with induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived natural killer (NK) cells programmed from its ethically sourced human trophoblast stem cells (hTSCs). Pluristyx, a Seattle-based firm supporting drug development, regenerative medicine, and cell and gene therapies, further confirmed Accelerated Biosciences hTSC line offers before-unrealized opportunities in cell-specific therapeutics. Along with this recent data on successful iPSC differentiation, Accelerated Biosciences has already demonstrated efficient differentiation of its pluripotent stem cells with remarkable doubling times and growth characteristics to programmed NK, cartilage, bone, fat, neuron, pancreas, liver, and secretome cells.

This new data validates our findings, explains Yuta Lee, President and Founder of Accelerated Biosciences. We know the properties of our trophoblast stem cells have been long-sought by the medical science community because of the potential to speed and amplify the development of life-saving therapeutics; theyre immune privileged, chromosomally stable (not tumorigenic), pathogen free, pluripotent, easy to scale and manufacturer, and of special interest, they are ethically sourced from the chorionic villi (pre-placental tissue) of non-viable and often life-threatening tubal ectopic pregnancies. Mr. Lees father, Professor Jau-Nan Lee, MB, MD, PhD, an obstetrics and gynecologic physician and researcher in Taiwan, first isolated hTSC in 2003. Mr. Lee created Accelerated Biosciences to elevate the visibility of this pluripotent human trophoblast stem cell platform to those engaged in developing allogeneic cell therapeutics and has been instrumental in the filing and prosecution of intellectual property to protect the companys hTSC platform to date holding 34 patents.

Benjamin Fryer, PhD, Co-founder and CEO of Pluristyx, worked closely with Accelerated Biosciences to prepare much of its key hTSC data. Dr. Fryer, a trophoblast expert who was previously a research scientist at Janssen Research & Development of Johnson & Johnson, now serves on Accelerated Biosciences Scientific Advisory Board. Initially I was skeptical these cells were what they said they were. If we hadnt grown and characterized them in our lab, I might have remained skeptical. These are indeed trophoblast stem cells, explained Dr. Fryer. The potential of these cells is enormous. One of the industrys largest challenges is that its almost impossible to scale primary cells. These cells are scalable. With these cells you can make the amount required for millions of patients and theyre sourced compliant to regulatory requirements. Weve made IPS cells (induced pluripotent stem cells) and NK (natural killer) cells from them, which is the next wave of cells for cell therapies. For therapeutic developers, because these cells are not sourced from a person or viable embryo, these cells deliver the trifecta of legal, ethical, and IP advantages.

As the biotechnology industry works toward developing therapies that target only diseased cells without harming healthy cells and tissues, cell-based therapies draw increasing interest, explains industry expert, Martina Molsbergen, CEO of C14 Consulting, who has partnered with Accelerated Biosciences in a business development role. With all the promise that cell therapies hold, the biotechnology industry also remains concerned that the therapeutics are derived in a socially and ethically responsible manner. Accelerated Biosciences has discovered and is now offering what scientists see as the holy grail of stem cell sources.

Prominent biosciences experts have been drawn to Accelerated Biosciences cell breakthrough. Protein chemist and molecular biologist Igor Fisch, PhD, former President and CEO of Selexis, Geneva, Switzerland, recognizes the impact that Accelerated Biosciences hTSCs will have on human health: Not only are these cells politically correct, but they can also differentiate. Because they are sourced from pre-placenta material, theyre immune privileged, which means that are not seen as foreign by the human body. With these cells, we can create a cell bank a single source for a wide range of patients.

Peter Hudson, FTSE, BSc Hons, PhD, Chief Scientist and a senior advisor to Avipep P/L in Melbourne, Australia, and an adjunct professor at the University of Queensland, led a large oncology consortium to complete the first Phase 1 clinical trial of a novel engineered antibody targeting prostate and ovarian cancer. Hudsons interest in Accelerated Biosciences hTSCs has evolved into a role on its Scientific Advisory Board. Trophoblast stem cells are likely to be the next wave of cancer-targeting therapeutics, explains Dr. Hudson. The ability to ethically source trophoblast stem cells and program them to target only diseased, cancerous cells is very powerful technology.

Why are scientists so interested in stem cell-based therapies?

The human body constantly produces specialized cells from its own stem cells (undifferentiated cells) to renew and repair itself. Current therapies harness this power in autologous cell therapies in which the patients own cells are removed, differentiated into disease-fighting cells, and reinserted.

What makes the human trophoblast stem cell so important to medical science?

The human trophoblast stem cell (hTSC) comes from placental tissue and has special properties that make it extremely desirable to therapeutic developers. The hTSC is such an early stem cell that it has much more capacity for growth than a stem cell taken from an adult, for example. This means that one cell can become millions. The hTSC also carries with it the same immune-privilege that a growing embryo has inside its mother: its not seen as foreign although its genetically different than its mother. Unlike other foreign materials, the hTSC is not rejected by the human body, which means that it can be used with many different patients (allogeneic cell therapy). With these benefits, the scientific community holds a high regard for hTSCs, but it also faces socio-ethical concerns about how those stem cells are typically sourced.

Accelerated Biosciences sidesteps hTSC sourcing concerns in a profoundly elegant way. Dr. Jau-Nan Lee, an OB-GYN in Taiwan, found inspiration in what was considered medical waste. When surgical intervention was necessary to remove an ectopic pregnancy that would otherwise risk the womans life, the non-viable embryo and pre-placental tissue lodged in the fallopian tube was removed, sent to pathology, and discarded. Gaining permission from institutional colleagues and sampling the pre-placental tissue, Dr. Lee isolated hTSC that offered all the benefits of hTSC pluripotency, immune privilege, and scalability without pathogens and without ethical compromises.

About Accelerated Biosciences

Founded in 2013, Accelerated Biosciences is a private company focused on regenerative medicine and built around the hTSC discoveries of obstetrics and gynecology physician and researcher, Professor Jau-Nan Lee, MB, MD, PhD. Accelerated Biosciences holds a large and robust patent portfolio and an encumbrance-free intellectual property (IP) estate. Accelerated Biosciences mission is to leverage its renewable, immune-privileged human cell source to fuel breakthrough cell therapies that effectively target the most challenging diseases of the human body. For more information about Accelerated Biosciences, visit acceleratedbio.com or email mmolsbergen@c14consultinggroup.com.

Read more here:
Accelerated Biosciences' Immune-Privileged Human Trophoblast Stem Cells (hTSCs) Offer Breakthrough Opportunities in Cancer-Targeting Therapeutics and...

IPS Cell Therapy Comments Off on Accelerated Biosciences’ Immune-Privileged Human Trophoblast Stem Cells (hTSCs) Offer Breakthrough Opportunities in Cancer-Targeting Therapeutics and… | May 15th, 2021

Small dreams have no power to move hearts, and in a new six-year strategic plan, St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital is thinking very big.

What would it take to drastically increase cure rates for childhood cancer worldwide?

St. Judes answer: $11.5 billion and an additional 1,400 jobs.

To get a rough sense of scale, work it out with a pencil:

Spread over six yearsat $1.916 billion each yearits just under a third of the NCIs annual spend, fourfold this years projected revenues of the American Cancer Society, and more than seventyfold the budget of the World Health Organizations International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Its a broad and ambitious plan that will allow the institution to grow at an almost 8% compound annual growth rate, James Downing, president and CEO of St. Jude, said to The Cancer Letter.

At a global level, we also want to see identifiable increases in cure rates. We are watching those very carefully. Our goal is to move toward cure rates of 60% for diseases like acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Hodgkins lymphoma and Wilms tumor, Downing said. As we look at a global population, survival rates hover around 20%, and wed like to see those go up year by year.

A lot of our efforts are based on implementation science, looking at what works and what doesnt work. Workforce, drug distribution and true advancements in cure rates are what were seeking over the next six years.

The plan, rolled out on April 27, calls for an acceleration of research and treatment globallynot just for pediatric cancer, but also other illnesses, including blood disorders, neurological diseases, and infectious diseases.

Not surprisingly, this amount represents the largest investment the Memphis, Tenn. hospital has made in its nearly 60-year history. The previous strategic plan, the largest expansion in the institutions history, resulted in $7 billion in investments (The Cancer Letter, May 19, 2017).

The multi-phase expansion plan is funded almost entirely by steadily increasing donor contributions generated by ALSAC, the fundraising and awareness organization for St. Jude.

It is an ambitious plan. But were going to have lots of new personnel, new investments, new technology and new partnerships. We have formal partnerships with many U.N. associate agencies and organizations around the world.

Within the past six years, St. Jude has advanced fundamental, clinical, and translational research, Downing said.

Two years ago, we began strategically looking at the most pressing issues in the field of pediatric cancer, Downing said. As we developed the strategic plan over those two years, there were many ideas we critically assessed, and we often said, Its not really best for St. Jude to pursue that.

In the end, we aligned on goals that collectively bring the prospect of remarkable benefits to the field of childhood cancer, and to children with cancer everywhere.

On campus, St. Jude accepted nearly 20% more new cancer patients; increased faculty by 30% and staff by 23%; and embarked on several large-scale construction projects.

The new strategic plan focuses on five areas: fundamental science, childhood cancer, pediatric catastrophic diseases, global impact, and workforce and workplace culture.

Were coming out of a six-year strategic plan in which we increased our number of cancer patients by 20%, with 30% new faculty, 23% more staff, many large-scale construction projects, said Charles Roberts, executive vice president of St. Jude and director of the hospitals Comprehensive Cancer Center. And were now going into a new strategic plan that is 60% larger than our prior plan.

Under the plan, St. Jude will hire nearly 70 new faculty members, plus supporting laboratory staff, to work in basic, translational, and clinical research across 22 departments.

These investigators will have the freedom to pursue the type of conceptually driven research that leads to tomorrows clinical advances.

As we launch a strategic plan, weve identified the most exciting opportunities and challenges at that point in time, Roberts said to The Cancer Letter. However, we fully realize that we dont know whats coming next. New discoveries will be made, and new opportunities will emerge. Via the blue-sky process, weve set aside substantial funds every year to invest in the pursuit of emerging opportunities suggested by faculty and staff.

Part of what brought me here from Boston was the last strategic plan, and its so exciting to be a part of this. But just looking at the numbers, 1,400 new positions, average salary of $90,000. Six hundred and forty of those positions are in research, 266 are in clinical, 100 are in global pediatric medicine, and 394 in support.

Those are the kinds of numbers that you need to make these things real, and I think its exciting for St. Jude and for the field of cancer research, as we bring in all of these new folks.

During the next six years, St. Jude will invest more than $250 million to expand technology and resources available to scientists and clinicians in their search to understand why pediatric catastrophic diseases arise, spread and resist treatments. These investments will include:

St. Jude will invest $3.7 billion during the next six years to expand cancer-focused research and related clinical care. These efforts will center on raising survival rates for the highest-risk cancers and for children with relapsed diseases, while simultaneously improving quality of life for pediatric cancer survivors. The investments will include:

In the U.S., more than 80% of children diagnosed with cancer will be cured. In contrast, 80% of children with cancer live in limited-resource countries, where a mere 20% survive their disease. To address this, St. Jude will more than triple its investment in its international efforts coordinated through St. Jude Global and the St. Jude Global Alliance during the next six years.

This represents an investment of more than $470 million. Global initiatives include:

Under the plan, St. Jude will expand research and treatment programs to advance cures for childhood catastrophic diseases. The $1.1 billion, six-year investment includes work in nonmalignant hematological diseases, such as sickle cell disease; a new laboratory-based research program in infectious diseases that affect children worldwide; and a new research and clinical program to better understand and treat pediatric neurological diseases.

The plan outlines several strategies to encourage teamwork, and internal and external collaboration. These will include:

It is estimated that 87% of funds to sustain and grow St. Jude over the next six years will come from public donations.

Patients at St. Jude do not receive a bill for treatment, travel, housing or fooda model established by ALSAC and St. Jude founder Danny Thomas, who believed in equal access to medical care and driving research advances.

There are an incredible number of donors across the United States who support St. Jude, Downing said. This carries a great responsibility for us to seek the maximum possible impact to improve outcomes for childhood cancer.

Downing and Roberts spoke with Matthew Ong, associate editor of The Cancer Letter.

Matthew Ong: Congratulations on the official launch of St. Judes second six-year strategic plan. Could you briefly walk us through whats in it?

James Downing: It is an exciting time for St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital. Were finishing our prior six-year strategic plan, which started in Fiscal Year 2016. That $7 billion investment in the organization spanned fundamental science, clinical and translational research, clinical operations, and our global efforts. During the course of the plan, we increased faculty by 30% and staff by 23% and accelerated progress against pediatric catastrophic diseases.

About two years ago, we started discussing the next strategic plan. We looked critically at what we had accomplished under the previous plan, the expertise we had assembled, and the major problems in the field of pediatric catastrophic diseases, including cancer, infectious diseases, nonmalignant hematologic diseases and pediatric neurologic diseases. During that period, we involved more than 200 individuals across the institution to develop the new strategic plan.

This plan, at its core, focuses on accelerating progress against pediatric catastrophic diseases on a global scale. It outlines a $11.5 billion investment during the next six years, which includes the addition of 1,400 jobs and $1.9 billion in new capital investments, construction and renovations. Its a broad and ambitious plan that will allow the institution to grow at an almost 8% compound annual growth rate.

The plan has 11 goals, divided among five major areas: fundamental science, pediatric cancer, other childhood catastrophic diseases, global impact, and a focus on people and place. In each of these areas, were recruiting new individuals, investing in new technology, and expanding collaborations across campus, across the United States, and globally.

Ill start with fundamental science. In our last strategic plan, we invested heavily in increasing basic science programs on campus by expanding faculty numbers, technology and institutional data infrastructurein the belief that expanding fundamental science leads to new knowledge that helps advance cures. This is investigator-initiated science, often not related to diseases, but rather to the fundamental questions of biology.

In this new plan, were again investing heavily in expanding fundamental science at St. Jude. Weve committed more than $1 billion to fundamental science. This includes increasing laboratory-based faculty by more than 33% during the next six years, and more than $250 million dedicated to investments in technology.

Our goal is to make sure every dollar is spent wisely and effectively in pursuit of our missionto advance cures and means of prevention for pediatric catastrophic diseases through research and treatment.

The $250 million will fund multiple shared resources, department-based technology centers and new centers of excellence. Some of the faculty are being recruited to the centers of excellence, including those in data-driven discovery, innate immunity and inflammation, leukemia and advanced microscopy. These individuals will also have homes in academic departments.

On the technology front, were investing in shared resources. Well bring online some new ones, as well as some (Center for Modeling Pediatric Diseases and the Center for High-Content Screening) created at the end of the last strategic plan. The newest is focused on spatial transcriptomics. It will allow scientists across campus to look at the expression of genes in tissue context and at the single-cell level.

A new effort in structural biology is to create a $20 million Cryo-Electron Tomography Center. This is the next level of cryo-electron microscopy, which allows the identification of the structure of molecules or molecular machines within the context of cells. Its a developing technology that will feed other investments weve made in structural biology, such as the installation of one of the largest magnets in the world in our NMR facility, our Cryo-Electron Microscopy Center and single-cell analysis capabilities. The plan brings those tools to bear on defining normal biology and disease states.

Another effort is a Center of Excellence in Advanced Microscopy. Over the last six years, weve become one of the leading centers in the application of advanced microscopy to fundamental biology. This has been led by investigators in our Developmental Neurobiology, Cell and Molecular Biology, and Immunology departments.

Were positioned to build the next generation of microscopes to explore biology in ways never dreamed. With new faculty recruitments and collaborations with commercial companies and other institutions, we seek to develop the next generation of microscopes, and apply that to normal biology and to pediatric catastrophic diseases.

Another area were investing in heavily is data science. Over the last six years, and even before that, we expanded data sciences across campus. This initially started with the Pediatric Cancer Genome Project in 2010. Since then, we recruited many data scientists, and coalesced them into our Computational Biology, Biostatistics, and Epidemiology and Cancer Control departments, and into shared resources that provide bioinformatics support.

But over the last several years, weve seen the explosion of data, from structural biology to microscopy.

As we look to the future and the capabilities weve amassed, were poised to significantly increase our investment in data science and become a leading institution in the application of data science to biologic discovery. This is a $40 million investment with 30 full-time employees.

We have a task force led by faculty members to develop the roadmap for how were going to move forward. As data is accumulated and we look across those disparate data types, we can gain knowledge through true data scienceexploring that data and advancing our understanding of biology.

The last area in fundamental research is our graduate school. During the last strategic plan, we developed the St. Jude Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, which offers a PhD and two masters programs.

Were going to expand that over the coming six years by increasing the number of students in the Biomedical Sciences PhD, the Master of Science in Global Child Health and the Master of Science in Clinical Investigations programs. We will also create a new masters program in data science. That will bring a new population of students to campus, which will further enhance our scientific enterprise.

Pediatric cancer is our next area of focus. This has always been our institutions major focus. This area encompasses $3.7 billion of the operating dollars we will spend over the next six years. Although weve invested heavily in this effort in the past, were going to expand it significantly.

Were going to focus on pediatric cancers where the least progress has been madecancers that are incurable and relapsed diseaseand gain insights into how we can change the outlook for those cancers.

The first area of investment is new faculty10 laboratory-based individuals who will expand our research efforts in understanding the biology of cancer. Some of those faculty will go into the Center of Excellence in Leukemia, but others will focus on solid tumors, brain tumors, or on biologic aspects that cut across cancer types.

Our second area for expansion will focus on assessing new therapeutic approaches for the highest-risk cancers. We need to access and evaluate more new therapies in a rigorous manner to identify those which should be moved forward into frontline clinical trials. Pediatric cancer encompasses many different types of cancer.

To run clinical trials, you need a sufficient number of patients to be able to answer questions in a reasonable time frame. We need a way to identify the best new agents to move into clinical trials.

Our investment in preclinical testing will help us set up that infrastructure. Much of it was established in the last strategic plan, but it must be expanded so that we have the best pediatric cancer models and can assess single and combination therapies to see which are worth moving forward into clinical trials.

On the clinical trial front, we want to expand our infrastructure to run those clinical trialsnot only on our campus, but in collaborations across the United States and around the globe. To make progress in some of these high-risk pediatric cancers, we need many patients. For many of the high-risk cancers, there are not a sufficient number of patients in the United States to conduct the trials. We, therefore, need to set up global collaborative networks that can address these high-risk cancers.

So, were investing in our ability to access drugs through commercial sources, to rigorously assess these in preclinical models and to establish the global infrastructure to run these clinical trials with an associated translational science infrastructure second to none.

Our third emphasis under the cancer focus is cancer immunotherapy. We began our work in cancer immunotherapy decades ago. We developed the chimeric antigen receptor, or CAR, against CD-19. That is the basis for the FDA-approved therapy that is being used right now on a variety of different fronts. Over the last several years, weve also invested heavily in expanding our cancer immunotherapy efforts, primarily focused on CAR-modified T cells.

As part of this new strategic plan, we are creating a new program, the Translational Immunology and Immunotherapy Initiative. It will facilitate cross-departmental efforts focused on cancer immunotherapy and will explore the fundamental biology of chimeric antigen receptor approaches to cancer immunotherapy.

What makes an ideal antigen that can be attacked by a chimeric antigen receptor? How does one manipulate CAR T cells so that they undergo exhaustion and stop killing the tumor? How do we change that? And what are the features of the microenvironment that decrease the killing potency of CAR T cells? These will require significant investments, including additional faculty.

Another emphasis will be looking at long-term toxicities of the therapies we use to treat children with cancer. As we cure more and more pediatric cancers, we must continually look at the toxicities from therapy and figure out how to reduce those without sacrificing the ability to be cured. Part of that is precision medicine, and so we are continuing to invest in our genomic and pharmacogenomic efforts and our proton therapy center.

Part of reducing toxicities comes from learning from long-term survivors. So, we will continue to invest in St. Jude LIFE, our long-term, follow-up study. We will expand that to some of the newer pediatric cancer therapies, including immunotherapy and targeted agents. We will assess long-term complications from these therapeutic approaches and try to define which patients will be susceptible to these toxicities.

MO: I have to mention the obvious: $11.5 billion is quite the budget. Your new strategic plan is work that, one could argue, might be on par or exceeds the coordination and budget required to realize multiple projects, say, at the World Health Organization or even at some U.S. federal agencies. What did it take for you and your team at St. Jude to get to this point?

JD: There are an incredible number of donors across the United States who support St. Jude. Our goal is to make sure every dollar is spent wisely and effectively in pursuit of our missionto advance cures and means of prevention for pediatric catastrophic diseases through research and treatment. This carries a great responsibility for us to seek the maximum possible impact to improve outcomes for childhood cancer.

We have the ideal team at St. Jude to execute this. Our leadership meets multiple times each week. Two years ago, we began strategically looking at the most pressing issues in the field of pediatric cancer. We discussed which areas represented the greatest opportunities for St. Jude to contribute. We talked to many experts inside and outside of the institutionaround the globeand made hard decisions as we went forward.

Strategic planning is deeply engrained at St. Jude as a rigorous process that is part of our scientific culture. We knew it was going to take two years to develop this plan. We dont hire consultants; we do it all ourselves. Faculty across the institution participated in the development of priorities and goals for this strategic plan via structured meetings.

As we developed the strategic plan over those two years, there were many ideas we critically assessed, and we often said, Its not really best for St. Jude to pursue that. In the end, we aligned on goals that collectively bring the prospect of remarkable benefits to the field of childhood cancer, and to children with cancer everywhere.

Every child who comes on this campus is part of our mission. We provide them with the best care possible. We do that in the context of research studies, so that were learning from every single patient. That means were not only helping children today; were also advancing cures for children tomorrow.

Weve rolled out the new strategic plan across campus during the last month, and the excitement is palpable. Our commitment continues long after the strategic plans launch.

We have routine strategic planning retreats, where we assess the goals for the year, evaluate progress against the prior years goals, perform talent assessments and proactively seek out emerging opportunities. Every employee on campus will develop yearly goals that cascade down from the goals of this plan.

As we develop this roadmap, we know there are going to be new ideas. Charlie can tell you about a process incorporated into the strategic plan that allows us to not only move forward on this roadmap, but also add initiatives as new ideas emerge.

Charles Roberts: Its a process we began with the last strategic plan, called our blue-sky process. As we launch a strategic plan, weve identified the most exciting opportunities and challenges at that point in time.

However, we fully realize that we dont know whats coming next. New discoveries will be made, and new opportunities will emerge. Via the blue-sky process, weve set aside substantial funds every year to invest in the pursuit of emerging opportunities suggested by faculty and staff.

Ideas that have emerged from the blue-sky process have been phenomenal. Our engagement with World Health Organization (WHO)a collaboration to raise childhood cancer survival rates internationallyis one example.

The Center for Modeling Pediatric Diseases is another example. This center makes iPS cells that come from patients so that we can investigate mechanisms that underlie cancer predisposition.

In another blue-sky project, were looking at DNA methylation to characterize pediatric solid tumors with the goal of identifying new therapeutic opportunities. Some of our immunotherapy initiatives also came out of the blue-sky process. Were looking forward to growing our blue-sky endeavors as we go forward.

Were coming out of a six-year strategic plan in which we increased our number of cancer patients by 20%, with 30% new faculty, 23% more staff, many large-scale construction projects. And were now going into a new strategic plan that is 60% larger than our prior plan.

The other central part of our strategic planning process focuses on the importance of collaboration. We have systematically incorporated a focus upon collaboration into our entire strategic planning and execution process. Our strategic planning efforts began by bringing together the intellectual resources of faculty and staff at St. Jude. This yielded projects that have interactions between many investigators on campus.

We recognize, however, that were still a relatively small institution, and theres a lot of expertise outside. We asked: How can we engage top scientists to tackle problems related to cancer and other catastrophic illnesses of childhood?

In pursuit of this, during our last strategic plan, we created the St. Jude Research Collaboratives, in which we fund investigators from multiple institutions who collaborate with investigators at St. Jude.

Initially, we were planning to fund two or three Collaboratives. However, they were remarkably successful, and top scientists eagerly joined.

Consequently, weve grown the program to five St. Jude Research Collaboratives already. These teams are each funded at an average of $8 million over 5 years, so each investigator is getting R01-level funding, or a little bit better. This has been a phenomenal success.

In the new strategic plan, were going to grow the program to a steady state of 11 funded collaboratives, representing close to a $90 million investment. So far, three of the Collaboratives are directly focused on childhood cancer. A fourth is a basic science-focused project relevant to childhood cancer. Were excited about the growth of this collaboration-focused program.

Lastly, Id like to address global collaboration. If you look across the globe, in low- and middle-income countries, the cure rates for childhood cancer are less than 20%.

This is a problem we know we can solve. Weve proven in the United States we can drive the cure rate to 80%. How can we help the rest of the world?

Because of the resources brought to us by our donors, we are able to think about these things, and so were now collaborating around the globe to drive cure rates forward for childhood cancer worldwide.

JD: As an example of new ideas and how rapidly we can act on them, Id like to tell you about a new blue-sky proposal that came up at the end of the last strategic plan. This idea was precipitated at a faculty retreat. One of our senior investigators was presenting, and during a coffee break, someone said, Well, what if you did this? That emerged into a blue-sky proposal, Seeing the Invisible in Protein Kinases. This was work from Dr. Babis Kalodimos, our Structural Biology department chair. He had a Science paper that came out several months ago, where he used the high-field NMR spectroscopy to look at the structure of the ABL kinase. He was able to identify transient conformational states that help to explain how resistant mutants work.

This gave us new insights into transient states that exist in molecules that can only be seen under high-field NMR, not with other structural biology approaches.

Based on that, we started thinking, Well, what if you did this on all kinases? What if you just did it against tyrosine kinases, serine kinases, receptor tyrosine kinases? What new rules would emerge from this? What would it tell us about families of kinases? What would it tell us about mechanisms of inhibition to kinase inhibitors? What might it tell us about new approaches to developing drugs against protein tyrosine kinases?

And since kinases are a major focus for targeted therapy, there was great excitement about pursuing these studies. Dr. Kalodimos developed the proposal and brought it forward; however, it was clear that this effort would be beyond the scope of our blue-sky process.

Blue-sky initiatives are usually somewhere in the $12 million range, and this was north of $30 million. Yet, in the end after thorough internal and external reviews, the project will move forward as part of the new strategic plan..

This is an approach that will give us fundamental knowledge and can have a profound impact on our understanding of a major class of targets for next-generation therapy.

MO: If I recall accurately, St. Jude has a network of partnerships with a few dozen countries worldwide. Does this plan call for an expansion of efforts within each of those countries? And how many of them?

JD: When I took over in 2014, we had what we called the International Outreach Program, which was 24 programs in 17 countries. During the programs 25-year history, we had made great progress. We were making significant impact and changing the outlook for children with cancer in those 17 countries. But we were affecting only about 3% of children with cancer across the globe, and the International Outreach Program was not scalable.

So, at the beginning of the last strategic plan, we recruited Dr. Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo. He developed a vision that after assessing, we decided to move forward on. This new effort encompasses the Department of Pediatric Global Medicine, St. Jude Global and the St. Jude Global Alliance.

These are all integrated. We developed a model that we think is scalable around the world, and we think this model ultimately can affect children with cancer everywhere.

The idea is that first we must train a workforce to treat children with cancer around the globe. We cant train the workforce ourselves, but we can train the trainers, who will then train the workforce.

More:
St. Jude's $11.5B, six-year plan aims to improve global outcomes for children with cancer and catastrophic diseases - The Cancer Letter

IPS Cell Therapy Comments Off on St. Jude’s $11.5B, six-year plan aims to improve global outcomes for children with cancer and catastrophic diseases – The Cancer Letter | May 15th, 2021

Focus on Immuno-Oncology and Next-Generation Vaccines is Supported with a Strong Balance Sheet

Visit link:
Celsion Corporation Reports First Quarter 2021 Financial Results and Provides Business Update

Global News Feed Comments Off on Celsion Corporation Reports First Quarter 2021 Financial Results and Provides Business Update | May 15th, 2021

CRANBURY, N.J., May 14, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --  PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: PMVP), a precision oncology company pioneering the discovery and development of small molecule, tumor-agnostic therapies targeting p53 mutants, today reported financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2021 and provided corporate highlights.

See the original post here:
PMV Pharmaceuticals Reports First Quarter 2021 Financial Results and Corporate Highlights

Global News Feed Comments Off on PMV Pharmaceuticals Reports First Quarter 2021 Financial Results and Corporate Highlights | May 15th, 2021

LEXINGTON, Mass., May 14, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Keros Therapeutics, Inc. (“Keros” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq: KROS), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of novel treatments for patients suffering from hematological and musculoskeletal disorders with high unmet medical need, today announced results from a preclinical study of KER-012 on pulmonary and cardiac dysfunction in an established rodent model of pulmonary arterial hypertension (“PAH”) at the virtual American Thoracic Society International Conference held May 14 through 19, 2021. Additional data from a previously conducted nonclinical study in cynomolgus monkeys was also included in the presentation.

The rest is here:
Keros Therapeutics Presents Results from Preclinical Study of KER-012 in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension at the American Thoracic Society...

Global News Feed Comments Off on Keros Therapeutics Presents Results from Preclinical Study of KER-012 in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension at the American Thoracic Society… | May 15th, 2021

TORONTO, May 14, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Spectral Medical Inc. (“Spectral” or the “Company”) (TSX: EDT), a late stage theranostic company advancing therapeutic options for sepsis and septic shock, as well as commercializing a new proprietary platform targeting the renal replacement therapy market through its wholly-owned subsidiary Dialco Medical Inc. (Dialco), today announced its financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2021, and provided a corporate update.

Visit link:
Spectral Announces First Quarter Results and Provides Corporate Update

Global News Feed Comments Off on Spectral Announces First Quarter Results and Provides Corporate Update | May 15th, 2021

MIAMI, May 14, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Longeveron Inc. (NASDAQ: LGVN) ("Longeveron" or "Company"), a clinical stage biotechnology company developing cellular therapies for chronic aging-related and life-threatening conditions, today provided a business update regarding a number of ongoing clinical trials, and also reported its financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2021.

See the original post:
Longeveron Inc. Provides Corporate Update and Reports First Quarter 2021 Financial Results

Global News Feed Comments Off on Longeveron Inc. Provides Corporate Update and Reports First Quarter 2021 Financial Results | May 15th, 2021

ISELIN, N.J., May 14, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Outlook Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: OTLK), a?late clinical-stage?biopharmaceutical company?working to develop the first FDA-approved ophthalmic formulation of bevacizumab?for use in retinal?indications, today announced recent corporate highlights and financial results for its fiscal second quarter ended March 31, 2021.Outlook Therapeutics also provided a clinical development and pre-commercialization update on ONS-5010 / LYTENAVA™ (bevacizumab-vikg), its investigational ophthalmic formulation of bevacizumab for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD) and other retinal indications.“Outlook Therapeutics continues to advance ONS-5010 towards a BLA filing for wet AMD. Having reported promising results from two of the three clinical trials for our planned BLA, we are now in the home stretch and focused on the topline data readout next quarter from NORSE TWO, our pivotal Phase 3 study,” commented Lawrence A. Kenyon, President, CEO and CFO of Outlook Therapeutics. “Additionally, with the funds raised in February, we are well positioned to complete NORSE TWO and prepare the BLA. We are excited about the upcoming clinical milestones and look forward to providing future updates as we continue to advance ONS-5010.”

Read the original:
Outlook Therapeutics Reports Financial Results for Second Quarter of Fiscal Year 2021 and Provides Corporate Update

Global News Feed Comments Off on Outlook Therapeutics Reports Financial Results for Second Quarter of Fiscal Year 2021 and Provides Corporate Update | May 15th, 2021

- First Patient Dosed in Phase 1 AL102 Combination Trial with Novartis’ Anti-BCMA Agent for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma -

See more here:
Ayala Pharmaceuticals Reports First Quarter 2021 Financial Results and Provides Business Update

Global News Feed Comments Off on Ayala Pharmaceuticals Reports First Quarter 2021 Financial Results and Provides Business Update | May 15th, 2021

- Anticipate Emergency Use Submission for SARS-CoV-2Antibody Biosensor Test in the Second Half of 2021-

Read the original here:
GBS Inc. Reports First Quarter 2021 Financial Results and Recent Business Highlights

Global News Feed Comments Off on GBS Inc. Reports First Quarter 2021 Financial Results and Recent Business Highlights | May 15th, 2021

Hamilton, Bermuda, May 14, 2021 – Auris Medical Holding Ltd. (NASDAQ: EARS), a clinical-stage company dedicated to developing therapeutics that address important unmet medical needs in neurotology, rhinology and allergy and CNS disorders, today announced that it has reached the midpoint for enrollment in Part B of its Phase 2 proof-of-concept trial of AM-125 (intranasal betahistine) in the treatment of acute peripheral vertigo.

Here is the original post:
Auris Medical Reaches Midpoint for Enrollment in Part B of AM-125 Phase 2 TRAVERS Trial in Acute Peripheral Vertigo

Global News Feed Comments Off on Auris Medical Reaches Midpoint for Enrollment in Part B of AM-125 Phase 2 TRAVERS Trial in Acute Peripheral Vertigo | May 15th, 2021

JERSEY CITY, N.J., May 14, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- SCYNEXIS, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCYX), a biotechnology company pioneering innovative medicines to overcome and prevent difficult-to-treat and drug-resistant infections, today reported that it has secured a $60 million term loan facility with Hercules Capital, Inc. (NYSE: HTGC) and Silicon Valley Bank (SVB). The capital strengthens SCYNEXIS’ balance sheet ahead of the anticipated commercial launch of Brexafemme, the expected trade name for ibrexafungerp, an oral antifungal product candidate for the treatment of vaginal yeast infections, which is under regulatory review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with a PDUFA target action date of June 1, 2021. This non-dilutive financing further extends SCYNEXIS’ projected cash runway into 2023, based on current operating plans.

See more here:
SCYNEXIS Secures Term Loan Facility for up to $60 Million with Hercules Capital and Silicon Valley Bank

Global News Feed Comments Off on SCYNEXIS Secures Term Loan Facility for up to $60 Million with Hercules Capital and Silicon Valley Bank | May 15th, 2021

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., May 14, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRAX), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company translating genetic insights into the development of therapies for central nervous system (CNS) disorders characterized by neuronal imbalance, today announced that management will participate in the following upcoming virtual investor conferences:

Read this article:
Praxis Precision Medicines to Present at Upcoming Investor Conferences

Global News Feed Comments Off on Praxis Precision Medicines to Present at Upcoming Investor Conferences | May 15th, 2021

Underwriters’ Full Exercise of Option Brings Gross Proceeds to $34.5 Million

Read more here:
Recro Announces Closing of Public Offering of Common Stock and Full Exercise of Underwriters’ Option to Purchase Additional Shares

Global News Feed Comments Off on Recro Announces Closing of Public Offering of Common Stock and Full Exercise of Underwriters’ Option to Purchase Additional Shares | May 15th, 2021

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. and AVENTURA, Fla., May 14, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Cytovia Therapeutics, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company developing allogeneic “off-the-shelf” gene-edited Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-NK cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and NK cell engager multifunctional antibodies, announced today that its CEO, Dr. Daniel Teper, will be presenting at the following industry conferences:

View original post here:
Cytovia Therapeutics CEO Dr. Daniel Teper to Present at Two Upcoming Conferences

Global News Feed Comments Off on Cytovia Therapeutics CEO Dr. Daniel Teper to Present at Two Upcoming Conferences | May 15th, 2021