The stem cell controversy is the consideration of the ethics of research involving the development, usage, and destruction of human embryos. Most commonly, this controversy focuses on embryonic stem cells. Not all stem cell research involves the creation, usage and destruction of human embryos. For example, adult stem cells, amniotic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells do not involve creating, using or destroying human embryos and thus are minimally, if at all, controversial.

The use of stem cells has been happening for decades. In 1998, scientists discovered how to extract stem cells from human embryos. This discovery led to moral ethics questions concerning research involving embryo cells, such as what restrictions should be made on studies using these types of cells? At what point does one consider life to begin? Is it just to destroy an embryo cell if it has the potential to cure countless numbers of patients? Political leaders are debating how to regulate and fund research studies that involve the techniques used to remove the embryo cells. No clear consensus has emerged. Other recent discoveries may extinguish the need for embryonic stem cells.[1]

Since stem cells have the ability to differentiate into any type of cell, they offer something in the development of medical treatments for a wide range of conditions. Treatments that have been proposed include treatment for physical trauma, degenerative conditions, and genetic diseases (in combination with gene therapy). Yet further treatments using stem cells could potentially be developed thanks to their ability to repair extensive tissue damage.[2]

Great levels of success and potential have been shown from research using adult stem cells. In early 2009, the FDA approved the first human clinical trials using embryonic stem cells. Embryonic stem cells can become all cell types of the body which is called totipotent. Adult stem cells are generally limited to differentiating into different cell types of their tissue of origin. However, some evidence suggests that adult stem cell plasticity may exist, increasing the number of cell types a given adult stem cell can become. In addition, embryonic stem cells are considered more useful for nervous system therapies, because researchers have struggled to identify and isolate neural progenitors from adult tissues[citation needed]. Embryonic stem cells, however, might be rejected by the immune system - a problem which wouldn't occur if the patient received his or her own stem cells.

Some stem cell researchers are working to develop techniques of isolating stem cells that are as potent as embryonic stem cells, but do not require a human embryo.

Some believe that human skin cells can be coaxed to "de-differentiate" and revert to an embryonic state. Researchers at Harvard University, led by Kevin Eggan, have attempted to transfer the nucleus of a somatic cell into an existing embryonic stem cell, thus creating a new stem cell line.[3] Another study published in August 2006 also indicates that differentiated cells can be reprogrammed to an embryonic-like state by introducing four specific factors, resulting in induced pluripotent stem cells.[4]

Researchers at Advanced Cell Technology, led by Robert Lanza, reported the successful derivation of a stem cell line using a process similar to preimplantation genetic diagnosis, in which a single blastomere is extracted from a blastocyst.[5] At the 2007 meeting of the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR),[6] Lanza announced that his team had succeeded in producing three new stem cell lines without destroying the parent embryos. "These are the first human embryonic cell lines in existence that didn't result from the destruction of an embryo." Lanza is currently in discussions with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to determine whether the new technique sidesteps U.S. restrictions on federal funding for ES cell research.[7]

Anthony Atala of Wake Forest University says that the fluid surrounding the fetus has been found to contain stem cells that, when utilized correctly, "can be differentiated towards cell types such as fat, bone, muscle, blood vessel, nerve and liver cells". The extraction of this fluid is not thought to harm the fetus in any way. He hopes "that these cells will provide a valuable resource for tissue repair and for engineered organs as well".[8]

The status of the human embryo and human embryonic stem cell research is a controversial issue as, with the present state of technology, the creation of a human embryonic stem cell line requires the destruction of a human embryo. Stem cell debates have motivated and reinvigorated the pro-life movement, whose members are concerned with the rights and status of the embryo as an early-aged human life. They believe that embryonic stem cell research instrumentalizes and violates the sanctity of life and is tantamount to murder.[9] The fundamental assertion of those who oppose embryonic stem cell research is the belief that human life is inviolable, combined with the belief that human life begins when a sperm cell fertilizes an egg cell to form a single cell.

A portion of stem cell researchers use embryos that were created but not used in in vitro fertility treatments to derive new stem cell lines. Most of these embryos are to be destroyed, or stored for long periods of time, long past their viable storage life. In the United States alone, there have been estimates of at least 400,000 such embryos.[10] This has led some opponents of abortion, such as Senator Orrin Hatch, to support human embryonic stem cell research.[11] See Also Embryo donation.

Original post:
Stem cell controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Understanding Cancer -- Diagnosis and Treatment How Is Cancer Diagnosed?

The earlier cancer is diagnosed and treated, the better the chance of its being cured. Some types of cancer -- such as those of the skin, breast, mouth, testicles, prostate, and rectum -- may be detected by routine self-exam or other screening measures before the symptoms become serious. Most cases of cancer are detected and diagnosed after a tumor can be felt or when other symptoms develop. In a few cases, cancer is diagnosed incidentally as a result of evaluating or treating other medical conditions.

Cancer diagnosis begins with a thorough physical exam and a complete medical history. Laboratory studies of blood, urine, and stool can detect abnormalities that may indicate cancer. When a tumor is suspected, imaging tests such as X-rays, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, and fiber-optic endoscopy examinations help doctors determine the cancer's location and size. To confirm the diagnosis of most cancers , a biopsy needs to be performed in which a tissue sample is removed from the suspected tumor and studied under a microscope to check for cancer cells.

Read more here:
Cancer Center: Types, Symptoms, Causes, Tests, and ...

Characterization of isolated human SHEDs and DPSCs for use in transplantation studies. Flow cytometry analysis showed that the SHEDs and DPSCs expressed a set of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) markers (i.e., CD90, CD73, and CD105), but not endothelial/hematopoietic markers (i.e., CD34, CD45, CD11b/c, and HLA-DR) (Table 1). Like human BMSCs, both the SHEDs and DPSCs exhibited adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic differentiation as described previously (refs. 16, 17, and data not shown). The majority of SHEDs and DPSCs coexpressed several neural lineage markers: nestin (neural stem cells), doublecortin (DCX; neuronal progenitor cells), III-tubulin (early neuronal cells), NeuN (mature neurons), GFAP (neural stem cells and astrocytes), S-100 (Schwann cells), and A2B5 and CNPase (oligodendrocyte progenitor cells), but not adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) or myelin basic protein (MBP) (mature oligodendrocytes) (Figure 1A and Table 1). This expression profile was confirmed by immunohistochemical analyses (Figure 1B).

Characterization of the SHEDs and DPSCs used for transplantation. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of the neural cell lineage markers expressed in SHEDs. Note that most of the SHEDs and DPSCs coexpressed neural stem and multiple progenitor markers, but not mature oligodendrocytes (APC and MBP). (B) Confocal images showing SHEDs coexpressed nestin, GFAP, and DCX. SHEDs also expressed markers for oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (A2B5 and CNPase), but not for mature oligodendrocytes (APC and MBP). Scale bar: 10 m. (C) Real-time RT-PCR analysis of the expression of neurotrophic factors. Results are expressed as fold increase compared with the level expressed in skin fibroblasts. Data represent the average measurements for each cell type from 3 independent donors. This set of experiments was repeated twice and yielded similar results. Data represent the mean SEM. *P < 0.01 compared with BMSCs and fibroblasts (Fbs).

Flow cytometry of stem cells from humans

Next, we examined the expression of representative neurotrophic factors by real-time PCR. Both the SHEDs and DPSCs expressed glial cellderived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) at more than 3 to 5 times the levels expressed by skin-derived fibroblasts or BMSCs (Figure 1C).

We further characterized the transcriptomes of SHEDs and BMSCs by cDNA microarray analysis. This gene expression analysis revealed a 2.0-fold difference in the expression of 3,318 of 41,078 genes between SHEDs and BMSCs. Of these, 1,718 genes were expressed at higher levels in the SHEDs and 1,593 genes were expressed at lower levels (data not shown). The top 30 genes showing higher expression in the SHEDs were in the following ontology categories: extracellular and cell surface region, cell proliferation, and tissue/embryonic development (Table 2).

Functional gene classification in SHEDs versus BMSCs

SHEDs and DPSCs promoted locomotor recovery after SCI. To compare the neuroregenerative activities of human SHEDs and DPSCs with those of human BMSCs and human skin fibroblasts, we transplanted the cells into the completely transected SCs, as described in Methods, and evaluated locomotion recovery using the Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan locomotor rating scale (BBB scale) (24). Remarkably, the animals that received SHEDs or DPSCs exhibited a significantly higher BBB score during the entire observation period, compared with BMSC-transplanted, fibroblast-transplanted, or PBS-injected control rats (Figure 2A). Importantly, their superior recoveries were evident soon after the operation, during the acute phase of SCI. After the recovery period (5 weeks after the operation), the rats that had received SHEDs were able to move 3 joints of hind limb coordinately and walk without weight support (P < 0.01; Supplemental Videos 1 and 2), while the BMSC- or fibroblast-transplanted rats exhibited only subtle movements of 12 joints. These results demonstrate that the transplantation of SHEDs or DPSCs during the acute phase of SCI significantly improved the recovery of hind limb locomotor function. Since the level of recovery was similar in the SHED- and DPSC-transplanted rats, we focused on the phenotypical examination of SHED-transplanted rats to elucidate how tooth-derived stem cells promoted the regeneration of the completely transected rat SC.

Engrafted SHEDs promote functional recovery of the completely transected SC. (A) Time course of functional recovery of hind limbs after complete transection of the SC. A total of 1 106 SHEDs, DPSCs, BMSCs, or fibroblasts were transplanted into the SCI immediately after transection. Data represent the mean SEM. **P < 0.001, *P < 0.01 compared with SCI models injected with PBS. (BD) Representative images (B and C) and quantification (D) of NF-Mpositive nerve fibers in sagittal sections of a completely transected SC, at 8 weeks after SCI. Dashed lines outline the SC. Insets are magnified images of boxed areas in B and C. (D) Nerve fiber quantification, representing the average of 3 experiments performed under the same conditions. The x axis indicates specific locations along the rostrocaudal axis of the SC (3 mm rostral and caudal to the epicenter), and y axis indicates the percentage of NF-Mpositive fibers compared with that of the sham-operated SCs at the ninth thoracic spinal vertebrate (Th9) level. Data represent the mean SEM. *P < 0.05 compared with SCI models injected with PBS. Scale bars: 100 m and inset 20 m (B) and 50 m (C). Asterisks in B and C indicate the epicenter of the lesion.

SHEDs regenerated the transected corticospinal tract and raphespinal serotonergic axons. To examine whether engrafted SHEDs affect the preservation of neurofilaments, we performed immunohistochemical analyses with an antineurofilament M (NF-M) mAb, 8 weeks after transection. Compared with the PBS-treated control SCs, the SHED-transplanted SCs exhibited greater preservation of NF-positive axons from 3 mm rostral to 3 mm caudal to the transected lesion site (Figure 2, B and C; asterisk indicates epicenter). The percentages of NF-positive axons in the epicenter of the SHED-transplanted and control SCs were 35.8% 13.0% and 8.7% 3.4%, respectively, relative to sham-treated SCs (Figure 2D).

Regeneration of both the corticospinal tract (CST) and the descending serotonergic raphespinal axons is important for the recovery of hind limb locomotor function in rat SCI. We therefore examined whether these axons had extended beyond the epicenter in the SHED-transplanted SCs. The CST axons were traced with the anterograde tracer biotinylated dextran amine (BDA), which was injected into the sensorimotor cortex. The serotonergic raphespinal axons were immunohistochemically detected by a mAb that specifically reacts with serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT]), which is synthesized within the brain stem. We found that both BDA- and 5-HTpositive fibers extended as far as 3 mm caudal to the epicenter in the SHED-transplanted but not the control group (Figures 3 and 4). Furthermore, some BDA- and 5-HTpositive boutons could be seen apposed to neurons in the caudal stump (Figure 3D and Figure 4C), suggesting that the regenerated axons had established new neural connections. Notably, although the number of descending axons extending beyond the epicenter was small, we observed many of them penetrating the scar tissue of the rostral stump (Figure 3A and Figure 4A). The percentages of 5-HTpositive axons of the SHED-transplanted SCs at 1 and 3 mm rostral to the epicenter were 58.9% 3.9% and 78.3% 7.4% relative to sham-treated SC, respectively (Figure 4D). These results demonstrate that the engrafted SHEDs promoted the recovery of hind limb locomotion via the preservation and regeneration of transected axons, even in the microenvironment of the damaged CNS.

View post:
Human Dental Pulp-Derived Stem Cells Promote Locomotor ...

High levels of active TGF- in the bone marrow and abnormalities in bone remodeling are associated with multiple skeletal disorders. Genetic mutations in the TGF- signaling pathway cause premature activation of matrix latent TGF- and may manifest with various skeletal defects. There are additional diseases that result in high levels of active TGF-, which may contribute to the pathology. Here, we discuss how abnormal TGF- signaling results in uncoupled bone remodeling, mainly by loss of site-directed recruitment of MSCs that causes aberrant bone formation. Direct or indirect inhibition of TGF- signaling may provide potential therapeutic options for these disorders.

Genetic disorders. The critical role of TGF-1 in the reversal phase of bone remodeling is demonstrated by the range of skeletal disorders resulting from mutations in genes involved in TGF-1 signaling. Camurati-Engelmann disease (CED), characterized by a fusiform thickening of the diaphysis of the long bones and skull, is caused by mutations in TGFB1 that result in premature activation of TGF-1 (7174). Approximately 11 different TGFB1 mutations have been identified from families affected by CED (75, 76). All of the mutations are located in the region encoding LAP, either destabilizing LAP disulfide bridging or affecting secretion of the protein, both of which increase TGF-1 signaling, as confirmed by in vitro cell cultures and mouse models. Bone histology sections from patients with CED show decreased trabecular connectivity despite normal bone histomorphometric parameters with respect to osteoblast and osteoclast numbers (76, 77), suggestive of uncoupled bone remodeling. In vitro, the ratio of active to total TGF-1 in conditioned medium from cells expressing the CED mutant TGF-1 is significantly higher and enhances MSC migration (18). Targeted recruitment of MSCs to the bone-remodeling site is likely disrupted, secondary to loss of a TGF- gradient.

Elevations in TGF- signaling have also been observed in many genetic connective tissue disorders with craniofacial, skeletal, skin, and cardiovascular manifestations, including Marfan syndrome (MFS), Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS), and Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome (SGS). MFS is caused by mutations in fibrillin and often results in aortic dilation, myopia, bone overgrowth, and joint laxity. Fibrillin is deposited in the ECM and normally binds TGF-, rendering it inactive. In MFS, the decreased level of fibrillin enhances TGF- activity (78). LDS is caused by inactivating mutations in genes encoding TRI and TRII (79). Physical manifestations include arterial aneurysms, hypertelorism, bifid uvula/cleft palate, and bone overgrowth resulting in arachnodactyly, joint laxity, and scoliosis. Pathologic analyses of affected tissue suggest chronically elevated TGF- signaling, despite the inactivating mutation (79). The mechanism of enhanced TGF- signaling remains under investigation. SGS is caused by mutations in the v-ski avian sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (SKI; refs. 80, 81) and causes physical features similar to those of MFS plus craniosynostosis. SKI negatively regulates SMAD-dependent TGF- signaling by impeding SMAD2 and SMAD3 activation, preventing nuclear translocation of the SMAD4 complex, and inhibiting TGF- target gene output by competing with p300/CBP for SMAD binding and recruiting transcriptional repressor proteins, such as mSin3A and HDACs (8284).

The neurocutaneous syndrome neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) has been noted to have skeletal features similar to those of CED, MFS, and LDS, including kyphoscoliosis, osteoporosis, and tibial pseudoarthrosis. Hyperactive TGF-1 signaling has been implicated as the primary factor underlying the pathophysiology of the osseous defects in Nf1fl/Col2.3Cre mice, a model of NF1 that closely recapitulates the skeletal abnormalities found in human disease (85). The exact mechanisms mediating mutant neurofibrominassociated enhancement of TGF- production and signaling remain unknown.

Osteoarthritis. While genetic disorders are rare, they have provided critical insight into the pathophysiology of more common disorders. Uncoupled bone remodeling accompanies the onset of osteoarthritis. TGF-1 is activated in subchondral bone in response to altered mechanical loading in an anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT) mouse model of osteoarthritis (86). High levels of active TGF-1 induced formation of nestin+ MSC clusters via activation of ALK5-SMAD2/3. MSCs underwent osteoblast differentiation in these clusters, leading to formation of marrow osteoid islets. Transgenic expression of active TGF-1 in osteoblastic cells alone was sufficient to induce osteoarthritis, whereas direct inhibition of TGF- activity in subchondral bone attenuated the degeneration of articular cartilage. Knockout of Tgfbr2 in nestin+ MSCs reduced osteoarthritis development after ACLT compared with wild-type mice, which confirmed that MSCs are the target cell population of TGF- signaling. High levels of active TGF-1 in subchondral bone likely disrupt the TGF- gradient and interfere with targeted migration of MSCs. Furthermore, mutations of ECM proteins that bind to latent TGF-s, such as small leucine-rich proteoglycans (87) and fibrillin (88), or mutations in genes involved in activation of TGF-, such as in CED (76) and LDS (89), are associated with high osteoarthritis incidence. Osteoblast differentiation of MSCs in aberrant locations appears histologically as subchondral bone osteoid islets and alters the thickness of the subchondral plate and calcified cartilage zone, changes known to be associated with osteoarthritis (90, 91). A computer-simulated model found that a minor increase in the size of the subchondral bone (1%2%) causes significant changes in the mechanical load properties on articular cartilage, which likely leads to degeneration (86). Importantly, inhibition of the TGF- signaling pathway delayed the development of osteoarthritis in both mouse and rat models (86).

MSCs in bone loss. Aging leads to deterioration of tissue and organ function. Skeletal aging is especially dramatic: bone loss in both women and men begins as early as the third decade, immediately after peak bone mass. Aging bone loss occurs when bone formation does not adequately compensate for osteoclast bone resorption during remodeling. Age-associated osteoporosis was previously believed to be due to a decline in survival and function of osteoblasts and osteoprogenitors; however, recent work by Park and colleagues found that mature osteoblasts and osteoprogenitors are actually nonreplicative cells and require constant replenishment from bone marrow MSCs (92). When MSCs fail to migrate to bone-resorptive sites or are unable to commit and differentiate into osteoblasts, new bone formation is impaired. Therefore, insufficient recruitment of MSCs, or their differentiation to osteoblasts, at the bone remodeling surface may contribute to the decline in bone formation in the elderly.

There are multiple hypotheses regarding the decreased osteogenic potential of MSCs during aging. For example, during aging, the bone marrow environment has an increased concentration of ROS and lipid oxidation that may decrease osteoblast differentiation, yet increase osteoclast activity (93, 94). MSCs also undergo senescence, which decreases proliferative capacity and contributes to decreased bone formation (95, 96). Cellular senescence involves the secretion of a plethora of factors, including TGF-, which induces expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors 2A and 2B (p16INK4A and p15INK4B, respectively; refs. 97).

Microgravity experienced by astronauts during spaceflight causes severe physiological alterations in the human body, including a 1%2% loss of bone mass every month during spaceflight (98). Several studies have shown decreases in osteoblastic markers of bone formation and increases in bone resorption (99101). The underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for the apparent concurrent decrease in bone formation and increase in bone resorption remain under investigation. Work by the McDonald group suggests that bone remodeling may become uncoupled under zero-gravity conditions secondary to decreased RhoA activity and resultant changes in actin stress fiber formation (102). In modeled microgravity, cultured human MSCs exhibit disruption of F-actin stress fibers within three hours of initiation of microgravity; the fibers are completely absent after seven days. RhoA activity is significantly reduced, and introduction of an adenoviral construct expressing constitutively active RhoA can reverse the elimination of stress fibers, significantly increasing markers of osteoblast differentiation (102). Under zero-gravity conditions, RhoA is unable to bind to its receptor, and a sufficient number of MSCs may not be able to migrate correctly to the bone-resorptive site for osteoblast differentiation, ultimately leading to bone loss with every cycle of remodeling.

Bone metastases are a frequent complication of cancer and often have both osteolytic and osteoblastic features, indicative of dysregulated bone remodeling. The importance of the bone marrow microenvironment contributing to the spread of cancer was first described in 1889 (103), postulating that tumor cells can grow only if they are in a conducive environment. Activation of matrix TGF- during bone remodeling plays a central role in the initiation of bone metastases and tumor expansion by regulating osteolytic and prometastatic factors (reviewed in refs. 104110). For example, TGF- can induce osteoclastic bone destruction by upregulating tumor cell expression of PTHrP and IL-11. Additionally, upregulation of CXCR4 by TGF- may home cancer cells to bones.

Originally posted here:
JCI - Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and TGF- ...

General Information About Adult Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)

The NHLs are a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative malignancies with differing patterns of behavior and responses to treatment.[1]

Like Hodgkin lymphoma, NHL usually originates in lymphoid tissues and can spread to other organs. NHL, however, is much less predictable than Hodgkin lymphoma and has a far greater predilection to disseminate to extranodal sites. The prognosis depends on the histologic type, stage, and treatment.

Estimated new cases and deaths from NHL in the United States in 2015:[2]

NHL usually originates in lymphoid tissues.

Anatomy of the lymph system.

The NHLs can be divided into two prognostic groups: the indolent lymphomas and the aggressive lymphomas.

Indolent NHL types have a relatively good prognosis with a median survival as long as 20 years, but they usually are not curable in advanced clinical stages.[3] Early-stage (stage I and stage II) indolent NHL can be effectively treated with radiation therapy alone. Most of the indolent types are nodular (or follicular) in morphology.

The aggressive type of NHL has a shorter natural history, but a significant number of these patients can be cured with intensive combination chemotherapy regimens.

In general, with modern treatment of patients with NHL, overall survival at 5 years is over 60%. Of patients with aggressive NHL, more than 50% can be cured. The vast majority of relapses occur in the first 2 years after therapy. The risk of late relapse is higher in patients who manifest both indolent and aggressive histologies.[4]

Read more from the original source:
Adult Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment - National Cancer ...

World J Stem Cells. 2014 Apr 26; 6(2): 120133.

Venkata Ramesh Dasari, Krishna Kumar Veeravalli, Department of Cancer Biology and Pharmacology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL 61656, United States

Dzung H Dinh, Department of Neurosurgery and Illinois Neurological Institute, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL 61656, United States

Correspondence to: Dzung H Dinh, MD, Department of Neurosurgery and Illinois Neurological Institute, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, One Illini Drive, Peoria, IL 61605, United States. ude.ciu@hnidd

Telephone: +1- 309-6552642 Fax: +1-309-6713442

Received 2013 Oct 30; Revised 2014 Feb 19; Accepted 2014 Mar 11.

With technological advances in basic research, the intricate mechanism of secondary delayed spinal cord injury (SCI) continues to unravel at a rapid pace. However, despite our deeper understanding of the molecular changes occurring after initial insult to the spinal cord, the cure for paralysis remains elusive. Current treatment of SCI is limited to early administration of high dose steroids to mitigate the harmful effect of cord edema that occurs after SCI and to reduce the cascade of secondary delayed SCI. Recent evident-based clinical studies have cast doubt on the clinical benefit of steroids in SCI and intense focus on stem cell-based therapy has yielded some encouraging results. An array of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from various sources with novel and promising strategies are being developed to improve function after SCI. In this review, we briefly discuss the pathophysiology of spinal cord injuries and characteristics and the potential sources of MSCs that can be used in the treatment of SCI. We will discuss the progress of MSCs application in research, focusing on the neuroprotective properties of MSCs. Finally, we will discuss the results from preclinical and clinical trials involving stem cell-based therapy in SCI.

Keywords: Spinal cord injury, Mesenchymal stem cells, Bone marrow stromal cells, Umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells, Adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells

Core tip: Despite our deeper understanding of the molecular changes that occurs after the spinal cord injury (SCI), the cure for paralysis remains elusive. In this review, the pathophysiology of SCI and characteristics and potential sources of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that can be used in the treatment of SCI were discussed. We also discussed the progress of application of MSCs in research focusing on the neuroprotective properties of MSCs. Finally, we discussed the results from preclinical and clinical trials involving stem cell-based therapy in SCI.

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) continues to be a devastating injury to affected individuals and their families and exacts an enormous financial, psychological and emotional cost to them and to society. Despite years of research, the cure for paralysis remains elusive and current treatment is limited to early administration of high dose steroids and acute surgical intervention to minimize cord edema and the subsequent cascade of secondary delayed injury[1-3]. Recent advances in neurosciences and regenerative medicine have drawn attention to novel research methodologies for the treatment of SCI. In this review, we present our current understanding of spinal cord injury pathophysiology and the application of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the treatment of SCI. This review will be more useful for basic and clinical investigators in academia, industry and regulatory agencies as well as allied health professionals who are involved in stem cell research.

See the article here:
Mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of spinal cord ...

UMS#7=U/U'K 6U,leTC(HG~}fllvFp0LN*i0`U~1Y:,WxX*3h"jIDfU!`8) ty@$7;hi6 vCvZLEM{$DfCxh&dE#]}Q |Yk{=$ &}SyX((n&'weuQ:ir^fN?<4X/iJ`fdfRP2Yn}4:kqoGSP9%%!^]?#9+A^Qg Q2:?putgZW&w*8glqcVO~VYpKtBPbP$ra ;wA&r:r$|K!,_Q:xtr[Wmo6 _WI$ui`Z:[$J#);Ie;2Cr Ew bv@~[.LZB[DHCvkav-E! Kh$Y`X:PS=2kXpm@7E!LFFpnZ9&n0:64Y4ZS Md:K`Mc JOj {WybC8"UO_}v;noMTHc080C g7G Mbsu 8_bY} !ie-j"w)7=Xm_3!_cLI%[s}x5wC/F!QfG" V>UKlKkkst&e9~AAI.)cE;pFOx@n >gmA&C.]2~<=yQZ(^$x(X/'UB/CT_PyR -.hQ &5v :s5N !S%(VYQt>1Z*4Z-D' Q;(%zcLHaQ3_1>~W0{En6x&1GyX:^=6+{lJ2pr0dD `jV{ndd[T)x1#$ HxEpTxo+sEL!SfRn2/|V7zBi6yL{7@KG?m?MBVv:Kv]b=,-6]Y$N6wd/%t;>'7*zvy_hiUfPj)V1El=p2i -9;pRrV1P m[VQ;^+ Ouj{C&vmoI.-4,NDYs.le*Xbo`%f-W&$JE@pB8 !/hS}=yD'lV6_YId#]]BdblTjQ5;}<+CDnBc*LDe4.Wpt `x;"^ RyZVp< Fa8|;){dW+FZ[FU^|lZiV,/[W#3 &kVsaC(5pZuS:^Tb[PgUY>>A!N- (9g*RsX4*/w^;DzvYDC0,2ggAQ*Q_2;u{eMA7H"gE;:+c <"dX[IC1jmSp.TV5ZAdAIlRIb?ewv[i?^8}}yNW&s.e-$'b2HE/Xlrnhso3Cf8g1q%>8?'vS b#O`" LE*[2X^-]Mq]E"'_3;R5aoUPI$7aqSSR{rT{P=Ln0".Tt0sGuzm/DZp!8J>'7s'Ju3 DR"-ucH;4I.(Mkm w2YmeKRPX4C&m KCw2x4Y#<<:{hY>##ppmhsI(Q*WlkQJ k&QJ-k+ 3@p w>^=z }gx smemzTS`(5iaW Vt4_h['w)2V.U}@TC9>PeV C|q:>6<{~E~p1-|!goNC3qX)[U_ Cu@iwGmN^hvy e3F{fEtO^n^Y)otbVuf@^ "xe/*e!ZZxI1I2jzc%9dO?i~qA~&I/9~/_?9y.x s 0:?su SMaVEy/+Dzzcr2 c ^"[vv$ e.(E" wVv33MM3;dDN xcq1}b,yWEJ(P}tw2.:~z@1Cn#|n#({9OB7s:{x;Jl0Hp])~VTV4Ewqk'6NX=eFdkj GY([NB 9HacU,@VO*dVdhbD1_m@+:,$M.9v1Dj{yi[P|Nf{W6o#}+KtngUU IjUYQ18-3JV?9Z?S.`'{|o"W"-e$2EmvEYUJUZTf- 5M|9EMycu1xrL8:8z@7}?Kuq%%,3.Y })3@tE ?@y.):H'ESN.m<_~k'enXXPXQDXPhuwa{`iX;/x< S}F Is|!B6V0Q~< bF=|o?[*4#IzZJ3< ga7Gx[;0}dzhhkG@*~Vh0!mib(c:MhH(6[4ZQPAwBZTL]QV<87W=bc}?81A>7$(V!O}9 TK% .WU;2 upkUeKSYg-5sI,mY5g,bo?OoTL>Y.pHjK!tL )}61JFF-;G_6$-'TfEU#1&^;WtU8E!Ct%:_" 3lj:jp4F-m&'G1&N!9R4{IP46XrgTs%NBo ZfLnqmspXm0PXdN!ha@h % dKa!|rm:Zr6Tf_6Mg>DKss~:4;##r.i n JZ-*^[fp*ba-[j/b 1t$vN /Bs R4 +f[J_@IW%G h}Nn2|C? ADAJ~&K:70Z#qPB4p"2,h^n'04Rh@}7W2PwzqliNk*@p%-"K0KfoGC 4@1XTz4;]Z *; xrYBW!g}:b0A U6N k;B!I%;??B,qdG,Fg]kS8][] "e ,Za*{;,W*+c1K4G4/?.|6e+.d iT"&|o ^ )6fR9n/^@U{h;$!x"7[(Vx bD-1bS'K3q7xM)NExv@Mew[r7yw#,3T0.@d] 6jv8B gS[%ZmyC__4wn>mF"+Y?GT:4Wf*y!?^]]$ w+>^'T}?vZ5! d6yjhs;1QW,`` Q4(]. eq% BXr#{4h3s)lopYtYzxY"u%p,O4m`QvC` ;DVzz~Yg|yH)h1'"wWM{Z7hYc9J^0/3ko>L(7wpL3kez"kDLX v6-XHNHHq[ -(`EuxwYR/r-b9sfpNVNg*j6g'Lv7l9Z}b2m[/fLz1X'e^hKw0eY@D9X@|TQ-t+#zb07)Pm0{2lb%ITlHJw_qwrhAOP^ 5K]y`:=s{l&'(+bdz>" 7tF)mm!!*Ie_8ZJccy %T6{cbR ![tCK@$V?_^ z`Uf= ~U9_*1z|29]__Fv0Jm%D2VzHf]e>[%9{0Y)iT@FItX&25xKuge]}1*wGM}YB2@xJ,P@Fj/8$/jH{ Je06H8XI$.$)De(d6{fKjHybc<$eeq7(+^ [o~}oS3+#zUax|vHDL#8|U[L3$6FX6:vFzD[^8FA6Zeurj+}-!Jz #RQ(WYT3*.uY{5VvB'aP^B2Q!%498eh$Z;t{1 |;if0c#8j2ZKQ(J uB}hM]+~|o.gO{6(?@Q%EG=&{A&OuvYwO6j5|)j|=ec|rw22c0 tb0I]+RO>MNO]|yw"n;gGM@`%[Ep1"Cde`S^d.+&T~YbZS,8=? LXIR /jYX^UhWERm#wa;Pn/IgjxZ @sdq~p3@`=ADUD{{jo2c|~N>`/fNOx"z?-'I~^D03QwRr6lcw6UOH$4oDjAZ'jbD~M}+6IK&k%lw~%<'l(q~jQTo,bZ 39~B?]W=qpq8y&OlP8^]VM)Z@Q;zA*ImQ0Vd(nLg)ru+~l.RD%D?LhTyS-&V[Svo-Uf9Dqo{q]e -f-^Zj9fNJ0 "t;xGEXbW?7/xcF(`;vxC=savEBl|veTW'Jx1&;aV:.q.b#xfx^@bzF~j1b)QbS7LM#x|x& 57((m<6&t~z!d=!XI-?An="i= A k@RdBBR$#Ce"gc~!qs(Lhb6"A.HJ nG_?s6#??=*7jRa..tpREogVayeiV"J3;Aj-4AUP w0X$9IKj6N2ApjQ0jq.]D0b5vAp aRZ<_H;COKg'`BFTrJ,BZ]ykWSF;L4BdeiZt/=4'o%Cvj^T6Og{?-GO8Wt]I:FOn&)4mTi4~'9GjMa1N4knQ19 /vy,7em6E9wkKaAL%a0Kk]K)1RKX@IziR.a=wf `D3hx&YiQiyM>!s$`J^K#IA{-FH-o02@Xw zlP7qLK6IwsO#aLH/9}3KMq)Np8i T(* ^0c`v/o|:Wn54-u!Za}agK-L8lKyao/Tx2c/u)PPhr XK^if_ r9S).Vu80,'>;kj'[=5SK&* yjUUb+FMmC_gX8j%dt7:|C.j!qx1]]{$ArE0!*TIj)Y,"Laue]KfuMPI(o;/f #4#05;~amO#G;hQdK$&Z%V32;2ak:ehfTm1@L.]H>n^#S@RuhVo>V (HH|k:9sytn'VXuErhL jB- hKvB2L[@3pi2>0]z _6mFP0 6nw^hHy<==9]l0a/})3BrK~.R^G~%~y [G&nP 7 )BHKH0H TR3ZvR`XLR2XEAQ9}E T>9sB0 oo w{b2sWa87{,^A+[-4",w_Te*~9t?~xsd6>-Y1b#5_pja9V{Z8gwn:y}? 3]ZL-[qD;mte7["0gp0(^ *{ 4Ydmm-9k/D9B2yfA5{}s sKdMih:O {:N}MVBRtW?~4Ca+~X-RqinShX`-/]j:~4eAs!'IcS(8g>JO Ez_0@y I~i OSn bN:2D8/2nE-q~L"!Q ]DDNMG3WH(wb@1++!P:iD:BaY MQk #T>E[.*|.+j$ >0J_+mR6mZ.f]V)Zk80fa5;?.aK3@fVhGW$qWb| &'e9Ky6NyB} >2jS};H&)t041%RN%x S` $YZj^l.VrCjn9>n]VxrXdilvep`LBF)wx~H;.~]7fd)"(btn vU#heUGEiNVcv`tn)cvkk&M'Gmaev/+/V+vjSY0b!.lF_B[AHY~{~k }s|xThs`c9/}RA4!rU"ys{zF[)K+*-)IG Brm`[&?I%oTPTTGY.`]gn#92zI~QL~cd||R$~67jq}?fG:9,Q$*Sw8wMIf;eWG`**]4kAam~NKx&E-nT8QHobA4gXBL%gSi "* ;,1Hw2JU^[8W8 -vmr,cc|S-;}Nv,kXz$JcJ2lZ']%,o?MPg1L&Ts)<@$_qtUx*g}LkGh%EOMOu}n;~A 6u3NQ c[(:u':WaNTb2u*z6_xe9}k0p-GGfkBfgGIqrD5t,xWrcpH?r684F2Zxs4 L+7{Px8 d2 /,rr_a!Av E(O={W0Hm* A7h+[ q)&fgOm*ph^[Hyu{3e;mmbQ@qL1n[XyDo ) 3n_ f^g/yOz2@3H'=7IQM7YfJ&(*!n(cqx`$FA-"0 -V*L!dV~MX^hqroQm)Z$1++c@rphEoJLy @=~ )gCGa8)0d8rm+dx,_pq 9 .q-TfckXnyZE36}]ubI8hWwbXA^1@CM5S$sTarQ.(UIUwa%vKFnk)mpT3%07E)hA@HG%(UM5:V"*r2xJbJ+C@BI Ad% ) XwwXJ}GtfUF1D5_'Q2$ }gN,2&u&ssw0oJ[WGMhI/ZE1 mhAcH7l~zp>I?Eq Y9eV?^?9]AX Xb8k _S7o!E?M-<j'm*yeQh+!A`W vU4u ]l(-JkbXax=S|7qf'D?{)&UUM=uV?z(/-"@P@w>vDcw_i>4<+XVpb{;G*&:_D4 Pf;UZT&m/:1>!9k%1;;b/CJgAd6M4HO3S"TZcV;qz 2F/9^~q ,pnv~1cj5RL (WNWC+Wh!{Wbp[vVB2T^UN=fX*.< 4.vGcK.;)_ {5BjCy5%!tmlg$D.~SZ*Qks'YKNtJDaoI!NIJ!75]/8CD^gi0 eo.RxI,ksR1pI!1n//2p/eV;8JPtwo^'7wv1IFp/NB8o3bJ"Z!1%$AJD2x|tw{{j`;!;mi v'zmTS[@&.zhE[peq(xy5@"q p+2LI^KjMjR'cZeHOHBuu:|[SCI+3pG/dYt(F Jo&&mAiKp$'%C[`.F3@5]ZN $zITk}-}AU-(+qH7$cYZ62ImHY<$aom~AI<@Q$OPPH2&5f,G*NW4EVP{HMWrRbYtZqb/BE`3]<~i{v0c :h#2R}d6kZyAG&3`hX|LCP?%n FE6l:VWk:v=xvs#{((bT)Ru( wI[+)wJ-eAapV%9|ryc)IHcfZ9*Jdgf 4X-P,: C@SLr?~Dr@8x9r+[!nG-M;zlQ-;5!G.83`.&Y"qQpLKbNI7s&q4-!V4N+n%tu[?P9 Dp_ZdIft,'4&"aYiC'$|Z@/dU$twGk$kS/ }'{h |B< ,TPeAsNwz|M(a<~c{{x"??'#MO7 Lhu~~2HPQm, N?Yg%(o>[rd N` ZCrnTI)1%X-!cSQ53C[d,C@{Vt;u|8j_iefe%hG->xF8[X}%;NP#+ (qvARQs$LN5"J8-$geB(T]5,g {!LT3TP^cvoNaP1424eE=!%RJNhOsz2 =dNDA=7-oaRG&&}VE[%g

Read more:
Haematopoietic stem cells and early lymphoid progenitors ...

General Information About Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

NSCLC is any type of epithelial lung cancer other than small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The most common types of NSCLC are squamous cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma, but there are several other types that occur less frequently, and all types can occur in unusual histologic variants. Although NSCLCs are associated with cigarette smoke, adenocarcinomas may be found in patients who have never smoked. As a class, NSCLCs are relatively insensitive to chemotherapy and radiation therapy compared with SCLC. Patients with resectable disease may be cured by surgery or surgery followed by chemotherapy. Local control can be achieved with radiation therapy in a large number of patients with unresectable disease, but cure is seen only in a small number of patients. Patients with locally advanced unresectable disease may achieve long-term survival with radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy. Patients with advanced metastatic disease may achieve improved survival and palliation of symptoms with chemotherapy, targeted agents, and other supportive measures.

Estimated new cases and deaths from lung cancer (NSCLC and SCLC combined) in the United States in 2014:[1]

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States.[1] The 5-year relative survival rate from 1995 to 2001 for patients with lung cancer was 15.7%. The 5-year relative survival rate varies markedly depending on the stage at diagnosis, from 49% to 16% to 2% for patients with local, regional, and distant stage disease, respectively.[2]

NSCLC arises from the epithelial cells of the lung of the central bronchi to terminal alveoli. The histological type of NSCLC correlates with site of origin, reflecting the variation in respiratory tract epithelium of the bronchi to alveoli. Squamous cell carcinoma usually starts near a central bronchus. Adenocarcinoma and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma usually originate in peripheral lung tissue.

Anatomy of the respiratory system.

Smoking-related lung carcinogenesis is a multistep process. Squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma have defined premalignant precursor lesions. Before becoming invasive, lung epithelium may undergo morphological changes that include the following:

Dysplasia and carcinoma in situ are considered the principal premalignant lesions because they are more likely to progress to invasive cancer and less likely to spontaneously regress.

In addition, after resection of a lung cancer, there is a 1% to 2% risk per patient per year that a second lung cancer will occur.[3]

NSCLC is a heterogeneous aggregate of histologies. The most common histologies include the following:

Read the original post:
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment - National Cancer ...

Sickle-cell disease (SCD), also known as sickle-cell anaemia (SCA) and drepanocytosis, is a hereditary blood disorder, characterized by an abnormality in the oxygen-carrying haemoglobin molecule in red blood cells. This leads to a propensity for the cells to assume an abnormal, rigid, sickle-like shape under certain circumstances. Sickle-cell disease is associated with a number of acute and chronic health problems, such as severe infections, attacks of severe pain ("sickle-cell crisis"), and stroke, and there is an increased risk of death.

Sickle-cell disease occurs when a person inherits two abnormal copies of the haemoglobin gene, one from each parent. Several subtypes exist, depending on the exact mutation in each haemoglobin gene. A person with a single abnormal copy does not experience symptoms and is said to have sickle-cell trait. Such people are also referred to as carriers.

The complications of sickle-cell disease can be prevented to a large extent with vaccination, preventive antibiotics, blood transfusion, and the drug hydroxyurea/hydroxycarbamide. A small proportion requires a transplant of bone marrow cells.

Almost 300,000 children are born with a form of sickle-cell disease every year, mostly in sub-Saharan Africa, but also in other parts of the world such as the West Indies and in people of African origin elsewhere in the world. In 2013 it resulted in 176,000 deaths up from 113,000 deaths in 1990.[1] The condition was first described in the medical literature by the American physician James B. Herrick in 1910, and in the 1940s and 1950s contributions by Nobel prize-winner Linus Pauling made it the first disease where the exact genetic and molecular defect was elucidated.

Sickle-cell disease may lead to various acute and chronic complications, several of which have a high mortality rate.[2]

The terms "sickle-cell crisis" or "sickling crisis" may be used to describe several independent acute conditions occurring in patients with SCD. SCD results in anemia and crises that could be of many types including the vaso-occlusive crisis, aplastic crisis, sequestration crisis, haemolytic crisis, and others. Most episodes of sickle-cell crises last between five and seven days.[3] "Although infection, dehydration, and acidosis (all of which favor sickling) can act as triggers, in most instances, no predisposing cause is identified."[4]

The vaso-occlusive crisis is caused by sickle-shaped red blood cells that obstruct capillaries and restrict blood flow to an organ resulting in ischaemia, pain, necrosis, and often organ damage. The frequency, severity, and duration of these crises vary considerably. Painful crises are treated with hydration, analgesics, and blood transfusion; pain management requires opioid administration at regular intervals until the crisis has settled. For milder crises, a subgroup of patients manage on NSAIDs (such as diclofenac or naproxen). For more severe crises, most patients require inpatient management for intravenous opioids; patient-controlled analgesia devices are commonly used in this setting. Vaso-occlusive crisis involving organs such as the penis[5] or lungs are considered an emergency and treated with red-blood cell transfusions. Incentive spirometry, a technique to encourage deep breathing to minimise the development of atelectasis, is recommended.[6]

Because of its narrow vessels and function in clearing defective red blood cells, the spleen is frequently affected.[7] It is usually infarcted before the end of childhood in individuals suffering from sickle-cell anemia. This spleen damage increases the risk of infection from encapsulated organisms;[8][9] preventive antibiotics and vaccinations are recommended for those lacking proper spleen function.

Splenic sequestration crises are acute, painful enlargements of the spleen, caused by intrasplenic trapping of red cells and resulting in a precipitous fall in hemoglobin levels with the potential for hypovolemic shock. Sequestration crises are considered an emergency. If not treated, patients may die within 12 hours due to circulatory failure. Management is supportive, sometimes with blood transfusion. These crises are transient, they continue for 34 hours and may last for one day.[10]

Acute chest syndrome (ACS) is defined by at least two of the following signs or symptoms: chest pain, fever, pulmonary infiltrate or focal abnormality, respiratory symptoms, or hypoxemia.[11] It is the second-most common complication and it accounts for about 25% of deaths in patients with SCD, majority of cases present with vaso-occlusive crises then they develop ACS.[12][13] Nevertheless, about 80% of patients have vaso-occlusive crises during ACS.

More here:
Sickle-cell disease - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Description

An in-depth report on the causes, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Lung cancer - non-small cell; NSCLC

Risk:

Treatment:

Although lung cancer accounts for only 15% of all newly-diagnosed cancers in the United States, it is the leading cause of cancer death in U.S. men and women. It is more deadly than colon, breast, and prostate cancers combined. About 160,000 patients die from lung cancer each year. Death rates have been declining in men over the past decade, and they have about stabilized in women.

The lungs are two spongy organs surrounded by a thin moist membrane called the pleura. Each lung is composed of smooth, shiny lobes: the right lung has three lobes, and the left has two. About 90% of the lung is filled with air. Only 10% is solid tissue.

The major features of the lungs include the bronchi, the bronchioles, and the alveoli. The alveoli are the microscopic blood vessel-lined sacks in which oxygen and carbon dioxide gas are exchanged.

Lung cancer develops when genetic mutations (changes) occur in a normal cell within the lung. As a result, the cell becomes abnormal in shape and behavior, and reproduces endlessly. The abnormal cells form a tumor that, if not surgically removed, invades neighboring blood vessels and lymph nodes and spreads to nearby sites. Eventually, the cancer can spread (metastasize) to locations throughout the body.

The two major categories of lung cancer are small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. Most lung cancers are non-small cell cancer, the subject of this report. Less common cancers of the lung are known as carcinoids, cylindromas, and certain sarcomas (cancer in soft tissues). Some experts believe all primary lung cancers come from a single common cancerous (malignant) stem cell. As it copies itself, that stem cell can develop into any one of these cancer types in different people.

Continue reading here:
Non-small cell lung cancer | University of Maryland ...

See comment in PubMed Commons below N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 18;367(16):1487-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203517. Anasetti C, Logan BR, Lee SJ, Waller EK, Weisdorf DJ, Wingard JR, Cutler CS, Westervelt P, Woolfrey A, Couban S, Ehninger G, Johnston L, Maziarz RT, Pulsipher MA, Porter DL, Mineishi S, McCarty JM, Khan SP, Anderlini P, Bensinger WI, Leitman SF, Rowley SD, Bredeson C, Carter SL, Horowitz MM, Confer DL; Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network. Collaborators (182)

Horowitz MM, Carter SL, Confer DL, DiFronzo N, Wagner E, Merritt W, Wu R, Anasetti C, Logan BR, Lee SJ, Waller EK, Weisdorf DJ, Wingard JR, Couban S, Anderlini P, Bensinger WI, Leitman SF, Rowley SD, Carter SL, Karanes C, Horowitz MM, Confer DL, Allen C, Colby C, Gurgol C, Knust K, Foley A, King R, Mitchell P, Couban S, Pulsipher MA, Ehninger G, Johnston L, Khan SP, Maziarz RT, McCarty JM, Mineishi S, Porter DL, Bredeson C, Anasetti C, Lee S, Waller EK, Wingard JR, Cutler CS, Westervelt P, Woolfrey A, Logan BR, Carter SL, Lee SJ, Waller EK, Anasetti C, Logan BR, Lee SJ, Stadtmauer E, Wingard J, Vose J, Lazarus H, Cowan M, Wingard J, Westervelt P, Litzow M, Wu R, Geller N, Carter S, Confer D, Horowitz M, Poland N, Krance R, Carrum G, Agura E, Nademanee A, Sahdev I, Cutler C, Horwitz ME, Kurtzberg J, Waller EK, Woolfrey A, Rowley S, Brochstein J, Leber B, Wasi P, Roy J, Jansen J, Stiff PJ, Khan S, Devine S, Maziarz R, Nemecek E, Huebsch L, Couban S, McCarthy P, Johnston L, Shaughnessy P, Savoie L, Ball E, Vaughan W, Cowan M, Horn B, Wingard J, Silverman M, Abhyankar S, McGuirk J, Yanovich S, Ferrara J, Weisdorf D, Faber E Jr, Selby G, Rooms LM, Porter D, Agha M, Anderlini P, Lipton J, Pulsipher MA, Pulsipher MA, Shepherd J, Toze C, Kassim A, Frangoul H, McCarty J, Hurd D, DiPersio J, Westervelt P, Shenoy S, Agura E, Culler E, Axelrod F, Chambers L, Senaldi E, Nguyen KA, Engelman E, Hartzman R, Sutor L, Dickson L, Nademanee A, Khalife G, Lenes BA, Eames G, Sibley D, Gale P, Antin J, Ehninger G, Newberg NR, Gammon R, Montgomery M, Mair B, Rossmann S, Wada R, Waxman D, Ranlett R, Silverman M, Herzig G, Fried M, Atkinson E, Weitekamp L, Bigelow C, Miller JP, Miller JP, Miller JP, Miller JP, Miller JP, Miller JP, Miller JP, Miller JP, Miller JP, Miller JP, Miller JP, Miller JP, Miller JP, Miller JP, Miller JP, Miller JP, Price T, Young C, Hilbert R, Oh D, Cable C, Smith JW, Kalmin ND, Schultheiss K, Beck T, Lankiewicz MW, Sharp D.

Randomized trials have shown that the transplantation of filgrastim-mobilized peripheral-blood stem cells from HLA-identical siblings accelerates engraftment but increases the risks of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), as compared with the transplantation of bone marrow. Some studies have also shown that peripheral-blood stem cells are associated with a decreased rate of relapse and improved survival among recipients with high-risk leukemia.

We conducted a phase 3, multicenter, randomized trial of transplantation of peripheral-blood stem cells versus bone marrow from unrelated donors to compare 2-year survival probabilities with the use of an intention-to-treat analysis. Between March 2004 and September 2009, we enrolled 551 patients at 48 centers. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to peripheral-blood stem-cell or bone marrow transplantation, stratified according to transplantation center and disease risk. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 36 months (interquartile range, 30 to 37).

The overall survival rate at 2 years in the peripheral-blood group was 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45 to 57), as compared with 46% (95% CI, 40 to 52) in the bone marrow group (P=0.29), with an absolute difference of 5 percentage points (95% CI, -3 to 14). The overall incidence of graft failure in the peripheral-blood group was 3% (95% CI, 1 to 5), versus 9% (95% CI, 6 to 13) in the bone marrow group (P=0.002). The incidence of chronic GVHD at 2 years in the peripheral-blood group was 53% (95% CI, 45 to 61), as compared with 41% (95% CI, 34 to 48) in the bone marrow group (P=0.01). There were no significant between-group differences in the incidence of acute GVHD or relapse.

We did not detect significant survival differences between peripheral-blood stem-cell and bone marrow transplantation from unrelated donors. Exploratory analyses of secondary end points indicated that peripheral-blood stem cells may reduce the risk of graft failure, whereas bone marrow may reduce the risk of chronic GVHD. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00075816.).

Survival after Randomization in the Intention-to-Treat Analysis

The P value is from a stratified binomial comparison at the 2-year point. The P value from a stratified log-rank test was also not significant. A total of 75 patients in each group were still alive at 36 months.

N Engl J Med. 2012 October 18;367(16):10.1056/NEJMoa1203517.

Outcomes after Transplantation, According to Study Group

Continued here:
Peripheral-blood stem cells versus bone marrow from ...

ProgeniDerm Anti-Senescence Skin Stem Cell Serum encourages new epidermal cell growth while protecting and prolonging the cell life of existing skin cells. Wrinkle depth is reduced, hyperpigmentation lightened, and collagen/elastin fibers become thicker and stronger. The ratio of older skin cells to younger skin cells is reversed. Skin looks visibly younger.

Elegantly formulated with fruit-derived Malus Domestica Fruit Stem Cell Extract, ProgeniDerm protects against chromosomal damage that signals skin cells to undergo apoptosis (cell death). Often this signal is sent prematurely due to free radical damage caused by UV light, smoke, stress, etc. With protection against this damage, existing skin cells live longer and more new cells are created.

The Malus Domestica Fruit Stem Cell Extract in ProgeniDerm restores aging skin stem cells regenerative properties. In-vitro and in-vivo testing showed that this new extract:

The ultimate result: skin that regains its ability to repair itself and regenerate new skin cells within two weeks. Substantially greater numbers of new epithelial cells are formed. Enzymes are released that protect cells from damage that shorten the skin cell life cycle. The addition of chondrus crispus (red seaweed/algae extract) and palmitoyl oligopeptide in a hyaluronic acid base combine to make our ProgeniDerm Anti-Senescence Skin Stem Cell serum a powerful new tool against premature aging.

Note: Epidermal skin stem cell DNA/chromosomal protection is the newest, most exciting direction for anti-aging products currently. Cellular Skin Rx is proud to be able to provide a serum containing this cutting-edge, naturally-derived extract to our customers. Now that peptides are firmly established as helpful to the skin for relaxing, firming, and reducing inflammation, using naturally-derived fruit stem cell extracts to prevent damage at the most basic cellular level is taking skin care to a whole new realm. You will see more and more of this approach to maintaining a younger complexion moving forward -with Cellular Skin Rx proudly providing you with products that incorporate these new Active Ingredients That Work.

After applying antioxidant serum of your choice, apply twice daily including eye area.

Combining with antioxidant serums such as C+ Firming serum or CSRx Antioxidant Complex yields best results.

Two weeks to gorgeous skin routine: Each morning use CSRx Antioxidant Defense Complex then C+ Firming serum, follow with ProgeniDerm Anti-Senescence Skin Stem Cell Serum, then any wrinkle-relaxers/firming products/moisturizers/sunscreen you regularly use. Each night use Age-Limit Advanced Refinishing serum or Ultra-Gentle Enzyme Surface Peel, then apply ProgeniDerm again. In just two weeks, you will see a visible difference in your skin tone, color, and texture.

View original post here:
ProgeniDerm Anti-Senescence Skin Stem Cell Serum ...

Tobi is a six-year-old cocker spaniel whose hind legs were paralyzed after he suffered a herniated disc in his spine. Although Tobi will never fully regain the use of his legs, he has benefitted from a clinical trial involving stem cell transplantation in dogs that is currently underway at North Carolina State University.

See video presentation: Stem cell treatments for paralyzed dogs.

Dr. Natasha Olby, professor of neurology at the NC State College of Veterinary Medicine, specializes in researching treatments for long-term paralysis in dogs. According to Dr. Olby, even in the case of severe spinal cord injury all may not be lost in terms of spinal cord function there may still be salvageable, living nerves and nerve fibers, or axons, bridging the site of the injury that could still transmit signals if they had a little help.

Obviously, researchers would love to be able to replace all the lost neurons and axons and restore normal connections in a damaged spinal cord. But that sort of treatment is not yet possible. On the other hand, targeting surviving nerves and axons that are still crossing the site of the injury and restoring their conductivity is more attainable.

Often, these damaged nerves have lost the myelin sheath, fatty material that coats axons and allows them to conduct signals. Dr. Olby wants to restore the myelin sheath to these surviving axons by taking fat cells from the patient and turning them into stem cells that can be combined with nerve cells and injected into the site of the damage, regrowing the sheath. Even though she is still in the early stages of a randomized clinical trial, the results thus far are encouraging.

Dogs like Tobi will not be the only beneficiaries of Dr. Olbys research. If the therapy produces positive results in dogs, then translating the treatment to humans is a natural next step. And in humans, even very small improvements have the capacity to radically transform quality of life.

Even if this procedure produced an effect in a person as small as giving him or her partial control of one finger, that could allow the patient to use a computer, which opens up a whole new world of possibilities in terms of communication and interaction with the outside world, Dr. Olby says.

-- Tracey Peake

Dr. Olbys research is funded by the Morris Animal Foundation and is one of the clinical trials underway in the Neurology Service within the Randall B. Terry, Jr. Companion Animal Veterinary Medical Center. For more information on the clinical trial, visit the "call for patients" web page.

Posted Feb. 14, 2012

View original post here:
CVM Stem Cell Study Benefits Dogs with Spinal Cord Injuries

With Brigham and Womens Hospital and Boston Childrens Hospital, Dana-Farber has performed thousands of stem cell/bone marrow transplants for adult and pediatric patients with blood cancers and other serious illnesses.

Whats the difference between these two terms? As it turns out, the only real distinction is in the method of collecting the stem cells.

Lets start with the basics.

Stem cells are versatile cells with the ability to divide and develop into many other kinds of cells.

Hematopoietic stem cells produce red blood cells, which deliver oxygen throughout the body; white blood cells, which help ward off infections; and platelets, which allow blood to clot and wounds to heal.

While chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy are essential treatments for the majority of cancer patients, high doses can severely weakenand even wipe outhealthy stem cells. Thats where stem cell transplantation comes in.

Stem cell transplantation is a general term that describes the procedures performed by the Adult Stem Cell Transplantation Program at Dana-Farber/Brigham and Womens Cancer Center and the Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation Program at Dana-Farber/Boston Childrens Cancer and Blood Disorders Center.

Stem cells for transplant can come from bone marrow or blood.

When stem cells are collected from bone marrow and transplanted into a patient, the procedure is known as a bone marrow transplant. If the transplanted stem cells came from the bloodstream, the procedure is called a peripheral blood stem cell transplantsometimes shortened to stem cell transplant.

Whether you hear someone talking about a stem cell transplant or a bone marrow transplant, they are still referring to stem cell transplantation. The only difference is where in the body the transplanted stem cells came from. The transplants themselves are the same.

Read the original post:
Stem Cell vs. Bone Marrow Transplant: Whats the ...

Description

An in-depth report on the causes, diagnosis, and treatment of sickle cell disease.

Sickle cell anemia

What is Sickle Cell Disease?

Sickle cell disease is an inherited blood disorder in which the body produces abnormally shaped red blood cells. In sickle cell disease, the hemoglobin in red blood cells clumps together. This causes red blood cells to become stiff and C-shaped. These sickle cells block blood and oxygen flow in blood vessels. Sickle cells break down more rapidly than normal red blood cells, which results in anemia.

What Causes Sickle Cell Disease?

Sickle cell disease is a genetic disorder. People who have sickle cell disease are born with two sickle cell genes, one from each parent. If one normal hemoglobin gene and one sickle cell gene are inherited, a person will have sickle cell trait. People who have sickle cell trait do not develop sickle cell disease, but they are carriers who can pass the abnormal gene on to their children.

Complications of Sickle Cell Disease

Sickle cell disease can block the flow of blood in arteries in many parts of the body, causing many complications. The hallmark of sickle cell disease is the sickle cell crisis, which causes sudden attacks of severe pain. Acute chest syndrome, which is triggered by an infection or by blockage of blood vessels in the lungs, is another common and serious occurrence. Additional medical complications include:

New Recommended Vaccine

More:
Sickle cell disease | University of Maryland Medical Center

What is radiation therapy?

Radiation therapy uses high-energy radiation to shrink tumors and kill cancer cells (1). X-rays, gamma rays, and charged particles are types of radiation used for cancer treatment.

The radiation may be delivered by a machine outside the body (external-beam radiation therapy), or it may come from radioactive material placed in the body near cancer cells (internal radiation therapy, also called brachytherapy).

Systemic radiation therapy uses radioactive substances, such as radioactive iodine, that travel in the blood to kill cancer cells.

About half of all cancer patients receive some type of radiation therapy sometime during the course of their treatment.

How does radiation therapy kill cancer cells?

Radiation therapy kills cancer cells by damaging their DNA (the molecules inside cells that carry genetic information and pass it from one generation to the next) (1). Radiation therapy can either damage DNA directly or create charged particles (free radicals) within the cells that can in turn damage the DNA.

Cancer cells whose DNA is damaged beyond repair stop dividing or die. When the damaged cells die, they are broken down and eliminated by the bodys natural processes.

Does radiation therapy kill only cancer cells?

No, radiation therapy can also damage normal cells, leading to side effects.

Visit link:
Radiation Therapy for Cancer - National Cancer Institute

Stem Cell Clinical Research & Deployment Cardiovascular & Pulmonary Conditions

The Manhattan Regenerative Medicine Medical Group is proud to be part of the only Institutional Review Board (IRB)-based stem cell treatment network in the United States that utilizes fat-transfer surgical technology. The Manhattan Regenerative Medicine Medical Group offers IRB approved protocols and investigational use ofAdult Autologous Adipose-derived Stem Cells (ADSCs) for clinical research and deployment for numerous Cardiovascular and Pulmonary disorders, inclusive of:

Cardiovascular conditions include medical problems involving the heart and vascular system (the arterial and venous blood vessels). The most common cardiovascular condition is atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (ASCVD), which especially affects the coronary arteries and is the leading cause of heart attacks and death worldwide; and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF).

Other common cardiovascular conditions involve the cardiac muscle (CHF), cardiac valves, and heart rhythm. Many patients are typically treated with a multitude of medications; many patients require surgical interventions such as coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass, or other surgeries. Often patients, despite maximum therapy with medications and surgery, continue to suffer pain, discomfort, disability and have marked restrictions in their normal daily living activities.

The Manhattan Regenerative Medicine Medical Group is proud to be part of the only Institutional Review Board (IRB)-based stem cell treatment network in the United States that utilizes fat-transfer surgical technology. We have an array of ongoing IRB-approved protocols, andwe provide care for patients with a wide variety of disorders that may be treated with adult stem cell-based regenerative therapy.

The Manhattan Regenerative Medicine Medical Group offers IRB approved protocols and investigational use of Autologous Adult Adipose Derived Stem Cells (ADSCs) for clinical research and deployment for numerous cardiovascular conditions. These ADSCs cells are derived from fat an exceptionally abundant source of stem cells that has been removed during our mini-liposuction office procedure. The source of the regenerative stem cells actually comes from stromal vascular fraction (SVF) a protein rich segment from processed adipose tissue. SVF contains a mononuclear cell line (predominantly autologous mesenchymal stem cells), macrophage cells, endothelial cells, red blood cells, and important growth factors that facilitate the stem cell process and promote their activity. Our technology allows us to isolate high numbers of viable cells that we can deploy during the same surgical setting.

The SVF and stem cells are then deployed back into the patients body via injection or IV infusion on an outpatient basis; the total procedure takes less than two hours; and only local anesthesia is used. Not all cardiovascular problems respond to stem cell therapy, and each patient must be assessed individually to determine the potential for optimal results from this regenerative medicine process.

The Manhattan Regenerative Medicine Medical Group is committed not only to providing a high degree of quality care for our patients with cardiovascular problems but we are also highly committed to clinical stem cell research and the advancement of regenerative medicine. At the Miami Stem Cell Treatment Center we exploit anti-inflammatory, immuno-modulatory and regenerative properties of adult stem cells to mitigate cardiovascular conditions which are otherwise lethal to our bodies.

Myocardial infarction (heart attack) is responsible for significant cardiac muscle destruction and impairment due to ischemia (lack of blood flow). This can lead to further or recurrent restriction of blood flow thereby causing re-current infarct and pain on exertion (or even rest) known as chronic angina. Chronic angina causes restriction of daily activities of everyday living and is plagued with chest pain, chest pressure, and depression. This problem is caused most commonly by coronary artery disease which is very common in the United States and associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

View original post here:
Cardiovascular Stem Cell Therapy

Featured post

Stem Cell Research is an amazing field right now, and promises to be a powerful and potent tool to help us live longer and healthier lives. Just last month, for example, Stem Cell Therapy was used to restore sight in patients with severe retinal deterioration, allowing them to see clearer than they had in years, or even decades.

Now, there is another form of Stem Cell Treatment on the horizonthis one of a very different form. Stem Cells have now been used as a mechanism to deliver medical treatment designed to eliminate cancer cells, even in hard to reach places. One issue with current cancer treatments is that, treatments that are effective at treating tumors on the surface of the brain cannot be performed safely when the tumor is deeper within the brains tissues.

Stem Cells have the fantastic ability to transform into any other kind of cell within the human body, given the appropriate stimulation. As of today, most of these cells come from Embryonic Lines, but researchers are learning how to backwards engineer cells in the human body, reverting them back to their embryonic state. These cells are known as Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

How Does This Stem Cell Cancer Treatment Work?

Using genetic engineering, it is possible to create stem cells that are designed to release a chemical known as Pseudomonas Exotoxin, which has the ability to destroy certain tumor cells in the human brain.

What is Pseudomonas Exotoxin?

Pseudomonas Exotoxin is a compound that is naturally released by a form of bacteria known as Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. This chemical is toxic to brain tumor cells because it prevents polypeptides from growing longer, essentially preventing the polypeptides from growing and reproducing. When used in a specific manner, this toxin has the ability to destroy cancerous and malignant tissue without negatively impacting healthy tissue. In addition to its potential as a cancer treatment, there is also evidence that the therapy could be used for the treatment of Hepatitis B.

Excerpt from:
IPS Cell Therapy

Abstract

Myocardial infarctioninduced heart failure is a prevailing cause of death in the United States and most developed countries. The cardiac tissue has extremely limited regenerative potential, and heart transplantation for reconstituting the function of damaged heart is severely hindered mainly due to the scarcity of donor organs. To that end, stem cells with their extensive proliferative capacity and their ability to differentiate toward functional cardiomyocytes may serve as a renewable cellular source for repairing the damaged myocardium. Here, we review recent studies regarding the cardiogenic potential of adult progenitor cells and embryonic stem cells. Although large strides have been made toward the engineering of cardiac tissues using stem cells, important issues remain to be addressed to enable the translation of such technologies to the clinical setting.

Heart disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In the United States, heart failure is ranked number one as a cause of death, affecting over 5 million people and with more than 500,000 new cases diagnosed each year.1 The health care expenditures associated with heart failure were $26.7 billion in 2004 and are estimated to $33.2 billion in 2007. Although significant progress has been made in mechanical devices and pharmacological interventions, more than half of the patients with heart failure die within 5 years of initial diagnosis. Wide application of heart transplantation is severely hindered by the limited availability of donor organs. To this end, cardiac cell therapy may be an appealing alternative to current treatments for heart failure.

Recent investigations focusing on engineering cells and tissues to repair or regenerate damaged hearts in animal models and in clinical trials have yielded promising results. Considering the limited regenerative capacity of the heart muscle, renewable sources of cardiomyocytes are highly sought. Cells suitable for myocardial engineering should be nonimmunogenic, should be easy to expand to large quantities, and should differentiate into mature, fully functional cardiomyocytes capable of integrating to the host tissue. Adult progenitor cells (APCs) and embryonic stem cells (ESCs) have extensive proliferative potential and can adopt different cell fates, including that of heart cells. The recent advances in the fields of stem cell biology and heart tissue engineering have intensified efforts toward the development of regenerative cardiac therapies. In this article, we review findings pertaining to the cardiogenic potential of major APC populations and of ESCs (). We also discuss significant challenges in the way of realizing stem cellbased therapies aiming to reconstitute the normal function of heart.

Potential sources of stem/progenitor cells for cardiac repair. ESCs derived from the inner cell mass of a blastocyst can be manipulated ex vivo to differentiate toward heart cells. APCs residing in various tissues such as the BM and skeletal muscle may ...

Bone marrow (BM) is a heterogeneous tissue comprising of multiple cell types, including minute fractions of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs; 0.0010.01% of total cells2) and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs; 0.71.5cells/108 nucleated marrow cells3). The heterogeneity of BM makes challenging the identification of a subpopulation of cells capable of cardiogenesis, and studies of BM celltocardiac cell transdifferentiation should be examined through this prism.

The notion that BM-derived cells may contribute to the regeneration of the heart was first illustrated when dystrophic (mdx) female mice received BM cells from male wild-type mice.4 More than 2 months after the transplantation, tissues of the recipient mice were histologically examined for the presence of Y-chromosome+ donor cells. Besides the skeletal muscle, donor cells were identified in the cardiac region, suggesting that circulating BM cells contribute to the regeneration of cardiomyocytes.

Further supporting evidence was provided by Jackson et al.5 in studies using a side population (SP) of cells characterized by their intrinsic capacity to efflux Hoechst 33342 dye through the ATP-binding Bcrp1/ABCG2 transporter. The cells were isolated from the BM fraction of HSCs of Rosa26 mice constitutively expressing the -galactosidase reporter gene (LacZ). After SP cells were injected into mice with coronary occlusioninduced ischemia, cells coexpressing LacZ and cardiac -actinin were identified around the infarct region with a frequency of 0.02%. Endothelial engraftment was more prevalent (3.3%). The observed improvement in myocardial function may thus be attributed to the potential of BM cells to give rise to a rather endothelial progeny. This may be a parallel to cardiovascular progenitors from differentiating ESCs giving rise to cardiomyocytes, and endothelial and vascular smooth muscle lineages.6,7

Orlic et al.8 also reported the regeneration of infarcted myocardium after transplantation of lineage-negative (LIN)/C-KIT+ BM cells from transgenic mice constitutively expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP). Cells were injected in the contracting wall close to the infarct area. Nine days after transplantation, an impressive 68% of the infarct was occupied by newly formed myocardium with eGFP+ cells displaying cardiomyocyte markers such as troponin, MEF2, NKX2.5, cardiac myosin, GATA-4, and -sarcomeric actin. Similar outcomes were reported by the same group9 when mouse C-KIT+ (but not screened for LIN) BM cells were transplanted.

Although these findings led to the conclusion that BM cells can repopulate a damaged heart, work by other investigators has casted doubt on this assertion. Balsam et al.10 noted that mice with infarcts receiving BM LIN/C-KIT+, C-KIT-enriched or THY1.1low/LIN/stem cell antigen-1 (SCA-1+) cells exhibited improved ventricular function. However, donor cells expressed granulocyte but not heart cell markers 1 month after injection. In another study,11 HSCs carrying a nuclear-localized LacZ gene flanked by the cardiac -myosin heavy chain promoter were delivered into the periinfarct zone of mice 5h after coronary artery occlusion. One to 4 weeks later, LacZ+ cells were absent in heart tissue sections from 117 mice that received HSCs. Similarly, no eGFP+ cells were detected in the infarcted hearts of mice infused with BM cells constitutively expressing eGFP. Finally, Nygren et al.12 in similar transplantation experiments observed only blood cells (mainly leukocytes) originating from BM HSCs in the infarcted myocardium without evidence of transdifferentiation of donor cells to cardiomyocytes.

See more here:
Stem Cells for Heart Cell Therapies - National Center for ...

Cancer i, also known as a malignant tumor or malignant neoplasm, is a group of diseases involving abnormal cell growth with the potential to invade or spread to other parts of the body.[1][2] Not all tumors are cancerous; benign tumors do not spread to other parts of the body.[2] Possible signs and symptoms include: a new lump, abnormal bleeding, a prolonged cough, unexplained weight loss, and a change in bowel movements among others.[3] While these symptoms may indicate cancer, they may also occur due to other issues.[3] There are over 100 different known cancers that affect humans.[2]

Tobacco use is the cause of about 22% of cancer deaths.[1] Another 10% is due to obesity, a poor diet, lack of physical activity, and consumption of ethanol (alcohol).[1] Other factors include certain infections, exposure to ionizing radiation, and environmental pollutants.[4] In the developing world nearly 20% of cancers are due to infections such as hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human papillomavirus.[1] These factors act, at least partly, by changing the genes of a cell.[5] Typically many such genetic changes are required before cancer develops.[5] Approximately 510% of cancers are due to genetic defects inherited from a person's parents.[6] Cancer can be detected by certain signs and symptoms or screening tests.[1] It is then typically further investigated by medical imaging and confirmed by biopsy.[7]

Many cancers can be prevented by not smoking, maintaining a healthy weight, not drinking too much alcohol, eating plenty of vegetables, fruits and whole grains, being vaccinated against certain infectious diseases, not eating too much red meat, and avoiding too much exposure to sunlight.[8][9] Early detection through screening is useful for cervical and colorectal cancer.[10] The benefits of screening in breast cancer are controversial.[10][11] Cancer is often treated with some combination of radiation therapy, surgery, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy.[1][12] Pain and symptom management are an important part of care. Palliative care is particularly important in those with advanced disease.[1] The chance of survival depends on the type of cancer and extent of disease at the start of treatment.[5] In children under 15 at diagnosis the five year survival rate in the developed world is on average 80%.[13] For cancer in the United States the average five year survival rate is 66%.[14]

In 2012 about 14.1 million new cases of cancer occurred globally (not including skin cancer other than melanoma).[5] It caused about 8.2 million deaths or 14.6% of all human deaths.[5][15] The most common types of cancer in males are lung cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, and stomach cancer, and in females, the most common types are breast cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, and cervical cancer.[5] If skin cancer other than melanoma were included in total new cancers each year it would account for around 40% of cases.[16][17] In children, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and brain tumors are most common except in Africa where non-Hodgkin lymphoma occurs more often.[13] In 2012, about 165,000 children under 15 years of age were diagnosed with cancer. The risk of cancer increases significantly with age and many cancers occur more commonly in developed countries.[5] Rates are increasing as more people live to an old age and as lifestyle changes occur in the developing world.[18] The financial costs of cancer have been estimated at $1.16 trillion US dollars per year as of 2010.[19]

Cancers are a large family of diseases that involve abnormal cell growth with the potential to invade or spread to other parts of the body.[1][2] They form a subset of neoplasms. A neoplasm or tumor is a group of cells that have undergone unregulated growth, and will often form a mass or lump, but may be distributed diffusely.[20][21]

Six characteristics of cancer have been proposed:

The progression from normal cells to cells that can form a discernible mass to outright cancer involves multiple steps known as malignant progression.[22][23]

When cancer begins, it invariably produces no symptoms. Signs and symptoms only appear as the mass continues to grow or ulcerates. The findings that result depend on the type and location of the cancer. Few symptoms are specific, with many of them also frequently occurring in individuals who have other conditions. Cancer is the new "great imitator". Thus, it is not uncommon for people diagnosed with cancer to have been treated for other diseases, which were assumed to be causing their symptoms.[24]

Local symptoms may occur due to the mass of the tumor or its ulceration. For example, mass effects from lung cancer can cause blockage of the bronchus resulting in cough or pneumonia; esophageal cancer can cause narrowing of the esophagus, making it difficult or painful to swallow; and colorectal cancer may lead to narrowing or blockages in the bowel, resulting in changes in bowel habits. Masses in breasts or testicles may be easily felt. Ulceration can cause bleeding that, if it occurs in the lung, will lead to coughing up blood, in the bowels to anemia or rectal bleeding, in the bladder to blood in the urine, and in the uterus to vaginal bleeding. Although localized pain may occur in advanced cancer, the initial swelling is usually painless. Some cancers can cause a buildup of fluid within the chest or abdomen.[24]

General symptoms occur due to distant effects of the cancer that are not related to direct or metastatic spread. These may include: unintentional weight loss, fever, being excessively tired, and changes to the skin.[25]Hodgkin disease, leukemias, and cancers of the liver or kidney can cause a persistent fever of unknown origin.[24]

Read the rest here:
Cancer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia